Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 41762
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: Ms Katrina Harris
We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 41764
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: Ms Katrina Harris
Woodside Farm was the subject of a Government Review some 2/3 years ago and the outcome was not to develop this land.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 41770
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: The Occupier
We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 41772
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: The Occupier
Woodside Farm was the subject of a Government Review some 2/3 years ago and the outcome was not to develop this land.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 41778
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: Mr & Mrs B Thorne
We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 41780
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: Mr & Mrs B Thorne
Woodside Farm was the subject of a Government Review some 2/3 years ago and the outcome was not to develop this land.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 41786
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: The Occupier
We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 41788
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: The Occupier
Woodside Farm was the subject of a Government Review some 2/3 years ago and the outcome was not to develop this land.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 41794
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: Harbhajan Singh Hothi
We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 41796
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: Harbhajan Singh Hothi
Woodside Farm was the subject of a Government Review some 2/3 years ago and the outcome was not to develop this land.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 41802
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: A Bench
We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 41804
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: A Bench
Woodside Farm was the subject of a Government Review some 2/3 years ago and the outcome was not to develop this land.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 41810
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: Mr & Mrs P Doughty
We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 41812
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: Mr & Mrs P Doughty
Woodside Farm was the subject of a Government Review some 2/3 years ago and the outcome was not to develop this land.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 41818
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: C A Knowles
We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 41820
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: C A Knowles
Woodside Farm was the subject of a Government Review some 2/3 years ago and the outcome was not to develop this land.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 41826
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: Mrs D A Stanton
We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 41828
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: Mrs D A Stanton
Woodside Farm was the subject of a Government Review some 2/3 years ago and the outcome was not to develop this land.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 41834
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: Mr& Mrs Sidhu
We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 41836
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: Mr& Mrs Sidhu
Woodside Farm was the subject of a Government Review some 2/3 years ago and the outcome was not to develop this land.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 41842
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: Mr & Mrs B J Young
We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 41844
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: Mr & Mrs B J Young
Woodside Farm was the subject of a Government Review some 2/3 years ago and the outcome was not to develop this land.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 41850
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: G King
We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 41852
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: G King
Woodside Farm was the subject of a Government Review some 2/3 years ago and the outcome was not to develop this land.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 41858
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: L A Letchford
We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 41860
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: L A Letchford
Woodside Farm was the subject of a Government Review some 2/3 years ago and the outcome was not to develop this land.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 41866
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: Mr & Mrs P M A Holdright
We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 41868
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: Mr & Mrs P M A Holdright
Woodside Farm was the subject of a Government Review some 2/3 years ago and the outcome was not to develop this land.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 41874
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: D Hayward
We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 41876
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: D Hayward
Woodside Farm was the subject of a Government Review some 2/3 years ago and the outcome was not to develop this land.