Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 39834
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: Mrs J Archer
We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 39836
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: Mrs J Archer
Woodside Farm was the subject of a Government Review some 2/3 years ago and the outcome was not to develop this land.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 39842
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: Mr Keith Allen
We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 39844
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: Mr Keith Allen
Woodside Farm was the subject of a Government Review some 2/3 years ago and the outcome was not to develop this land.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 39850
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: E Maycock
We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 39852
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: E Maycock
Woodside Farm was the subject of a Government Review some 2/3 years ago and the outcome was not to develop this land.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 39858
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: Mr M McSkarry
We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 39860
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: Mr M McSkarry
Woodside Farm was the subject of a Government Review some 2/3 years ago and the outcome was not to develop this land.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 39866
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: The Occupier
We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 39868
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: The Occupier
Woodside Farm was the subject of a Government Review some 2/3 years ago and the outcome was not to develop this land.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 39874
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: Mr & Mrs L Sweeney
We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 39876
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: Mr & Mrs L Sweeney
Woodside Farm was the subject of a Government Review some 2/3 years ago and the outcome was not to develop this land.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 39882
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: Jim Collen & Helen Burt
We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 39884
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: Jim Collen & Helen Burt
Woodside Farm was the subject of a Government Review some 2/3 years ago and the outcome was not to develop this land.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 39890
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: M Darly
We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 39892
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: M Darly
Woodside Farm was the subject of a Government Review some 2/3 years ago and the outcome was not to develop this land.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 39898
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: Mr & Mrs R Ward
We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 39900
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: Mr & Mrs R Ward
Woodside Farm was the subject of a Government Review some 2/3 years ago and the outcome was not to develop this land.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 39906
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: R W Jefkins
We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 39908
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: R W Jefkins
Woodside Farm was the subject of a Government Review some 2/3 years ago and the outcome was not to develop this land.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 39914
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: The Occupier
We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 39916
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: The Occupier
Woodside Farm was the subject of a Government Review some 2/3 years ago and the outcome was not to develop this land.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 39922
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: Mr Andrew Morrey
We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 39924
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: Mr Andrew Morrey
Woodside Farm was the subject of a Government Review some 2/3 years ago and the outcome was not to develop this land.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 39930
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: R Sutherland
We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 39932
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: R Sutherland
Woodside Farm was the subject of a Government Review some 2/3 years ago and the outcome was not to develop this land.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 39938
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: J N McWrath
We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 39940
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: J N McWrath
Woodside Farm was the subject of a Government Review some 2/3 years ago and the outcome was not to develop this land.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 39946
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: Mr & Mrs T E & R J Ramsay
We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 39948
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: Mr & Mrs T E & R J Ramsay
Woodside Farm was the subject of a Government Review some 2/3 years ago and the outcome was not to develop this land.