Preferred Options 2025

No

Representation ID: 94456

Received: 03/03/2025

Respondent: Tiddington village residents association

Development in SG 19 would destroy the stategic gap between stratford town and tiddington village settlement which has been supported by sequential planning decisions and appeals
It would create edge of town isolated communities without appropriate infrastructure or transport links dependant upon the use of bridge foot crossing which is already over used
There will be increased risk of surface water flooding in an area already susceptible to run off flooding
There would be an unacceptable increase in traffic flow through Tiddington village.

Yes

Representation ID: 94461

Received: 03/03/2025

Respondent: Tiddington village residents association

Development at this location with appropriate provision of infrastructure would be preferable
It is of a size most likely to get the correct level of infrastructure such as schools ,health provision,shops and community facilities
This would be combined with a river crossing west of stratford to access transport links

Yes

Representation ID: 94462

Received: 03/03/2025

Respondent: Tiddington village residents association

Development at this location would be of a size likely to attract the appropriate level of infrastructure to support a new settlement and would have appropriate rail and road transport connections

No

Representation ID: 94467

Received: 03/03/2025

Respondent: Tiddington village residents association

Appropriate infrastructure for any development must be put in place before house building takes place and developers must be forced to deliver in this order as we have a long history of delayed and absent infrastructure promises in south Warwickshire .Trinity mead estate( 1 shop no schools no community facilities no health care facilities south of river)loxley road estates (no shops no transport links no community facilities)