Preferred Options 2025
Search representations
Results for Cotswold District Council search
New searchYes
Preferred Options 2025
Do you broadly support the proposals in the Introduction? If you have any additional points to raise with regards to this chapter please include them here.
Representation ID: 96475
Received: 05/03/2025
Respondent: Cotswold District Council
No comments on the introduction
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction 6- Safeguarding land for transport proposals?
Representation ID: 98701
Received: 06/03/2025
Respondent: Cotswold District Council
The Council generally supports this proposal. Continued cooperation on transport matters will be essential, given the proposed amount of growth close to Cotswold District and emerging development proposals inside Cotswold District. The Council is aware of potential highway capacity issues on the B4632, which spans between Cotswold and Stratford-on-Avon Districts, and the Council requests that particular consideration is given to this issue. The Council also supports the proposals that promote the reinstatement of the Honeybourne to Stratford railway line.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction-11- Meeting the Accommodation Needs of Gypsies, Travellers, Travelling Showpeople and Boat Dwellers?
Representation ID: 98706
Received: 06/03/2025
Respondent: Cotswold District Council
Cotswold District Council is happy to continue to work with Warwick and Stratford-on-Avon District Councils on cross-boundary duty to cooperate issues such as this. No cross-boundary issues have been identified to date.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction-34-Vale of Evesham Control Zone?
Representation ID: 98708
Received: 06/03/2025
Respondent: Cotswold District Council
Cotswold District Council is now also retaining this policy in its Local Plan until an alternative approach is agreed.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy-E- Protecting Large Scale Existing Renewable Energy Infrastructure?
Representation ID: 98919
Received: 06/03/2025
Respondent: Cotswold District Council
Support
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction-25- Strategic Design Principles?
Representation ID: 98931
Received: 06/03/2025
Respondent: Cotswold District Council
Reference could be made to early community engagement in the design process.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction-29-Pollution?
Representation ID: 98945
Received: 06/03/2025
Respondent: Cotswold District Council
Support
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction-36 - Protection of Sites, Habitats and Species?
Representation ID: 98956
Received: 06/03/2025
Respondent: Cotswold District Council
support
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction-37- Local Nature Recovery Strategy?
Representation ID: 98963
Received: 06/03/2025
Respondent: Cotswold District Council
Support
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction-38 - Biodiversity Net Gain?
Representation ID: 98969
Received: 06/03/2025
Respondent: Cotswold District Council
Support
