Yes

Representation ID: 103478

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Carol Jones

Support strategic growth locations on non-greenbelt land.

No

Representation ID: 103613

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Peter Scott

The proposed development will lead to merging of our parishes which is at odds with protecting and enhancing our environmental assets a key objective 12 in SWLP plan. The size and scale of the proposal would subsume Bishops Tachbrook and destroy the community and environment surrounding the existing parishes

Yes

Representation ID: 103682

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Steve Churchill

I believe that all new development should be made only on Non Green Belt or Brown Field sites.

Yes

Representation ID: 103741

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Steve Churchill

I believe that all new development should be made only on Non Green Belt or Brown Field sites.

No

Representation ID: 103844

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Susie Evans

SG10 should be reconsidered due to adverse environmental, heritage, and infrastructure impacts.

No

Representation ID: 103853

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Dr Diana Taulbut

Whatever happened to the Country Park which was supposed to separate Heathcote and Bishops Tachbrook in the current Local Plan?? Is the 100 yard miserable strip of land aroud the S edge of Heathcote supposed to be it? Surely Heathcote has encroached far enough, too far really, and to develop Bishop's Tachbrook to meet it is completely disrespecting the identity of the ancient settlement. There has already been far too much development and urbanisation in the south of Leamington.

No

Representation ID: 103987

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs N Bobe

SG10 does not fit with the Local Neighbourhood Plan. Previously, Warwick District Council and Bishops Tachbrook Parish Council have refused planning permission on this land (W/14/1049), due to it's significance in maintaining the gap between Bishops Tachbrook and Whitnash, providing "... an important gateway into the village due to the relationship of the topography, listed buildings, conservation area and the natural environment of fields, hills, trees and St. Chad’s Church on higher ground as was recognised as important by the Inspector at the Public Inquiry in 2006." (para 1.5, REPRESENTATION FROM BISHOP’S TACHBROOK PARISH COUNCIL APPEAL REFERENCE: APP/T3725/W/15/3134611, 2/11/2015).

No

Representation ID: 104003

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Kay Haycock

Deliverability is impossible due to infrastructure deficits, with no clear plans to mitigate traffic congestion or environmental degradation.
Inconsistent with NPPF principles, particularly regarding environmental sustainability and preserving distinct settlement identities i.e., that of Bishop’s Tachbrook village.
Conclusion
SG10 should be reconsidered due to adverse environmental, heritage, and infrastructure impacts. This site contains archeological areas of interest, where a historic windmill and associated works remain. This area is known locally and mapped as Windmill Hill. This area should be protected, for future generations. The topography of the site is important, in it's surroundings.

Yes

Representation ID: 104095

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Amanda Waters

Close to exisiting employment and transport links

No

Representation ID: 104096

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Louis haycock

Deliverability is impossible due to infrastructure deficits, with no clear plans to mitigate traffic congestion or environmental degradation.
Inconsistent with NPPF principles, particularly regarding environmental sustainability and preserving distinct settlement identities i.e., that of Bishop’s Tachbrook village.
Conclusion
SG10 should be reconsidered due to adverse environmental, heritage, and infrastructure impacts. This site contains archeological areas of interest, where a historic windmill and associated works remain. This area is known locally and mapped as Windmill Hill. This area should be protected, for future generations. The topography of the site is important, in it's surroundings.

Yes

Representation ID: 104301

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Carl Bergstrom

yes

Yes

Representation ID: 104433

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Sharon Ward

I support the proposed strategic growth location SG10 because it focuses development on non-greenbelt land, using existing infrastructure rather than requiring costly new roads and services. This approach enables much-needed housing while avoiding damage to rural landscapes, important footpaths, and the area’s heritage. By building where facilities and transport links already exist, SG10 supports sustainable, well-planned growth that fits the local context. It offers a practical way to meet housing needs without harming the environment or quality of life for residents, making it a responsible and balanced option for future development in the area.

No

Representation ID: 104469

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Judith Ann Cobham-Lowe OBE

SG10 comprises prime farmland, continuously food-producing since 1086 (beans and peas that year). We need that food.

Other sites are more suitable. Especially those ALREADY AGREED elsewhere in S Warwickshire, but not yet fully developed.

SG10 includes 3 historic buildings, the 1650s Bishop of Lichfield's Tithe Barn, a 'New' Farm from early C19th and associated buildings. Their curtilege must be protected by law.

The area is already overdeveloped (4,200 houses since 2015) creating already unacceptable cumulative traffic pressure.

Thriving, documented, wildlife - buzzards, red kites, deer, badgers, newts, - which feed on those fields. They don't deserve to die.

No

Representation ID: 104524

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Ms Ailsa Chambers

The independent village characteristics of Bishops Tachbrook are under severe threat owing to the constant sprawl of development between the village and Leamington. It is not clear why this location has been selected over and above other options. The loss of prime agricultural land does not justify the proposal. We already experience traffic congestion as a result of previous developments and there are insufficient infrastructure plans to mitigate further population growth. The environmental loss of natural habitats from further development cannot be mitigated satisfactorily by any measure - too much has been lost already.

Other

Representation ID: 104547

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Ian Dunning

YES ONLY IF the development is high density, linked with public transport and active travel infrastructure.

Do not build detached homes anywhere.
Painted bicycle gutters are NOT active travel infrastructure.
A bus is a bad public transport solution.

