Showing comments and forms 31 to 60 of 122

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 2461

Received: 08/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Connolly

Representation Summary:

Object.

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 2506

Received: 09/09/2009

Respondent: British Waterways

Representation Summary:

Yes. Within the "follow on" SPD relating to design, the historic waterway vernacular and the interaction of the waterway with the built form should be key concepts, which inform local style and help to create a sense of place.

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 2577

Received: 10/09/2009

Respondent: Mr R.A and Mrs B.E Donaldson

Number of people: 2

Representation Summary:

Agree that new developments must be of high quality and sympathetic to the surroundings.

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 2655

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: John Arnold

Representation Summary:

Support.

Comment

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 2707

Received: 10/09/2009

Respondent: Mrs Margaret Devitt

Representation Summary:

The future developments in Leamington Spa (especially Station and Ford areas) should show some respect for the very special/unique style of domestic architecture in Leamington. Leamington is essentially a classical and stucco town. Please do not allow designate that are merely currently fashionable.

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 2770

Received: 09/09/2009

Respondent: Pauline Neale

Representation Summary:

It is aware of its responsibilities.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 2857

Received: 11/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Robert Butcher

Representation Summary:

Object.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 2896

Received: 11/09/2009

Respondent: Susan Butcher

Representation Summary:

Object.

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 2950

Received: 15/09/2009

Respondent: Barford, Sherbourne and Wasperton Joint Parish Council

Representation Summary:

Support.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 3008

Received: 16/09/2009

Respondent: Mrs and Mr J Parr and Cotterill

Representation Summary:

We question the need when there are so many existing empty homes.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 3009

Received: 16/09/2009

Respondent: Mrs and Mr J Parr and Cotterill

Representation Summary:

Building new homes is too harmful to the environment.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 3111

Received: 17/09/2000

Respondent: Mr Anthony Morris

Representation Summary:

A greater spread of development is required, too much emphasis on the land to the south of Warwick, Leamington Spa and Whitnash.

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 3187

Received: 15/09/2009

Respondent: John Murphy

Representation Summary:

Support.

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 3242

Received: 20/09/2009

Respondent: mrs stella moore

Representation Summary:

housing needs to be sustainable and high quality

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 3297

Received: 20/09/2009

Respondent: Mr David John Bowers

Representation Summary:

I support it.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 3353

Received: 10/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Terence Kemp

Representation Summary:

Object

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 3418

Received: 16/09/2009

Respondent: Mrs M Kane

Representation Summary:

Support

Comment

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 3493

Received: 18/09/2009

Respondent: Mrs E. Appleby

Representation Summary:

There is not enough information.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 3590

Received: 16/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Owen

Representation Summary:

object

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 3725

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Richard Brookes

Representation Summary:

As mentioned previously, we are missing an opportunity to renew deprived areas and optimise the use of brown field sites.

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 3767

Received: 15/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Dennis Michael Crips

Representation Summary:

Support

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 3768

Received: 15/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Dennis Michael Crips

Representation Summary:

Support

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 3917

Received: 22/09/2009

Respondent: Patricia Diane Freeman

Representation Summary:

No not too many people knew of Coventry ideas to ? with Warwick.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 3928

Received: 24/09/2009

Respondent: Debbie Wiggins

Representation Summary:

CABE has produced documentation about building for life - they suggest 15 priorities. Please let us know how you plan to incorporate the following:

1. reduce energy demand
2. develop a low carbon and renewable energy portfolio
3. plan for sustainable waste management
4. deal with construction waste
5. turn waste into energy
6. manage surface water and flood risk
7. encourage sustainable water use
8. protect watercourses
9. encourage public transport, walking and cycling
10. reduce car use
11. integrate green infrastructure into urban areas
12. moderate the urban heat island
13. help wildlife adapt to climate change
14. maximise the potential of public space
15. adapt public space to climate change

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 4002

Received: 24/09/2009

Respondent: Mr M Abba

Representation Summary:

too much development to the south of leanington - thsi should be distrbuted around the county

Comment

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 4108

Received: 24/09/2009

Respondent: Ms Angela Clarke

Representation Summary:

High quality design should be a given.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 4143

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Andy Robb

Representation Summary:

You could have done more. There is advice from CABE and PAS on this aspect of the core strategy. Neither advise doing as you have done. Why are you ignoring their advice? Govt best practice says you should take the advice of these experts.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 4211

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Onkar Mann

Representation Summary:

The approach on impact to quality of life for the built environment has not been considered equally for all residents within the district.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 4346

Received: 24/09/2009

Respondent: G Walker

Representation Summary:

Towns special atmosphere threatened by overdevelopment.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 4433

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Robert Johnson

Representation Summary:

Bishops Tachbrook is village with own community and all advantages that this brings. Intended growth would encroach on area between village and Leamington.