Yes

Representation ID: 86199

Received: 15/01/2025

Respondent: Professor Paul Bywaters

.

Other

Representation ID: 86215

Received: 15/01/2025

Respondent: Mrs Linda Dane

I would support some development on land identified in the Neighbourhood Plan, but the map shows a very large area most of which is unsuitable and such a large increase in the village is not acceptable. The map is truly alarming to look at. A detailed plan of the area is needed.

Other

Representation ID: 86268

Received: 18/01/2025

Respondent: Ms Ruth Buckley

Not an area where we have adequate knowledge to comment.

Yes

Representation ID: 86497

Received: 27/01/2025

Respondent: Mrs C Dempster

spread out the development

No

Representation ID: 86533

Received: 27/01/2025

Respondent: Keith James

This area floods each year, I have added myself to the environment agency flood line alert service. The frequency of the warnings is increasing year on year. In the last 5 months I have had 17 warnings. It would be a complete disaster to build houses over this land and i believe it would significantly make worse the flooding in Wellesbourne and downstream Walton and Stratford upon Avon.

Other

Representation ID: 86562

Received: 28/01/2025

Respondent: Mr Peter Bridgewater

If any development is needed, it should be North of Wellesbourne, towards the already more densely developed areas. However, Wellesbourne needs more facilities if it is to accommodate more development and not just be a dormitory town for commuters to drive north to work and shopping.

Yes

Representation ID: 86728

Received: 29/01/2025

Respondent: Miss Claire Whitehouse

Good location using Wellesbourne airfield rather than new greenbelt land.

Other

Representation ID: 86738

Received: 29/01/2025

Respondent: Mrs Linda Dane

I only agree with those areas identified in the Neighbourhood Plan being included. Most of the rest of the area is unsuitable due to flood risk and poor access

Yes

Representation ID: 87038

Received: 03/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Judith Corless

Small housing growth is possible as the school at present is full.

No

Representation ID: 87154

Received: 05/02/2025

Respondent: Suzanna Wood

I object to this area being used for growth for the following reasons:
Flood risk (to new and exisiting properties)
Too much more housing in this area will fundamentally change the character of Wellesbourne
Pressure on local services, espcially dentist and both primary and secondary schools in the area
The University of Warwick has submitted planning application for the Stratford Innovation campus in this area. This campus would be totally subsumed by further development in the area. The farm land surrounding the campus is also essential for the research work going on at the campus.
Traffic levels on A429

No

Representation ID: 87179

Received: 05/02/2025

Respondent: Ms Lesley Adams

This is prime agricultural land which should not be lost to building development. We need to preserve some agricultural land to grow the crops for now and future generations. It is also beautiful green belt countryside with a rich variety of plant and animal species.

No

Representation ID: 87197

Received: 06/02/2025

Respondent: Mr R M Boorman

This is prime agricultural land which should not be lost to building development. We need to preserve some agricultural land to grow the crops for now and future generations. It is also beautiful green belt countryside with a rich variety of plant and animal species.

No

Representation ID: 87306

Received: 08/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Anthony Baxter

Some of this land provides runoff during wet weather for the brook that runs to the north of wellesbourne. Further development including non porous surfaces will increase flooding frequency and severity. Significant development of this area will also exacerbate traffic issues along the A429, especially during weekends where the market is on. Additionally the plans for quarry near barford will also cause traffic issues. This scale of development requires off highway public transport to support sustainable travel e.g. train or light rail connections to nearby towns and dedicated cycle ways.

Yes

Representation ID: 87349

Received: 08/02/2025

Respondent: Cllr Andrew Day

None

No

Representation ID: 87480

Received: 09/02/2025

Respondent: John Murphy

Development around Wellesbourne, up to the University campus - or NVRS as it was previously known - may be acceptable, or even essential but the sprawl and drift must stop there - BEFORE it eventually joins up with Leamington and subsumes all the rural settings in between. The amount of land being taken suggests that there is little notice of the NPPF direction to be economic with land-take...

No

Representation ID: 87530

Received: 09/02/2025

Respondent: Michaelina Jakala

I do not support - too much development with too little infrastructure. This is a rural area and this will also disturb the natural habitat and green areas.

No

Representation ID: 87531

Received: 09/02/2025

Respondent: Michaelina Jakala

I do not support - too much development with too little infrastructure. This is a rural area and this will also disturb the natural habitat and green areas.

No

Representation ID: 87724

Received: 10/02/2025

Respondent: Graham Moss

Increased flood risk of the brook running along the northern edge of Wellesbourne..
B4087 unsuitable for extra traffic, including the village school traffic & T-junction.
Northern end of B4087 is at an accident black spot with the motorway junction (J14)
A429 traffic levels at a critical level - any disturbance (road works, or busy market traffic) causes major congestion

No

Representation ID: 87801

Received: 11/02/2025

Respondent: Mr David Rose

This is an area of countryside enjoyed by residents. This would significantly harm the character of the landscape. There is insufficient educational and health facilities within the village to accommodate a large increase in housing around Wellesbourne which has seen significant house building for some time now.

