Yes

Representation ID: 94535

Received: 03/03/2025

Respondent: Mr John Steen

Not Green Belt land

Yes

Representation ID: 94841

Received: 03/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Ian Clarke

Development in this location is adjacent to pre-existing development and does not undermine green belt policy that has served the country well for many years. It is accessible to the M40.

No

Representation ID: 95069

Received: 03/03/2025

Respondent: Dr Ruth Dixon

There has already been too much development in this area and without the right infra-structure being put in

No

Representation ID: 95171

Received: 04/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Edward Wilson

The infrastructure will not match the schooling, medical, transport,etc needs which are already under immense pressure. It also covers areas of Heritage - the Roman camp which conflicts with both the tourism and heritage aspirations.

Yes

Representation ID: 95423

Received: 04/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Hannah Molloy

Better to increase current development in the South of Leamington/Warwick towards the motorways. Not Green Belt, close to transport links, combined infrastructure with recent developments in that area. South of river in and so residents do not need to cross bottle neck bridges to visit commercial, industrial and retail.

No

Representation ID: 96149

Received: 04/03/2025

Respondent: Aaron Thomas

Should be reconsidered due to adverse environmental, heritage, and infrastructure impacts.

Yes

Representation ID: 96223

Received: 04/03/2025

Respondent: Mr James Pateman

Build housing on non-greenbelt land.

No

Representation ID: 96695

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Adrian Franklin

Bishops Tachbrook is a community village and has currently undergone change adding more properties. The infrastructure can't cope now let alone with any more additions to the community. There are currently enough new developments around us so more would make it intolerable. These proposals, along with what is already developed, would make this nice rural village turn into a small town. There is enough traffic around the area no especially following recent developments. Any more developments in this area needs to be avoided.

Other

Representation ID: 96750

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Alcester Town Council

Alcester Town Council, Arrow with Weethley Parish Council, Kinwarton Parish Council, Wixford Parish Council and Great Alne Parish Council (together referred to as Alcester Parishes Group or ‘APG’) has no comment.

Yes

Representation ID: 96961

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Margaret Jeffery

N/A

No

Representation ID: 97595

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Ms Anna Avino

Leamington has already exploded in the past five years. The roads are jammed, the services are overstretched and the vast housing developements and population explosion is changimg the character of the area and making it unpleasant. Infrastructure cannot cope with all the new 29,000 homes being concentrated in a few massive developments in the area particularly south Leamington and Whitnash which is gridlocked. These houses need to be fully dispersed across the whole of warwickshire with every town and village taking a handful of them. This woudl be a fairer, more sustainable appproach as the infratrusture wil alsways play catch-up.

Yes

Representation ID: 97646

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Melanie Elkington

This is not Green belt so would seem to be a sensible place to build houses

Yes

Representation ID: 97663

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Kate Murphy

Opportunity to create a sustainable neighbourhood with all the facilities needed for residents . Maximise walking and cycling links to the retail site and train station. Quantum of s106 generated from the large developments alongside each other with fund amenities . Infrastructure around sg09 -sg11 has already been upgraded therefore it already has capacity for new developments to feed into .

Yes

Representation ID: 97753

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Gary Jeffery

N/A

Other

Representation ID: 97854

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs cynthia bettany

Although I would accept the inclusion of this site as it is already in close proximity to current infrastucture and labour force, the impact on the views from Chesterton windmill would be detrimental and it maybe in an issue with the heritage issues of the Fosse Way.

Yes

Representation ID: 97873

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Tracey Hasnaoui

not green belt land

Yes

Representation ID: 97881

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Tracey Hasnaoui

Non greenbelt land suitable for development

Yes

Representation ID: 98156

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: Miss Lesley Andrews

Infrastructure on the roads have already been completed to accommodate new houses. Itis also positioned within easy reach of the M40 for city commuters.

Yes

Representation ID: 98214

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Anne Teed

Dose not include green belt land.

Yes

Representation ID: 98300

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Daine Davis

Suitable for redevelopment, with good road links

No

Representation ID: 98371

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Jonathan Partridge

This would subsume the village of Bishops Tachbrook into the southern Leamington conurbation severely impacting its character as a village community. This area is already over developed and the road infrastructure (Europa Way and Tachbrook Road) are extremely congested at peak times. There is already insufficient infrastructure in this area in terms of road capacity, schools, doctors, sewerage system, hospitals etc. Development of this site would exacerbate all these problems.

Yes

Representation ID: 98418

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Simon Wright

Support development on non-green belt land.

No

Representation ID: 98427

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Susan Partridge

This would severely impact the character of Bishops Tachbrook as a village community, turning it into a 'suburb' of the southern Leamington conurbation. The area is already over developed and the road infrastructure (Europa Way and Tachbrook Road) is badly congested at peak times. The services infrastructure in this area is already struggling to cope in terms of road capacity, schools, doctors, hospital, sewerage system, etc. and these problems will not be solved by further intensive development at this site.

No

Representation ID: 98745

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Doug Wallace

This is too close to other areas proposed for development.

No

Representation ID: 98849

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: Ms Jacqui Waldron

The village has seen thousands of new homes built recently in the parish, numbers which far exceed those in the adopted Local Plan. Bishop’s Tachbrook is vastly overdeveloped already and the proposal does not align with the policies and objectives outlined with the local authority’s development plan. The two exits out of Bishop’s Tachbrook onto Banbury Road are overwhelmed. There have been a number of traffic accidents as it's virtually impossible to pull out safely at peak times. More traffic from the properties would worsen this situation. The infrastructure is just not there to support this volume of additional housing.

Yes

Representation ID: 98860

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: AC Lloyd - Sites 152, 156 & 157

Agent: Delta Planning

AC Lloyd fully supports Strategic Growth Location SG10 (Bishops Tachbrook). This location includes the following sites submitted by A C Lloyd through the call for sites: Land to the north of Mallory Gardens (ref: 152); Land west Mallory Gardens (ref: 156) and Land west of Bishops Tachbrook (ref: 157).

This Growth Option is consistent with the identification of Bishops Tachbrook as a Growth Village suitable for new housing in the Warwick District Local Plan (2017) and the AC Lloyd sites provide a logical sustainable expansion to the north and west of the village.

Yes

Representation ID: 98997

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Lynda McCarthy

outside designated 'green belt'

No

Representation ID: 99045

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Sally Ashley

Objection based on placing additional pressures on existing infrastructure which already cannot cope, increased traffic, noise and pollution, destruction and loss of ecology in an area which has already lost much due to major house building at The Asps, Europa Way and Gallows Hill, destruction of rural views and picturesque approach into Warwick town

No

Representation ID: 99092

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: Charlotte Morgan

Would have a negative impact on the rural / village character of Bishops Tachbrook and Barford, therefore is not aligned with the principle of maintaining the beauty of the area. Would add to existing traffic problems.

Yes

Representation ID: 99131

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: Mr John Jones

Development of an area not containing green belt land.