Yes

Representation ID: 104577

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Kay Williams

Yes as it is not green belt land.

Yes

Representation ID: 104620

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Ian Dunning

Stop building sprawling car-dependent suburbia. You are killing people with these decisions. Cars kill people, stop making people have to get in their cars to get to places. Build high density walkable neighbourhoods with active travel infrastructure.

Paint is not cycling infrastructure.
Buses are bad public transport.
Don't build any detached houses.

Yes

Representation ID: 104660

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Sally Newington

This area is not affecting green belt and has access to a good transport infrastructure

Yes

Representation ID: 104847

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Ms Elizabeth Heath

This development does not take land out of greenbelt and therefore has a lower negative impact on biodiversity. It's also closer to existing infrastructure and services

Yes

Representation ID: 104931

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Charlotte Holme

This could be a suitable site for development given existing development in the area. As long as the infrastructure is put in place to cope with additional traffic, give people local services, schools, health services etc

No

Representation ID: 105227

Received: 26/02/2025

Respondent: Stratford upon Avon District Council

Bishops Tachbrook Group – SG10 – OBJECT: Significant harm to the character of the landscape and increasing traffic congestion to JLR and Aston Martin on B4100 with additional traffic impacts on neighbouring villages. Lack of rail connectivity.

No

Representation ID: 105444

Received: 26/02/2025

Respondent: Jo Hope

I have several objections regarding the proposed housing developments. Firstly, the environmental impact would increase pollution and noise. There would also be heightened traffic and parking issues. Wellesbourne has already expanded significantly beyond its village status but lacks essential town amenities. Local schools are full and traffic problems are worsening, which would only be exacerbated by new homes. Furthermore, areas are at risk of flooding, and the SUDS scheme has failed to function properly. Lastly, the proposed sites would take over valuable farmland, undermining our self-sufficiency in food production.

Yes

Representation ID: 105554

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Alexander Hargie

SG09/SG10/SG11 because of the immediate connection to the M40 and as a logical continuation of the development of the land south of Leamington Spa and supported by the infrastructure already in place.

Yes

Representation ID: 105666

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Edward Heynes

If substantial growth is to occur in Stratford, it should occur on the northern side due to better access to Stratford Parkway station, the strategic highway network, and existing employment. A relief road must be positioned on the southern side, linking the A34 with the A46, but proposals around the eastern side are not feasible. Additionally, growth should focus on new settlements near public transport interchanges, including railway stations and access to Birmingham Airport. Options around X1, X2, SG09, 10, 11, G1, SG13, 14, and B1 appear to be the most sensible.

No

Representation ID: 105681

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: Bernard Keavy

SG10 Bishops Tachbrook - This will cause significant harm to the character of the landscape and will cause more traffic congestion to JLR and Aston Martin on B4100. It will also cause heavy traffic in neighbouring villages.

No

Representation ID: 105815

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Roy Standley

The present Government is building more homes without considering the wider effects. We do not have the budget or infrastructure to support the influx of people coming to this island. Infrastructure needs to be provided before any more houses are built.

No

Representation ID: 105976

Received: 19/02/2025

Respondent: Alison Johnston

There is scant woodland which you can explore and enjoy in south Warwickshire. This is a lifeline for people living in south Leamington and Wellesbourne. Without this the quality of life in this area will deteriorate.

The only other options for walks are places like Charlecote park or Compton Verny, which both require payment, or private land which were not able to enjoy.

There are plenty of other sites in this area which can be developed without destroyed a cherished area.

While the plans are not to build on Oakley Wood, building right up to it will affect local wildlife and biodiversity, leading to more litter, more danger from traffic, light and air pollution.

This is should be an absolute no and surprised it was ever proposed

No

Representation ID: 106075

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Patricia McDonaugh

Such developments would urbanise these areas, resulting in significant harm to the general character of the landscapes, and have an overall detrimental effect. Wellesbourne has expanded considerably over recent years, without infrastructure to meet the demand on all services in the village. Medical services, dentists and educational facilities are heavily subscribed, and there is an existing and increasing traffic and parking problem in Wellesbourne. This is all too apparent near the school in Mountford Close, where there is no effective traffic management, drivers regularly ignore road markings, park on footways, resort to driving along footways when meeting head on vehicles travelling in the opposite direction, plus use any resident's drive as a turning point. Also, a driver travelling in the opposite direction to the main stream of traffic, opting to reverse back down Mountford Close towards the main school gate/road junction amongst parked and moving traffic ,food waste bins, parents and children making their way to the main school gate. The Newbold Road in Wellesbourne is also often clogged with parked and moving traffic. To introduce more through traffic to Wellesbourne would create even greater congestion, and is untenable.

No

Representation ID: 106277

Received: 04/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Paul Darnell

Bishops Tachbrook Group – SG10 – OBJECT:
Additional strategic growth in this area will cause significant harm to the character of the landscape and what was once a small village. There is already heavily congested traffic commuting to JLR and Aston Martin on B4100. There is a lack of rail connectivity.

No

Representation ID: 106399

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Elliot Cooke

I strongly object to the proposed development sites X1, SG09, SG10, SG15, SG16, and the additional fields to the east and west of Sherbourne due to their adverse impact on infrastructure, environmental sustainability, village character, and traffic congestion. These proposals contradict the South Warwickshire Local Plan’s vision for sustainable, well-connected, and environmentally responsible development.