Preferred Options 2025

Other

Representation ID: 106879

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Bromsgrove District Council

A1 and A2 are identified in the SWLP Preferred Options as among the 'least preferred' of the potential new settlements based on the evidence base. These comments are provided given the proximity of A1, A2, and SG22 to the Bromsgrove District Council (BDC) boundary.

BDC is reviewing its Local Plan. Growth Options are not confirmed. The potential of Bromsgrove's infrastructure to accommodate Bromsgrove's growth and potential impacts from residents of A1, A2, and SG22 has not yet been established. BDC acknowledges the methodology of locating A1 and A2 close to the A435 due to proximity to strategic road and rail links. The New Settlement Background paper identifies potential settlements with good access to both the road network and the main settlements in South Warwickshire. If A1 and A2 come forward BDC would need clarification on how they would meet SWLP need given their distance from the main SWLP settlements.

BDC will work with the SWLP authorities if these proposals are advanced. Evidence would need to be provided that non-Green Belt sites are unsuitable before these sites come forward. As the evidence base identifies delivery challenges, BDC would require clarification on infrastructure delivery to ensure no adverse impacts on Bromsgrove District should they come forward without full infrastructure in place due to development phasing.

Other

Representation ID: 106880

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Bromsgrove District Council

A1 and A2 are identified in the SWLP Preferred Options as among the 'least preferred' of the potential new settlements based on the evidence base. These comments are provided given the proximity of A1, A2, and SG22 to the Bromsgrove District Council (BDC) boundary.

BDC is reviewing its Local Plan. Growth Options are not confirmed. The potential of Bromsgrove's infrastructure to accommodate Bromsgrove's growth and potential impacts from residents of A1, A2, and SG22 has not yet been established. BDC acknowledges the methodology of locating A1 and A2 close to the A435 due to proximity to strategic road and rail links. The New Settlement Background paper identifies potential settlements with good access to both the road network and the main settlements in South Warwickshire. If A1 and A2 come forward BDC would need clarification on how they would meet SWLP need given their distance from the main SWLP settlements.

BDC will work with the SWLP authorities if these proposals are advanced. Evidence would need to be provided that non-Green Belt sites are unsuitable before these sites come forward. As the evidence base identifies delivery challenges, BDC would require clarification on infrastructure delivery to ensure no adverse impacts on Bromsgrove District should they come forward without full infrastructure in place due to development phasing.

Other

Representation ID: 106881

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Bromsgrove District Council

A1 and A2 are identified in the SWLP Preferred Options as among the 'least preferred' of the potential new settlements based on the evidence base. These comments are provided given the proximity of A1, A2, and SG22 to the Bromsgrove District Council (BDC) boundary.

BDC is reviewing its Local Plan. Growth Options are not confirmed. The potential of Bromsgrove's infrastructure to accommodate Bromsgrove's growth and potential impacts from residents of A1, A2, and SG22 has not yet been established. BDC acknowledges the methodology of locating A1 and A2 close to the A435 due to proximity to strategic road and rail links. The New Settlement Background paper identifies potential settlements with good access to both the road network and the main settlements in South Warwickshire. If A1 and A2 come forward BDC would need clarification on how they would meet SWLP need given their distance from the main SWLP settlements.

BDC will work with the SWLP authorities if these proposals are advanced. Evidence would need to be provided that non-Green Belt sites are unsuitable before these sites come forward. As the evidence base identifies delivery challenges, BDC would require clarification on infrastructure delivery to ensure no adverse impacts on Bromsgrove District should they come forward without full infrastructure in place due to development phasing.