Object

Representation ID: 5418

Received: 24/09/2009

Respondent: John Baxter

The Kings Hill proposal should not be turned into a built environment.

Object

Representation ID: 5458

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Mike Cheeseman

It needs to be made clear that all these aspects are considered "up front" and agreement to them is a fundamental part of the process. Hence there must be apposition adopted at the time the Core Strategy developments are proposed. This should include drainage/flooding etc.

Object

Representation ID: 5491

Received: 27/09/2009

Respondent: Joanna Illingworth

The Local Planning Authority already has Design Guides. It would be helpful if more use was made of them in scrutinizing current planning applications.

Support

Representation ID: 5552

Received: 22/09/2009

Respondent: Mr and Mrs G Morgan

Number of people: 2

Support.

Support

Representation ID: 5680

Received: 20/09/2009

Respondent: Jane Boynton

Support.

Support

Representation ID: 5730

Received: 22/09/2009

Respondent: Roger Warren

Support.

Support

Representation ID: 5790

Received: 24/09/2009

Respondent: Philip Wilson

Where gardens are not possible eg flats adequate space must be found to provide green growing areas in the form of local collectives or establishing new allotments else we run the risk of healthy lifestyles being reduced

Object

Representation ID: 5830

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Ms Alison Cox

I disagree that high quality design has been implemented in recent years - Warwick Gates, for example, is lacking in adequate green spaces and housing is too dense.

Support

Representation ID: 5870

Received: 13/10/2009

Respondent: Pamela Payne

Support.

Support

Representation ID: 5947

Received: 28/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Alan Roberts

Support.

Support

Representation ID: 6050

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Paul Skidmore

Support.

Object

Representation ID: 6146

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Richard and Judy Swallow

Number of people: 2

Object

Object

Representation ID: 6228

Received: 13/10/2009

Respondent: John, Elaine and Sarah Lewis

Object

Support

Representation ID: 6289

Received: 24/09/2009

Respondent: Ross Telford

Support

Object

Representation ID: 6371

Received: 18/09/2009

Respondent: John Jessamine

Object.

Object

Representation ID: 6466

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: graham leeke

The opportunity to redevelop brown field sites along the canal and rivers is not being grasped.

Support

Representation ID: 6751

Received: 22/09/2009

Respondent: Milverton New Allotments Association Ltd

support

Object

Representation ID: 6965

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Bishops Tachbrook Parish Council

The preferred option does not give any indication of the form any framework would take. For that reason, we object to the Preferred Option.

Support

Representation ID: 7024

Received: 24/09/2009

Respondent: Norton Lindsey Parish Council

Support.

Object

Representation ID: 7607

Received: 17/09/2009

Respondent: Mr George Jones

Object

Support

Representation ID: 7621

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Coal Pension Properties Ltd

Agent: Nathaniel Lichfield & Partners

Support promoting and delivering high quality design, however need to adopt a commercial approach to design features including signage.

Object

Representation ID: 33595

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Ray Bullen

The preferred option does not give any indication of the form any framework would take

Support

Representation ID: 33695

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Mr T Steele

Agent: Savills (L&P) Ltd

Support

Support

Representation ID: 33740

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Sharba Homes

Agent: PJPlanning

Support

Support

Representation ID: 33775

Received: 28/08/2009

Respondent: Shirley Estates

Agent: Davis Planning Partnership

Support

Support

Representation ID: 33779

Received: 28/08/2009

Respondent: Shirley Estates

Agent: Davis Planning Partnership

Support

Support

Representation ID: 33843

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Gallagher Estates

Support