Other

Representation ID: 90628

Received: 24/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Ken Simons

Limited development that does not impinge on the landscape character and meets local needs

Yes

Representation ID: 90644

Received: 24/02/2025

Respondent: Ms Alice Smith

This site is the perfect site for inclusion in the SWLP preferred options given the existing road infrastructure and proximity to nearby towns.

Yes

Representation ID: 90709

Received: 24/02/2025

Respondent: Averil Stewart

keep new development closure to road infrastructure opportunites like motorways is far more sensible

No

Representation ID: 90839

Received: 24/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Shannon Moore

Current assessment is ‘less suitable’. I agree. The local infrastructure is not coping with the current level of housing and the rural nature of this village would be further eroded. Transport links are poor. Local services are overstretched.

Other

Representation ID: 91057

Received: 25/02/2025

Respondent: Julian Brown

Part Development but A2 more suitable for housing and business given its location to good infrastructure.

No

Representation ID: 91125

Received: 25/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs liz jackson

within greebelt

Yes

Representation ID: 91315

Received: 25/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Katl Grant

Already large housing development in progress within very close proximity. All local amenities over stressed. Local road already running at high capacity at rush hour, as a rat run for traffic into Solihull.

No

Representation ID: 91370

Received: 26/02/2025

Respondent: Miss Agata Nowak

too many houses

No

Representation ID: 91444

Received: 26/02/2025

Respondent: Ms Lucia Restall Orr

The proposal will impact the following Local Wildlife Sites: River Alne LWS, Round Wood and Long Wood LWS, Grove Wood PLWS and Grotton Hill Wood LWS

Yes

Representation ID: 91961

Received: 27/02/2025

Respondent: Mr James OShea

This is a location that is in close proximity to good highways infrastructure and employment centres.

No

Representation ID: 92074

Received: 27/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Robin Broughton

Beautiful green belt and village community would be destroyed

Yes

Representation ID: 92140

Received: 27/02/2025

Respondent: Dr Deanna Fernie

This option would have direct access to major roads (A435 and M42) as well as train at Danzey and Redditch, and is within close commuting distance to Birmingham and Redditch making it sustainable both from infrastructure and economic perspectives. The Green Belt here does not protect a historic landmark in the way it does at B1 or BW.

No

Representation ID: 92170

Received: 27/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Richard Saunders

This will cause even more traffic congestion! Plus, the lack of Schools, Doctors, Hospitals (including Warwick). Means a strain on the area! Stratford has had its total capacity for new builds!

No

Representation ID: 92204

Received: 27/02/2025

Respondent: Miss Sara Burney

Tanworth in Arden is a tiny village, and to propose to build on huge swathes of land surrounding it is ridiculous. What roads will these houses be using? Medical centres? Hospitals? The facilities in South Warwickshire aren't good for a start, with demand already outstripping capacity. With an aging population, this is a recipe for disaster. Our infrastructure simply isn't sufficient to deal with the movement of so many new households. The only reliable thing about the trainline is the certainty of delays and cancellations. You'll do nothing but cause more traffic on already overcrowded roads.

No

Representation ID: 92208

Received: 27/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Laura Gibb

Tanworth has no local facilities. It is surrounded by farmland and small country lanes. Large farm vehicles regularly use the roads and the lanes are really only wide enough for single traffic. The mobile phone networks are patchy and not all current properties are on mains sewerage. It is impossible to see how this area could sustain an entire new development. The River Alne regularly floods. There is a lack of easily accessible local amenities.

Yes

Representation ID: 92328

Received: 28/02/2025

Respondent: Harbury Parish Council

This is close to major motorways and has a nearby train station for commuters to B'ham.

Yes

Representation ID: 92394

Received: 28/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Luke Marsden

Is around an existing town there is good infrastructure already in place. Does not effect the characteristics of the town

Yes

Representation ID: 92927

Received: 01/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Ed Molloy

Punching a hole in the green belt for a new development is preferable to towns and villages sprawling into each other.

Yes

Representation ID: 92985

Received: 01/03/2025

Respondent: Mr oliver spicer

Creating new settlement here near and adjacent Birmingham would be the best use of the land, links to motorway and train or public transport. New infrastructure would be required for the development and it should be installed front end before any housing is sold.

No

Representation ID: 93431

Received: 02/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Teresa Hayes

Greenbelt land.

No

Representation ID: 93491

Received: 02/03/2025

Respondent: Jocelyn Le Page

Green belt should be preserved

No

Representation ID: 93493

Received: 02/03/2025

Respondent: Jocelyn Le Page

Greenbelt so should not be developed

No

Representation ID: 93517

Received: 02/03/2025

Respondent: Bernard Davis

This area is far to small to form the basis of a self-contained sustainable location. It is in the green belt with no "exceptional circumstances"

No

Representation ID: 93715

Received: 02/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Christopher Bennett

This site includes significant areas of woodland and green belt and housing development here would significantly degrade these. I don't see any advantage in terms of infrastructure other than the railway station at Danzey. The area feels unspoilt, with pristine countryside with only very small settlements. This should not be lost.

No

Representation ID: 94227

Received: 03/03/2025

Respondent: Ms Jan Shaylor

As your comment says it is less suitable and it is green belt land that should not be encroached

No

Representation ID: 94318

Received: 03/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Felicity Marsden

Tanworth in Arden is beautiful small village and must be kept that way. The greenbelt around our village is of rolling hills and completely part of historic value to the Parish, with absolutely vital farms as well, which must be kept. Totally unsuitable for a new settlement.

Other

Representation ID: 94764

Received: 03/03/2025

Respondent: Kineton Parish Council

We have insufficient knowledge of the location from which to make an informed comment

No

Representation ID: 95048

Received: 03/03/2025

Respondent: Ms Freya Schmidt-Hansen

It will impact the surrounding area and the current residents negatively

No

Representation ID: 95093

Received: 03/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Rob Way

The proposed development is unsuitable due to its sensitive, undulating landscape within the Green Belt, and would significantly impact Warwickshire's preserved countryside. The existing infrastructure is inadequate, with Danzey Station offering limited train service and frequent flooding issues. The area lacks necessary utilities, making development financially prohibitive. The site is rated 11th out of 12 in the 2024 Sustainability Appraisal by Lepus. Preserving historical and ecological significance, the focus should be on strategic growth within existing settlements, particularly those with better rail and other infrastructure, minimizing environmental impact.

Yes

Representation ID: 95142

Received: 03/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Tom Matthews

This site is an excellent choice, due to close link to Birmigham and the great motorway , rail and air links.