Preferred Options 2025
Search representations
Results for Residents Concerned for Kenilworth South search
New searchNo
Preferred Options 2025
Strategic Growth Location SG04 Question
Representation ID: 100586
Received: 07/03/2025
Respondent: Residents Concerned for Kenilworth South
No physical existing boundary for redesignation of greenbelt and prevent coalescence with Leek Wotton/Beausale. Green belt land should be protected. No exceptional circumstances.
Negative impact on Arden Special Landscape Area with historical significance of Kenilworth’s castle “Olde Parke”. Important views and openness across to Kenilworth castle. Loss of walking paths for residents and community groups.
Loss of productive farmland. SG04 provides 2nd lowest housing capacity yield of all spatial growth areas.
Local amenities at capacity and overstretched.
Road infrastructure around Rouncil Lane unsuitable for influx of vehicles, creating dangerous bottlenecks and undermining safety of National Cycle Route 52.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Strategic Growth Location SG08 Question
Representation ID: 100587
Received: 07/03/2025
Respondent: Residents Concerned for Kenilworth South
Support housing development on non-green belt land.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Strategic Growth Location SG09 Question
Representation ID: 100588
Received: 07/03/2025
Respondent: Residents Concerned for Kenilworth South
Support housing development on non-green belt land.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Strategic Growth Location SG09 Question
Representation ID: 100589
Received: 07/03/2025
Respondent: Residents Concerned for Kenilworth South
Support housing development on non-green belt land.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Strategic Growth Location SG10 Question
Representation ID: 100590
Received: 07/03/2025
Respondent: Residents Concerned for Kenilworth South
Support housing development on non-green belt land.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Strategic Growth Location SG11 Question
Representation ID: 100591
Received: 07/03/2025
Respondent: Residents Concerned for Kenilworth South
Support housing development on non-green belt land.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Strategic Growth Location SG12 Question
Representation ID: 100592
Received: 07/03/2025
Respondent: Residents Concerned for Kenilworth South
Support housing development on non-green belt land.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Strategic Growth Location SG13 Question
Representation ID: 100594
Received: 07/03/2025
Respondent: Residents Concerned for Kenilworth South
Support housing development on non-green belt land.
This site provides the spatial capacity to develop new amenities to support the increased housing which is more sustainable.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Strategic Growth Location SG15 Question
Representation ID: 100595
Received: 07/03/2025
Respondent: Residents Concerned for Kenilworth South
Support housing development on non-green belt land.
As the second largest spacial growth area this provides the space to include local amenities alongside housing which is more sustainable.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Strategic Growth Location SG17 Question
Representation ID: 100596
Received: 07/03/2025
Respondent: Residents Concerned for Kenilworth South
Support housing development on non-green belt land.