Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 93
Received: 03/07/2009
Respondent: Mr G.C. Allman
Warwick Gates is already huge with insufficient infrastructure - e.g. it does not have its own school - and parents are struggling to find local alternatives! Harbury Lane is already, at times a race track, and during rush hour soon clogs up with traffic. In addition, developing south of Harbury Lane, will in effect pull Bishops Tachbrook into the ever expanding Warwick/Whitnash/Leamington conurbation - destroying the rural charm and community of that village - a any individual identity it has - as is rapidy happening with Warwick, Whitnash and Lspa.
Support
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 128
Received: 06/07/2009
Respondent: R A Chapleo
Support
Support
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 192
Received: 11/07/2009
Respondent: Mr Alexander Holmes
I support all the suggested options as they focus housing on areas best able to accommodate new development, without encroaching on the Green Belt.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 214
Received: 03/07/2009
Respondent: Mrs Caroline Baxter
Strongly object, this land makes a break between Leamington, Whitnash and Bishops Tachbrook
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 265
Received: 10/07/2009
Respondent: Patricia Robinson
Warwick Gates has significantly increased traffic. Lack of facilities to support these houses.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 267
Received: 13/07/2009
Respondent: Mr David Jordan
If there are going to be 4000 new homes built in the Warwick Gates & Whitnash areas where are all these people going to work? as the building of new industruial units in the area seems to have come to a standstill. Let alone which school all the children will go to! Where are the facts that this size development needs to be built here.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 301
Received: 17/07/2009
Respondent: Mr David Higgin
No infrastructure to support these houses, lack of school spaces, encroaching on green spaces, traffic levels are already unacceptable in this area during commuting times.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 302
Received: 17/07/2009
Respondent: Mr David Higgin
No infrastructure to support these houses, lack of school spaces, encroaching on green spaces, traffic levels are already unacceptable in this area during commuting times.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 306
Received: 17/07/2009
Respondent: Mrs Sheila Smith
The three developments of Europa Way, Woodside Farm and the land South of Harbury Lane will result in severe traffic problems.
The suggestion of using these areas has been made with benefit of a traffic survey.
Schools, bus services and health centres will be put under considerable strain.
The conurbation of Warwick/Whitnash/Leamington will be even larger and thus less pleasant.
Extra traffic will cause worse air pollution.
The use of such a large swathe of green belt goes against the council's own vision for the area.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 333
Received: 21/07/2009
Respondent: Mr and Mrs D Bolam
No infrastructure to support such building, insufficient school places at present, and traffic at times is horrendous.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 361
Received: 22/07/2009
Respondent: Peter Pounds
All planned sites are not practical - i.e. traffic congestion - more roads - schools - shops - etc. We don not need anymore. What about Heathcote Park Homes - give them some thought.
Support
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 409
Received: 24/07/2009
Respondent: Mr Ian Clarke
Housing allocation here would be appropriate given the better transport links on this side of the urban area
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 439
Received: 27/07/2009
Respondent: Peter Clarke
To put 4200 houses along these areas opposite Warwick Gates would put too much of a stranglehold on the area in pollution; too heavy road traffic, schools could not cope with the influx; NHS would not cope. You would cause another town between Warwick and Whitnash. In short it would be a monumental cock up.
Support
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 490
Received: 24/07/2009
Respondent: Georgina Wilson
Support.
Support
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 561
Received: 27/07/2009
Respondent: Mr A M Webley
Support.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 624
Received: 23/07/2009
Respondent: Mr G.R. Summers
Object.
Support
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 784
Received: 05/08/2009
Respondent: Faye Davis
Support.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 814
Received: 03/08/2009
Respondent: Mrs I.E Rivers
Our rejection concerns traffic congestion in Harbury Lane, building houses on the green belt will bring more traffic which will worsen the air quality in the area.
Schools and health sercices will suffer with the increase of new residents.
No traffic impact survey has been done to determine the effect of all the extra traffic that will converge on us.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 852
Received: 18/08/2009
Respondent: Adrian Farmer
Object, not necessary, infrastructure cannot support this plus environmental damage.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 886
Received: 18/08/2009
Respondent: Mr J C Booth
huses built at Warwick Gates meant reduced water supply to Bishops Tachbrook so if no impact research done then same will happen again.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 887
Received: 18/08/2009
Respondent: Mr J C Booth
The increase in traffic movements will create gridlock needing large amounts of cash to solve infra-structure problems.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 916
Received: 19/08/2009
Respondent: Christine Betts
The area of Harbury Lane / Whitnash cannot support more housng in terms of roads, schooling (which is currently not sufficient anyway) medical/policing etc. Plus section 10.36 of 50% of affordable housing will be too high. warwick gates residents are against this - a balance yes but not 50%.
Support
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 996
Received: 21/08/2009
Respondent: Kirit Marvania
Support
Support
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 1083
Received: 21/08/2009
Respondent: Mrs Pamela Beedham
Limited. Connected to local employment.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 1120
Received: 24/08/2009
Respondent: Mr and Mrs T Robinson
Massive development on greenfield site. Harbury Lane has become a major traffic route around the south of Leamington to the Fosse Way. It is currently on the edge of development. Its route through a development would be disastrous. This would also destroy the character of Bishops Tachbrook as a village and community.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 1184
Received: 21/08/2009
Respondent: Barry Elliman
Object
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 1241
Received: 24/08/2009
Respondent: Andrew Horsley
Area of restraint. Inspector report relatively recent following an enquiry. Nothing has changed. Valuable agricultural land- strong opposition from local community. Insufficient local facilities - schools, shops, health. Roads choked already from Warwick Gates residents travelling into Whitnash to schools. Local children cannot get places at local schools. Already a recent concentrations of houses at Warwick Gates. Further building in this area would put additional pressure on a community that has been adveresly affected by this high density development.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 1282
Received: 26/08/2009
Respondent: Christopher Cox
I believe this will have a detrimental effect on the quality of life for Bishops Tachbrook and the surrounding area. There has been a considerable increase in road traffic since the completion of the Warwick Gates development and it is inevitable that further housing will cause traffic to overload the existing road system and cause gridlock. Other infrastucture in the area does not have the capacity to cater for the huge increase which your housing strategy will place on stretched resources.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 1285
Received: 26/08/2009
Respondent: Sharon Sanderson
I believe this will have a detrimental effect on the quality of life for Bishops Tachbrook and the surrounding area. There has been a considerable increase in road traffic since the completion of the Warwick Gates development and it is inevitable that further housing will cause traffic to overload the existing road system and cause gridlock. Other infrastucture in the area does not have the capacity to cater for the huge increase which your housing strategy will place on stretched resources.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 1299
Received: 31/07/2009
Respondent: AH and SM Cox
Number of people: 2
The extreme traffic congestion in this area does not allow for further pressure on the road system. Commuting anywhere particularly at peak times is already a major problem. Further traffic will only create more congestion and air pollution.
The present infrastructure cannot cope with the present situation i.e. health and school facilitiesm the waiting times and parking problems at Warwick Hospital are grossly overstretched.
We face onto a small woodland area which contains rare trees and lots of wildlife which should not be disturbed.