Yes

Representation ID: 88367

Received: 15/02/2025

Respondent: Mr richard madder

However I object to any "large-scale development such as a new settlement". Any development must be limited.

Yes

Representation ID: 88381

Received: 15/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Maurice Stokes

Brown field site where once green field sites! Debates and discussion about had why these sites should be used for economic growth of the area. Subsequently over time that economic growth never happened or was superseded by other social factors. These sites should be consider as the primary location to be repurposed for development no matter the argument against. Chasing around, consuming greenbelt for economic growth is mans greatest folly.

Yes

Representation ID: 88394

Received: 15/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Barrie Hayles

Brownfield land should be considered first for possible housing and other needs and any part it can play in reducing the loss of open or green space is vitally important.

Yes

Representation ID: 88396

Received: 15/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Annette Pharo

It is of paramount importance to use all available brownfield sites and other underused or derelict that buildings for development before any greenfield sites such as Wilmcote are considered. There should be compulsary purchase of these brownfield sites/ decaying buildings to improve the local environment as well as providing the extra homes required.

Yes

Representation ID: 88449

Received: 15/02/2025

Respondent: Mr A Patrick

Yes, maximise the potential of the brownfield sites. The plan should focus on building affordable housing in the cities and towns where the housing is needed and infrastructure exists, rather than building on the peripheries of our towns and villages, where the infrastructure is weakest.

Yes

Representation ID: 88558

Received: 16/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Sidney Syson

A sensible strategy.

Yes

Representation ID: 88647

Received: 17/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Ida Marjorie Brown

Agree

Yes

Representation ID: 88696

Received: 17/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Gillian Browne

This will have less impact on the environment.

Other

Representation ID: 88745

Received: 17/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Jerry Corless

Assessing the suitability for use of brownfield land for development is useful, hopefully similar assessments of Greenfield land use similar criterion.
It seems to be a bit strange to consider using brownfield land for agriculture as it would be very expensive to return it to a suitable state.

Yes

Representation ID: 88794

Received: 17/02/2025

Respondent: Miss Erin Williams

This local plan needs to strongly promote use of urban brownfield land, because it preserves green field land for agricultural and leisure purposes, as well as adhering to 20 minute neighbourhood principles as brownfields are almost always close to local amenities.
Brown field sites often contain infrastructure and are close to amenities. We need to maximise the potential of the brownfield sites. There must be a commitment to focusing on building affordable housing in the cities and towns where the housing is needed and infrastructure exists, rather than building on the peripheries of our towns, where the infrastructure is weakest.

Yes

Representation ID: 88930

Received: 18/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Simon Durk

Support looking at urban sites. Be prepared to change the use of sites; build houses or flats in unused offices and retail premises. The old high street is never coming back; moving people in to live in this type of urban site could be very good for creating a new type of community there.

Yes

Representation ID: 88936

Received: 18/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Simon Durk

Definitely use brownfield sites first and urban brownfield for preference

Yes

Representation ID: 88984

Received: 19/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Robert Eynon

Development is required and is inevitable to support population growth and Brownfield sites must be the priority focus to preserve our communities and natural and archealogical historic sites in thw Warwickshire area

Yes

Representation ID: 89000

Received: 19/02/2025

Respondent: Salford Priors Parish Council

1. By prioritizing brownfield land for development is a positive step toward reducing pressure on greenfield sites and making efficient use of previously developed land.
2. Ensuring that brownfield sites outside urban areas are assessed for their sustainability aligns with the need for well-planned growth that supports infrastructure, services, and accessibility.
3. Plan proposals must be supported by robust infrastructure planning and service provision to avoid creating isolated or car-dependent communities.

Other

Representation ID: 89014

Received: 19/02/2025

Respondent: Stratford upon Avon District Council

Certainly in an urban context. But in rural areas using brownfield land for housing sometimes leads to incongruous and detrimental housing development, sporadic and isolated from facilities or services. Land that had been neglected or wilfully allowed to become derelict should not automatically be considered for development.

Yes

Representation ID: 89118

Received: 19/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Sara Bird

Agree, brownfield should be prioritised

Yes

Representation ID: 89126

Received: 19/02/2025

Respondent: Ms Julie Hudson

Yes, makes sense.

Yes

Representation ID: 89143

Received: 19/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Helen Logan

Preference should given to sustainability of brownfield land with the proviso that brownfield land may be contaminated and unsuitable for agriculture,. Decontaminated brownfield land should be included in residential uses as happens in urban areas.

Yes

Representation ID: 89200

Received: 19/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Suzanna Hughes

Brownfield Land should always be used for development over greenbelt land as set out in the policy for the importance of protecting from urban sprawl and the loss of open landscape.

Other

Representation ID: 89315

Received: 20/02/2025

Respondent: L B

Brownfield land must be used first.

Yes

Representation ID: 89550

Received: 20/02/2025

Respondent: Miss Emily Carleton

Urban brownfield land should always be the priority for new developments! We should maximise the potential of these sites instead of building on dwindling green belt land. Brownfield sites are also closer to amenities and help with car dependency.

Yes

Representation ID: 89749

Received: 21/02/2025

Respondent: Compton Verney

n/a

Other

Representation ID: 89828

Received: 21/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Christine Oatridge

We Must protect against urban sprawl.
Brownfield sites must be used in preference to Greenfield sites.
Greenfield sites must be protected at all costs.

Other

Representation ID: 89831

Received: 21/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Lina Rodriguez

Brownfield sites should always be used before greenbelt land is to be even considered. The irreversible loss of greenbelt should be an absolute last resort

Other

Representation ID: 89835

Received: 21/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Daphne Davis

I feel using brownfield land for development is always preferable to using green belt land.

Yes

Representation ID: 89851

Received: 21/02/2025

Respondent: Mr SIMON BEACHAM

Site BW: - Brownfield sites should be fully investigated and feasibilities prepared to save our green belt locations at all costs. Once they're gone, they're gone forever. A terrible legacy to our following generations.

Yes

Representation ID: 89879

Received: 21/02/2025

Respondent: Dr Stephen Browett

Brownfield land should always be considered over greenfield land as a way of protecting from urban sprawl and enabling a more considered planning approach to development.

Yes

Representation ID: 89889

Received: 21/02/2025

Respondent: Ms Holly Whittaker

Brownfield land should always be used for development over green belt land as set out in the policy for the importance of protecting from urban sprawl and the loss of open landscape.

Yes

Representation ID: 90010

Received: 22/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Fiona Macvie

Brownfield sites are always preferable to greenbelt to protect urban blight and the loss of open landscapes.

Yes

Representation ID: 90155

Received: 23/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Maria Giblin

We should be investing and developing Brown field sites for communities, jobs etc not making people move out to other areas away from families.