Object

Representation ID: 40802

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: The Occupier

We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.

Object

Representation ID: 40804

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: The Occupier

Woodside Farm was the subject of a Government Review some 2/3 years ago and the outcome was not to develop this land.

Object

Representation ID: 40810

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Mrs J E White

We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.

Object

Representation ID: 40812

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Mrs J E White

Woodside Farm was the subject of a Government Review some 2/3 years ago and the outcome was not to develop this land.

Object

Representation ID: 40818

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: A P Cleaver

We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.

Object

Representation ID: 40820

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: A P Cleaver

Woodside Farm was the subject of a Government Review some 2/3 years ago and the outcome was not to develop this land.

Object

Representation ID: 40826

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Mr & Mrs G Richards

We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.

Object

Representation ID: 40828

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Mr & Mrs G Richards

Woodside Farm was the subject of a Government Review some 2/3 years ago and the outcome was not to develop this land.

Object

Representation ID: 40834

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Mr & Mrs Pike

We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.

Object

Representation ID: 40836

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Mr & Mrs Pike

Woodside Farm was the subject of a Government Review some 2/3 years ago and the outcome was not to develop this land.

Object

Representation ID: 40842

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Mr & Mrs Deavall

We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.

Object

Representation ID: 40844

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Mr & Mrs Deavall

Woodside Farm was the subject of a Government Review some 2/3 years ago and the outcome was not to develop this land.

Object

Representation ID: 40850

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: The Occupier

We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.

Object

Representation ID: 40852

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: The Occupier

Woodside Farm was the subject of a Government Review some 2/3 years ago and the outcome was not to develop this land.

Object

Representation ID: 40858

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Mr & Mrs Barker

We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.

Object

Representation ID: 40860

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Mr & Mrs Barker

Woodside Farm was the subject of a Government Review some 2/3 years ago and the outcome was not to develop this land.

Object

Representation ID: 40866

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Ms Pam Smart

We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.

Object

Representation ID: 40868

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Ms Pam Smart

Woodside Farm was the subject of a Government Review some 2/3 years ago and the outcome was not to develop this land.

Object

Representation ID: 40874

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Mr & Mrs A G W Wickes

We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.

Object

Representation ID: 40876

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Mr & Mrs A G W Wickes

Woodside Farm was the subject of a Government Review some 2/3 years ago and the outcome was not to develop this land.

Object

Representation ID: 40882

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Ailsa Curtis

We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.

Object

Representation ID: 40884

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Ailsa Curtis

Woodside Farm was the subject of a Government Review some 2/3 years ago and the outcome was not to develop this land.

Object

Representation ID: 40890

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: The Occupier

We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.

Object

Representation ID: 40892

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: The Occupier

Woodside Farm was the subject of a Government Review some 2/3 years ago and the outcome was not to develop this land.

Object

Representation ID: 40898

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: B Gilfillan

We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.

Object

Representation ID: 40900

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: B Gilfillan

Woodside Farm was the subject of a Government Review some 2/3 years ago and the outcome was not to develop this land.

Object

Representation ID: 40906

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: E F Critchley

We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.

Object

Representation ID: 40908

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: E F Critchley

Woodside Farm was the subject of a Government Review some 2/3 years ago and the outcome was not to develop this land.

Object

Representation ID: 40914

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Ms Jean Bartram

We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.

Object

Representation ID: 40916

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Ms Jean Bartram

Woodside Farm was the subject of a Government Review some 2/3 years ago and the outcome was not to develop this land.