Support
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 2656
Received: 14/09/2009
Respondent: John Arnold
Support.
Comment
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 2713
Received: 10/09/2009
Respondent: Mrs Margaret Devitt
Leamington Spa building should have some originality - not merely recreate what can be seen everywhere else e.g. on the Ford site it could be very new and modern but must be good and not too high.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 2771
Received: 09/09/2009
Respondent: Pauline Neale
The design of houses should be overseen by the district council not left to chance and wishes of developers to build as cheaply as possible.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 2858
Received: 11/09/2009
Respondent: Mr Robert Butcher
Object.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 2897
Received: 11/09/2009
Respondent: Susan Butcher
Object.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 3112
Received: 17/09/2000
Respondent: Mr Anthony Morris
I object to the development south of Harbury Lane in the Parish of Bishops Tachbrook.
Support
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 3298
Received: 20/09/2009
Respondent: Mr David John Bowers
If this gets rid of the car park in Barracks Street Warwick I am all for it!
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 3354
Received: 10/09/2009
Respondent: Mr Terence Kemp
Object
Support
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 3419
Received: 16/09/2009
Respondent: Mrs M Kane
Support
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 3591
Received: 16/09/2009
Respondent: Mr Owen
object
Comment
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 3616
Received: 22/09/2009
Respondent: Sport England
The definition of good high quality design is subjective. The LPA should not be closed to non-vernacular /conservation design being put forward by architects and designers. The use of MADE should more wide spread as part of the planning process, to assist officers in their decision making where design is an issue
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 3726
Received: 23/09/2009
Respondent: Mr Richard Brookes
As mentioned previously, we are missing an opportunity to renew deprived areas and optimise the use of brown field sites.
Support
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 3769
Received: 15/09/2009
Respondent: Mr Dennis Michael Crips
Support
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 3937
Received: 24/09/2009
Respondent: Debbie Wiggins
You have been advised by PAS to consider the efects of climate change on the built environment. Local development documents will have an important role in shaping adaptation responses and building resilience eg, urban heat island.
At no point in their advice do they advocate the approach you are taking - which is tantamount to inaction. These documents should exist now, you should have found it virtually impossible to produce a 'preferred option' without them. What is your explanation to how you managed to ignore advice about the impact of building 4000 homes in the same place.
Comment
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 4109
Received: 24/09/2009
Respondent: Ms Angela Clarke
It's a good sentence.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 4212
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: Onkar Mann
I believe that the council should take a more prescriptive approach with defined rules & policies, rather than a strategic view.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 4399
Received: 11/09/2009
Respondent: Andrew, Julie, Eleanor, Henry Day
Proposed developments will effectively join Bishops Tachbrook to Whitnash, Leamington and Warwick conurbation. Leaving a field or two as an area of restraint does not provide legally binding surety that these won't be consumed in time.
Support
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 4457
Received: 24/09/2009
Respondent: Andrea Telford
support
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 4472
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: Malkit Ram
Object to Kings Hill site:
Negative effect on surrounding housing and community.
Support
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 4564
Received: 22/09/2009
Respondent: Southern Windy Arbour Area Residents' Association
support
Support
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 4634
Received: 23/09/2009
Respondent: Mr S Morris
support
Support
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 4635
Received: 23/09/2009
Respondent: Mr S Morris
support
Support
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 4729
Received: 23/10/2009
Respondent: V Gill Peppitt
support
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 4900
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: Vera Leeke
The opportunity to develop brownfield sites along the canals and rivers is not being grasped
Support
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 5013
Received: 08/10/2009
Respondent: Mr Graham Harrison
Qualified support - but again details are missing.
Support
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 5174
Received: 22/09/2009
Respondent: Mr Barry Betts
In principal
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 5237
Received: 23/09/2009
Respondent: Sonia Owczarek
Object.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 5298
Received: 23/10/2009
Respondent: Lindsay Wood
object
Support
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 5314
Received: 23/09/2009
Respondent: J. N. Price
Clause 18.8 identifies the need for further work and it is essential that a framework for this established ahead of any development occurring and which can be consistently applied to all subsequent developments.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 5366
Received: 23/09/2009
Respondent: SEAN DEELY
No detail is provided in the Core Strategy Preferred Options Paper