Preferred Options 2025
Search representations
Results for Propernomics Ltd search
New searchOther
Preferred Options 2025
Do you broadly support the proposals in the Vision and Strategic Objectives: South Warwickshire 2050 chapter? If you have any additional points to raise with regards to this chapter please include them here.
Representation ID: 101124
Received: 07/03/2025
Respondent: Propernomics Ltd
The achievement of the vision and strategic objectives relies on the actual delivery of development. Small sites, including "reserve sites" in Local Service Villages, have the advantage of being capable of delivery in the shorter term than major sites and infrastructure projects. Hence a variety of sites should be developed in tandem if the Local Plan's objectives are to be achieved.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Do you have any comments on a specific site proposal or the HELAA results?
Representation ID: 101965
Received: 07/03/2025
Respondent: Propernomics Ltd
HELAA site ref. 203 - "Land adjacent Sports and Social Club, Byfield Road, Priors Marston" is exceptionally well located in terms of accessibility to facilities for "open space, leisure, recreation, wellbeing" and "places to meet". Furthermore, the proposed development could facilitate better access to the Sports and Social Club for members of the wider community as a consequence of development. This should be reflected in a more favourable score for the site compared to others.
Other
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction 3- Small Scale Development, Settlement Boundaries and Infill Development?
Representation ID: 102516
Received: 07/03/2025
Respondent: Propernomics Ltd
Justification also includes para 74 of the NPPF which says that neighbourhood planning groups should also give particular consideration to the opportunities for allocating small and medium-sized sites.
Other
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction-25- Strategic Design Principles?
Representation ID: 102924
Received: 07/03/2025
Respondent: Propernomics Ltd
The policy notes that it is beneficial if people's day to day needs can be met within walking distance. However, there will be many desirable developments that cannot operate as "20-minute neighbourhoods" due to their size, context or other external factors. The policy should be clear that it is referring to new settlements (insert "new") rather than smaller sites or plots.
No
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction-31- Sustainable Transport Accessibility?
Representation ID: 103090
Received: 07/03/2025
Respondent: Propernomics Ltd
The policy should reflect the fact that rural communities will continue to depend upon private transport. Many desirable developments, especially small, non-strategic sites and plots will not be able to subsidise public transport or provide infrastructure to the extent envisaged by the draft policy. Hence the reference to "all" new developments and proposals should be modified so as not to discriminate against small sites and rural locations.
