Preferred Options 2025

Search representations

Results for Stratford upon Avon Town Centre Strategic Partnership search

New search New search

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Do you broadly support the proposals in the How to Have Your Say chapter? If you have any additional points to raise with regards to this chapter please include them here.

Representation ID: 94521

Received: 03/03/2025

Respondent: Stratford upon Avon Town Centre Strategic Partnership

Representation Summary:

Broadly yes. The partnership have answered those questions they consider relate to their purpose. Where there is no answer to a question it indicates that they neither agree or disagree with the question posed and that such questions are best tackled by individual response.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Do you broadly support the proposals in the Vision and Strategic Objectives: South Warwickshire 2050 chapter? If you have any additional points to raise with regards to this chapter please include them here.

Representation ID: 94522

Received: 03/03/2025

Respondent: Stratford upon Avon Town Centre Strategic Partnership

Representation Summary:

Yes, but given the open ended and aspirational principles it will be of limited value. It will need to be reviewed during the period of the plan

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Strategic Growth Location SG14 Question

Representation ID: 94541

Received: 03/03/2025

Respondent: Stratford upon Avon Town Centre Strategic Partnership

Representation Summary:

Please see the answer of the Town Transport Group

No

Preferred Options 2025

Strategic Growth Location SG15 Question

Representation ID: 94543

Received: 03/03/2025

Respondent: Stratford upon Avon Town Centre Strategic Partnership

Representation Summary:

While these are not considered as a new settlement, the potential agglomeration size means that they may function in a similar way. With no fast connectivity such as rail, and with buses providing the only viable public transport to Stratford-upon-Avon, the effects on traffic in the town and approaches would be untenable. TTG do not support these locations without a proper traffic assessment and planned infrastructure improvements in advance of development.

No

Preferred Options 2025

Strategic Growth Location SG16 Question

Representation ID: 94544

Received: 03/03/2025

Respondent: Stratford upon Avon Town Centre Strategic Partnership

Representation Summary:

While these are not considered as a new settlement, the potential agglomeration size means that they may function in a similar way. With no fast connectivity such as rail, and with buses providing the only viable public transport to Stratford-upon-Avon, the effects on traffic in the town and approaches would be untenable. TTG do not support these locations without a proper traffic assessment and planned infrastructure improvements in advance of development.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Strategic Growth Location SG18 Question

Representation ID: 94547

Received: 03/03/2025

Respondent: Stratford upon Avon Town Centre Strategic Partnership

Representation Summary:

However, the improvement of the rail connection to the south and Leamington spa is essential. It is valuable locally and a key
piece of infrastructure to support the economic development of the town and the sub region of South Warwickshire.

No

Preferred Options 2025

Strategic Growth Location SG19 Question

Representation ID: 94550

Received: 03/03/2025

Respondent: Stratford upon Avon Town Centre Strategic Partnership

Representation Summary:

It should be avoided unless and until the transportation infrastructure is improved particularly a western relief road.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Potential Settlement Question E1

Representation ID: 94558

Received: 03/03/2025

Respondent: Stratford upon Avon Town Centre Strategic Partnership

Representation Summary:

The site has major transport issues, and the accompanying evidence which suggests that a major transport infrastructure upgrade is not necessary due to internalisation is considered not tenable. However, this is a potentially sizeable new settlement, and as such could provide a well designed setting for homes and employment. The TTG would support this location , as it is partly developed, if a major transport upgrade is included and implemented in advance.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Potential Settlement Question F3

Representation ID: 94560

Received: 03/03/2025

Respondent: Stratford upon Avon Town Centre Strategic Partnership

Representation Summary:

This area has been assessed as four land parcels, with G1 and F3 results combined. Strategically, it offers significant but underexplored planning and transport benefits within ROA 8, including:
Major high-value employers attracting further investment.
Strong road links.
Potential for a new station, benefiting from HS2 capacity with improved travel times
An average 2-mile distance from homes, promoting active travel.
Approved planning for a 142-room hotel, expandable to 240.
Opportunity for a connectivity-focused masterplan, integrating a sustainable transport system like PRT.
This site presents a unique opportunity for an exemplar New Settlement, driven by strategic planning rather than land availability.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Potential Settlement Question G1

Representation ID: 94562

Received: 03/03/2025

Respondent: Stratford upon Avon Town Centre Strategic Partnership

Representation Summary:

This area has been assessed as four land parcels, with G1 and F3 results combined. Strategically, it offers significant but underexplored planning and transport benefits within ROA 8, including:
Major high-value employers attracting further investment.
Strong road links.
Potential for a new station, benefiting from HS2 capacity, with improved travel times
An average 2-mile distance from homes, promoting active travel.
Approved planning for a 142-room hotel, expandable to 240.
Opportunity for a connectivity-focused masterplan, integrating a sustainable transport system like PRT.
This site presents a unique opportunity for an exemplar New Settlement, driven by strategic planning rather than land availability.

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.