Showing comments and forms 61 to 90 of 106

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 3931

Received: 24/09/2009

Respondent: Andrea Telford

Representation Summary:

support

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 4033

Received: 24/09/2009

Respondent: Ms Angela Clarke

Representation Summary:

It just needs the money to get to the right people/places.

Comment

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 4038

Received: 24/09/2009

Respondent: Mrs Diana Sellwood

Representation Summary:

Involving the local community in any regeneration is crucial. I would not like to see that the need to do this delays action.

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 4363

Received: 22/09/2009

Respondent: A Picken

Representation Summary:

Support

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 4526

Received: 22/09/2009

Respondent: Southern Windy Arbour Area Residents' Association

Representation Summary:

support

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 4590

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Mr S Morris

Representation Summary:

support

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 4664

Received: 23/10/2009

Respondent: V Gill Peppitt

Representation Summary:

support

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 4862

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Vera Leeke

Representation Summary:

Object.

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 4902

Received: 07/10/2009

Respondent: Mr Graham Harrison

Representation Summary:

SUPPORT the concept of a framework, but with reservations in the absence of any further details.

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 5038

Received: 18/09/2009

Respondent: Michael Morris

Representation Summary:

Subject to my comments

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 5124

Received: 22/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Barry Betts

Representation Summary:

No green field development, only brown field or rejuvenation of existing areas.

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 5165

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Lindsay Wood

Representation Summary:

support

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 5198

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Sonia Owczarek

Representation Summary:

Object.

Comment

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 5281

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: J. N. Price

Representation Summary:

The expressed 'preferred option' is presented as the only option and seeks only to postpone any
decisions or action on the matter. I feel that the Coucil could have been more creative in it approach
to this issue.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 5335

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: SEAN DEELY

Representation Summary:

Significantly more definition needs to be given to developing a strategy to deal with deprived areas.

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 5386

Received: 24/09/2009

Respondent: John Baxter

Representation Summary:

Support.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 5435

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Mike Cheeseman

Representation Summary:

So where is the Strategic Policy?

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 5518

Received: 22/09/2009

Respondent: Mr and Mrs G Morgan

Number of people: 2

Representation Summary:

Support.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 5574

Received: 20/09/2009

Respondent: George Martin

Representation Summary:

Regeneration has to be linked to the regeneration of an area to be low carbon. Also specific incentives should be provided for the provision of 'green jobs' especially those linked to low carbon technology and services

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 5649

Received: 20/09/2009

Respondent: Jane Boynton

Representation Summary:

Support.

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 5695

Received: 22/09/2009

Respondent: Roger Warren

Representation Summary:

Support.

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 5758

Received: 24/09/2009

Respondent: Philip Wilson

Representation Summary:

BLAST will be monitoring the progress of this strategy for sooner rather than later action

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 5808

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Ms Alison Cox

Representation Summary:

Support.

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 5842

Received: 13/10/2009

Respondent: Pamela Payne

Representation Summary:

Support.

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 5910

Received: 28/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Alan Roberts

Representation Summary:

Support.

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 5989

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Debbie Harris

Representation Summary:

Support.

Comment

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 5990

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Debbie Harris

Representation Summary:

There is insufficient info on this option to form an opinion. It seems the Council is ignoring the need for regeneration.

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 6025

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Paul Skidmore

Representation Summary:

Support.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 6132

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Richard and Judy Swallow

Number of people: 2

Representation Summary:

One cannot support or object since the reason why it is a requirement, and the criteria for selection is not explained. In the latter case it is not sufficient for the Council to say that it prefers one option rather than another one.

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 6251

Received: 24/09/2009

Respondent: Ross Telford

Representation Summary:

Affordable housing is a priority.