Support

Representation ID: 4456

Received: 24/09/2009

Respondent: Andrea Telford

support

Object

Representation ID: 4480

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Brian Hier

Object to site at Kings Hill
Currently used for crops and livestock as well as habitat to wildlife, which is disappearing elsewhere.

Support

Representation ID: 4563

Received: 22/09/2009

Respondent: Southern Windy Arbour Area Residents' Association

support

Support

Representation ID: 4633

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Mr S Morris

support

Object

Representation ID: 4846

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Mr. Andrew Clarke

Object.

Object

Representation ID: 4899

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Vera Leeke

No.

Object

Representation ID: 4908

Received: 22/09/2009

Respondent: Mrs Joyce A Green

Object to Kings Hill site:
Essential green belt areas maintained. Natural habitat for wildlife. Green areas, woods, forests are lungs of the planet; their destruction will add to climate change.

Object

Representation ID: 4923

Received: 22/09/2009

Respondent: L Hughes

Good design mentioned throughout document. Nebulous comment - means different things to different people.

Object

Representation ID: 4963

Received: 21/09/2009

Respondent: Richard Monday

Object to Thickthorn site:
Massive development in Kenilworth will destroy character of town.

Support

Representation ID: 5012

Received: 08/10/2009

Respondent: Mr Graham Harrison

Yes

Object

Representation ID: 5173

Received: 22/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Barry Betts

It has a reasonable policy, but is then happy to build high density, low cost housing. I suspect (by definition) this will not be very attractive.

Object

Representation ID: 5236

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Sonia Owczarek

Object.

Object

Representation ID: 5297

Received: 23/10/2009

Respondent: Lindsay Wood

vague

Support

Representation ID: 5312

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: J. N. Price

Support.

Object

Representation ID: 5365

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: SEAN DEELY

No detail is provided in the Core Strategy Preferred Options Paper

Object

Representation ID: 5417

Received: 24/09/2009

Respondent: John Baxter

The Kings Hill proposal should not be turned into a built environment.

Object

Representation ID: 5457

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Mike Cheeseman

It needs to be made clear that all these aspects are considered "up front" and agreement to them is a fundamental part of the process. Hence there must be apposition adopted at the time the Core Strategy developments are proposed. This should include drainage/flooding etc.

Support

Representation ID: 5551

Received: 22/09/2009

Respondent: Mr and Mrs G Morgan

Number of people: 2

Support.

Object

Representation ID: 5597

Received: 20/09/2009

Respondent: George Martin

I believe that sections 18 Built Environment and Section 19 Sustainable Buildings and possibly even Section 20 Flood Risk should be combined.

Support

Representation ID: 5679

Received: 20/09/2009

Respondent: Jane Boynton

Provided that adequate importance placed on green growing areas.

Support

Representation ID: 5729

Received: 22/09/2009

Respondent: Roger Warren

Support.

Support

Representation ID: 5789

Received: 24/09/2009

Respondent: Philip Wilson

It is important when designing/planning a built environment that adequate importance is placed upon green space and growing land in the shape of gardens and allotments.

Support

Representation ID: 5869

Received: 13/10/2009

Respondent: Pamela Payne

Support.

Support

Representation ID: 5946

Received: 28/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Alan Roberts

But the policy of government and developers to build tight density estates does not lend itself to quality design and environment.

Support

Representation ID: 6048

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Paul Skidmore

Support.

Support

Representation ID: 6049

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Paul Skidmore

Support.

Object

Representation ID: 6227

Received: 13/10/2009

Respondent: John, Elaine and Sarah Lewis

Object

Support

Representation ID: 6288

Received: 24/09/2009

Respondent: Ross Telford

Support

Object

Representation ID: 6370

Received: 18/09/2009

Respondent: John Jessamine

Object.

Object

Representation ID: 6465

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: graham leeke

object