Preferred Options 2025

No

Representation ID: 95196

Received: 04/03/2025

Respondent: Stratford upon Avon District Council

Not a suitable strategic growth location because: It does not meet Strategic Objective 1 – “Providing sustainable levels of growth in the area” It does not meet Strategic Objective 3 – “Providing infrastructure in the right place at the right time” It does not meet Strategic Objective 6 “Reducing and managing risk of flooding from all sources” Shipston does not meet Spatial Growth Strategy objectives...“Urban land available… rail stations and bus stops with good travel times to major towns… Enterprise hubs… places where people can earn and spend money, including town centres, employment sites, and neighbouring major settlements.”

Yes

Representation ID: 95763

Received: 04/03/2025

Respondent: Stratford upon Avon District Council

Broadly I support the Strategic Objectives

No

Representation ID: 95773

Received: 04/03/2025

Respondent: Stratford upon Avon District Council

SG11 South East Of Whitnash Group
I do not agree with this cluster being included in the plan as set out.
Whilst broadly supporting the strategic objectives, this parcel of land is an elongated ribbon of differing character between its western and southern eastern ends, crossing District boundaries. It scores badly at 63.38 and has flooding and landscape issues that make unusable for development consideration at the south eastern portion close to the hamlet of Chesterton.

No

Representation ID: 95782

Received: 04/03/2025

Respondent: Stratford upon Avon District Council

Whilst broadly supporting the strategic objectives, I do not agree with this cluster being included in the plan as set out.

No

Representation ID: 95793

Received: 04/03/2025

Respondent: Stratford upon Avon District Council

I do not agree with this cluster being included in the plan. The sites within the cluster perform very badly on the objective scoring system and should be eliminated. In detail, the reasons are primarily that it is not in conformance with Strategic Objectives of the SWLP.

No

Representation ID: 95798

Received: 04/03/2025

Respondent: Stratford upon Avon District Council

I do not agree with this cluster being included in the plan. The sites within the cluster perform very badly on the objective scoring system and should be eliminated. In detail, the reasons are primarily that it is not in conformance with Strategic Objectives of the SWLP, with which I broadly agree.

No

Representation ID: 95807

Received: 04/03/2025

Respondent: Stratford upon Avon District Council

I do not agree with this site being included in the plan. My reasons are primarily that it is not in conformance with Strategic Objectives of the SWLP, with which I broadly agree.

No

Representation ID: 95825

Received: 04/03/2025

Respondent: Stratford upon Avon District Council

I do not agree with this site being included in the plan. My reasons are primarily that it is not in conformance with Strategic Objectives of the SWLP, with which I broadly agree.

No

Representation ID: 95828

Received: 04/03/2025

Respondent: Stratford upon Avon District Council

I do not agree with this site being included in the plan. My reasons are primarily that it is not in conformance with Strategic Objectives of the SWLP, with which I broadly agree.

No

Representation ID: 95836

Received: 04/03/2025

Respondent: Stratford upon Avon District Council

I do not agree with this site being included in the plan. My reasons are primarily that it is not in conformance with Strategic Objectives of the SWLP, with which I broadly agree.