Preferred Options 2025
Search representations
Results for Baddesley Clinton Parish Council search
New searchNo
Preferred Options 2025
Potential Settlement Question C1
Representation ID: 96145
Received: 04/03/2025
Respondent: Baddesley Clinton Parish Council
I believe this site is wholly inappropriate being entirely within Green Belt and served poorly by infrastructure in terms of bus routes, train transport etc The Road network in this area is unsuitable for a large development with many roads in or around the area are too narrow to have centre lane markings. There is inadequate school, medical or shopping facilities without commuting. There would also be substantial detrimental effects upon wildlife habitats.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction 3- Small Scale Development, Settlement Boundaries and Infill Development?
Representation ID: 96148
Received: 04/03/2025
Respondent: Baddesley Clinton Parish Council
Limited infill for specific needs of the community is preferable to large scale developments in Green Belt areas.
No
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction 4- Accommodating Growth Needs Arising from Outside South Warwickshire?
Representation ID: 96154
Received: 04/03/2025
Respondent: Baddesley Clinton Parish Council
Any large scale developments, or even moderate scale developments for the benefit of those living outside Warwickshire would result in significant increase in commuting which from an environmental standpoint is unacceptable.
