Yes

Representation ID: 91013

Received: 25/02/2025

Respondent: Julian Brown

Agree. Good to expand Southam and provide employment opportunities as well as housing. My only reservation is what type of businesses and employment can be attracted to these sites given the distance to good infrastructure.

Yes

Representation ID: 91031

Received: 25/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Rodney Hicken

Well connected current growth area

Yes

Representation ID: 91119

Received: 25/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs liz jackson

outside greenbelt

No

Representation ID: 91421

Received: 26/02/2025

Respondent: Ms Lucia Restall Orr

The proposal will impact the following Local Wildlife Sites: Long Itchington Quarry LWS and River Itchen PLWS

Yes

Representation ID: 91934

Received: 27/02/2025

Respondent: Mr James OShea

This is a suitable and sustainable location which has the relevant infrastructure to work with

Yes

Representation ID: 92071

Received: 27/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Robin Broughton

Makes sense
Local amenities and roads can cope

No

Representation ID: 92176

Received: 27/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Edward Wilson

The infrastructure will not match the schooling, medical, transport,etc needs which are already under immense pressure.

No

Representation ID: 92302

Received: 28/02/2025

Respondent: Mr James Wilkinson

Inappropriate as lock of facilities and loss of countryside

No

Representation ID: 92307

Received: 28/02/2025

Respondent: Harbury Parish Council

Southam has already taken substantial development and lacks a rail station therefore all of SG12 would be overdevelopment and put excessive pressure on local services.

Yes

Representation ID: 92904

Received: 01/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Ed Molloy

Not Green Belt. Better for sustainability than other sites, close to Southam centre

Yes

Representation ID: 92957

Received: 01/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Dominic Momcilovic

This development would meet existing infrastructure and least impact on the environment

Yes

Representation ID: 93103

Received: 01/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Andrew Waters

Some limited growth could take place especially as HS2 construction has caused some physical growth already and there may be opportunities to utilise space "left over" when HS2 works are complete

Yes

Representation ID: 93109

Received: 01/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Naomi McAinsh

The warwickshire plan for housing can be done by not using greenbelt and this has to be the chosen option -otherwise the repercussions to biodiversity will be devastating

Yes

Representation ID: 93434

Received: 02/03/2025

Respondent: Bernard Davis

Southam is a largely self-contained small town and, as such, can accomode reasonable expansion, provided local amenities are expanded to provide for more people.

Yes

Representation ID: 93627

Received: 02/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Christopher Bennett

These sites are very logical and to my mind appropriately manageable additional housing for the town of Southam, well supported by the existing transport infrastructure and community services there.

Yes

Representation ID: 93945

Received: 02/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Beverley Comley

Looks fairly well balanced expansion

Yes

Representation ID: 94326

Received: 03/03/2025

Respondent: mr william tansey

Further infrastructure and facilities development will also required (cycle routes, schools, shops, medical centres and recreational facilities) which will further boost the economy in an area with significant and existing close links to major transport infrastructure and help improve the ideology of 20 minute communities. There is an opportunity to improve green credentials and sustainable transport in this area by preventing unnecessary journeys to other larger developed areas such as leamington and warwick.

Yes

Representation ID: 94433

Received: 03/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Belinda Brown

This is non-green belt land and therefore a much more appropriate potential development site. No homes should be being built on green belt land as a part of this SWLP, when there are other sites, including this one, available!

Yes

Representation ID: 94540

Received: 03/03/2025

Respondent: Mr John Steen

Not Green Belt land

Other

Representation ID: 94726

Received: 03/03/2025

Respondent: Kineton Parish Council

we have insufficient knowledge of this location from which to make an informed comment

No

Representation ID: 95163

Received: 04/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Alexander Steel

Southam doesn't need developing any more. Many people have brought here for the quiet location with less people around. If more houses are built please take into account Southam high street is not ready for this. The high street needs a butchers, bakery, decent café with fresh bakes. The leisure centre in Southam is tiny now let alone adding more people into the area.
Flying Fields site = disabled / blind / pushchair users currently can't safely access Southam town due to no wide safe paths and no zebra crossing on Ring road near Daventry Road. Also no tactile pavement.

Yes

Representation ID: 95176

Received: 04/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Edward Wilson

Seems to be the right level of development for the infrastructure.

Yes

Representation ID: 95425

Received: 04/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Hannah Molloy

Good for sustainability as near to town centre of Southam minimising car use. Not Green Belt

Other

Representation ID: 95550

Received: 04/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Patricia Holliday

I think some of the smaller areas within the town limits would be ideal, but the larger areas on the perimeter are valuable Green Belt which should be maintained for future generations to enjoy.

Yes

Representation ID: 95556

Received: 04/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Ian Clarke

Development in this location is adjacent to pre-existing development and can be served by existing local facilities

Other

Representation ID: 95707

Received: 04/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Sarah Watt

I object to site 64 due to the proximity of The Holy Well

No

Representation ID: 95731

Received: 04/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Pete Middleton

The location should be kept as commercial as it is now and not housing. Jobs and services are important in the town centre.

No

Representation ID: 95782

Received: 04/03/2025

Respondent: Stratford upon Avon District Council

Whilst broadly supporting the strategic objectives, I do not agree with this cluster being included in the plan as set out.

Yes

Representation ID: 96032

Received: 04/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Andrew Chilton

Southam and surrounding area has good transport connections and the road potential for more infrastructure upgrades in the future

Yes

Representation ID: 96200

Received: 04/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Peter Sinclair

Would provide modest expansion of southam which has adequate infrastructure in place including schools (primary and secondary)
Non green belt land