No

Representation ID: 87910

Received: 12/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Adam Ellerington

There is insufficient infrastructure for further development. Any increased development will compromise the village character and will increase traffic on the A429 and local roads. The area is prone to flooding.

No

Representation ID: 88099

Received: 13/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Gary Davies

Very poor and ill thought out proposals (SG15&16). Largely built on flood plains and again, removing all current green space and public rights of way. Infrastructure cannot cope. University of Warwick Campus expansion also affects these areas (SG15).

Wellesbourne has also had a significant development in recent years; which has already stressed services.

We also risk losing village identity when the plans join Wellesbourne with Charlecote, Loxley and Newbold Pacey.

SG16 would also remove one of the only GA airfields in the Midlands.

No

Representation ID: 88102

Received: 13/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Gary Davies

Very poor and ill thought out proposals (SG15&16).

Largely built on flood plains and again, removing all current green space and public rights of way.

Infrastructure is already struggling to cope.

In addition University of Warwick Campus expansion also affects these areas (SG15). There is also risk of the minerals quarry further removing any green space.

Wellesbourne has had significant development in recent years; which has already stressed services.

We risk losing village identity when the plans join Wellesbourne with Charlecote, Loxley and Newbold Pacey.

No

Representation ID: 88112

Received: 13/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Andy Woods

Wellesbourne and Charlecote are villages that are proud of their separate identities which have been maintained since before the time of the Domesday Book. Currently, an acceptable green buffer exists between the two settlements comprising well-managed high-quality agricultural farmland and hedgerows.Local facilities and infrastructure can not support further expansion, school, doctors surgery and dentists at capacity,

No

Representation ID: 88121

Received: 13/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Emma

Significant harm to the character of the landscape lack of rail connectivity and schools , depletion of farm land. Building on a flood plane , infrastructure insufficient as Wellesbourne is presently so will be woefully inadequate with further development. Possible sites of historic interest

No

Representation ID: 88140

Received: 13/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Anne Parry

Significant harm to the character of the landscape, lack of rail connectivity, educational, medical/health facilities, depletion of best and most versatile land, resulting in crease to flooding risk. Significant increase in traffic movements, impacting local roads around Charlecote and Hampton Lucy as well as Wellesbourne and A429.

No

Representation ID: 88175

Received: 14/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Rozanne Harris

It would be an absolute disgrace if this area was turned over for housing. Its green belt land, surrounding Charlecote. I think its disgusting it's even been put forward as a potential site.

No

Representation ID: 88191

Received: 14/02/2025

Respondent: Dr Matthew Kidd

I strongly oppose the proposed Strategic Growth Location. Wellesbourne has already seen significant development in recent years, placing considerable pressure on local infrastructure, including roads, healthcare, and schools. Further large-scale development in and around the village would irreversibly alter its character, erode green space, and exacerbate congestion and strain on services.

Additionally, SG15 encroaches upon areas of ecological importance, contradicting the principles of sustainable development. The loss of greenfield sites to development would undermine local biodiversity and diminish the village’s distinct rural identity. Rather than expanding Wellesbourne further, development should be directed towards existing urban centres with better infrastructure capacity.

No

Representation ID: 88193

Received: 14/02/2025

Respondent: Dr Matthew Kidd

I strongly oppose the proposed Strategic Growth Location. Wellesbourne has already seen significant development in recent years, placing considerable pressure on local infrastructure, including roads, healthcare, and schools. Further large-scale development in and around the village would irreversibly alter its character, erode green space, and exacerbate congestion and strain on services.

Additionally, SG15 encroaches upon areas of ecological importance, contradicting the principles of sustainable development. The loss of greenfield sites to development would undermine local biodiversity and diminish the village’s distinct rural identity. Rather than expanding Wellesbourne further, development should be directed towards existing urban centres with better infrastructure capacity.

Other

Representation ID: 88250

Received: 14/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Ida Marjorie Brown

My question is - I drive through Wellesbourne and it has grown immensely with housing over the past decade.. My concern, as with many sites in rural locations, is whether it will just be for housing as i question what type of employment / business services would be located here - small enterprises and maybe some medium but beyond that I do not see a growth plan in the UK how we intended to grow as a country and the type of jobs available. As with all these sites more explanation as to what is earmarked for them.

No

Representation ID: 88350

Received: 15/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Barrie Hayles

The green space between Leamington, Warwick, Whitnash, Bishop's Tachbrook and Wellesbourne is further threatened by this proposal. It is vital that this whole area does not become one urban sprawl, ruining for ever the character and history of so many of Warwickshire's towns and villages. The pressure on the Warwick - Banbury Road is immense already due to the M40 junctions, JLR at Gaydon and vast housing developments still taking place at Warwick, Lighthorne and beyond. Junctions at Bishop's Tachbrook with this road are highly dangerous and would be made even worse.