Comment

Representation ID: 1934

Received: 03/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Andrew Ferguson

What preferred option!

Object

Representation ID: 2049

Received: 04/09/2009

Respondent: mr john jacques

insufficient consideration for views of local residents and businesses

Object

Representation ID: 2051

Received: 04/09/2009

Respondent: mr john jacques

not enough consideration to views of local people and businesses

Support

Representation ID: 2075

Received: 05/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Peter Kerr

Item 8.8 is supported

Support

Representation ID: 2167

Received: 07/09/2009

Respondent: Mr and Mrs Barrie and Margaret Hayles

Support.

Object

Representation ID: 2315

Received: 21/07/2009

Respondent: S B Hoyles

Object.

Support

Representation ID: 2361

Received: 07/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Greg Meadwell

I agree with the councils approach

Object

Representation ID: 2391

Received: 04/09/2009

Respondent: Roy Standley

No.

Object

Representation ID: 2430

Received: 08/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Connolly

Object.

Support

Representation ID: 2491

Received: 09/09/2009

Respondent: British Waterways

Support

Support

Representation ID: 2554

Received: 10/09/2009

Respondent: Mr R.A and Mrs B.E Donaldson

Number of people: 2

Agree that more detailed work is required.

Support

Representation ID: 2616

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: John Arnold

Support.

Comment

Representation ID: 2677

Received: 10/09/2009

Respondent: Mrs Margaret Devitt

Can't reply since you don't give any proposals. A united policy for schools, police, social services etc. Should be rigorously implemented after consultation with local people about what they feel they need.

Support

Representation ID: 2705

Received: 10/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Terence Kemp

Support

Support

Representation ID: 2739

Received: 09/09/2009

Respondent: Pauline Neale

Maintain centres that support those with social disadvantages e.g. Leamington's former library in Avenue Road as a meeting place/art gallery and creative cafes/events in old town.

Support

Representation ID: 2790

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: Mrs Sheila F. Hadfield

Support.

Object

Representation ID: 2831

Received: 11/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Robert Butcher

Object.

Object

Representation ID: 2870

Received: 11/09/2009

Respondent: Susan Butcher

Object.

Object

Representation ID: 2977

Received: 16/09/2009

Respondent: Mrs and Mr J Parr and Cotterill

Employment first and foremost.

Object

Representation ID: 3081

Received: 17/09/2000

Respondent: Mr Anthony Morris

I object strongly to the proposed development to the south of Harbury Lane in the Parish of Bishops Tachbrook.

Support

Representation ID: 3157

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: Mr R.C Hadfield

Support

Object

Representation ID: 3203

Received: 18/09/2009

Respondent: Robert Burtonshaw

No building on North Leamington Allotments

Support

Representation ID: 3223

Received: 20/09/2009

Respondent: mrs stella moore

regeneration of run down areas is vital

Object

Representation ID: 3265

Received: 20/09/2009

Respondent: Mr David John Bowers

Regeneration has not helped Birmingham, Coventry or the West Midlands.

Support

Representation ID: 3393

Received: 16/09/2009

Respondent: Mrs M Kane

Support

Object

Representation ID: 3515

Received: 21/09/2009

Respondent: David Wood

I do not know enough about this area to comment in detail, however I think the preferred option of "someone ought to do some work in this area" is not good enough.

Object

Representation ID: 3565

Received: 16/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Owen

object

Support

Representation ID: 3643

Received: 15/09/2000

Respondent: Mr Dennis Michael Crips

support

Object

Representation ID: 3697

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Richard Brookes

An oppportunity is being missed here to regenerate, provide a mixed "zero-commuting" development that reduces the pressure on green fields for housing.

Object

Representation ID: 3861

Received: 24/09/2009

Respondent: Debbie Wiggins

There is no preferred option for regeneration - make sure there is one soon. Create a strategy but astrategy without a realisation plan for the next five years is more waste of public money.