Showing comments and forms 91 to 115 of 115

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 6154

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Barry & Valerie Sankey

Number of people: 2

Representation Summary:

Kings Hill is too large and too close to the city to be its own community and is cut off from Coventry by overloaded road networks.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 6182

Received: 13/10/2009

Respondent: John, Elaine and Sarah Lewis

Representation Summary:

Object

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 6250

Received: 24/09/2009

Respondent: Ross Telford

Representation Summary:

Support

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 6308

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Mr and Mrs Cheatle

Representation Summary:

Object

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 6310

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Mr and Mrs Cheatle

Representation Summary:

Object

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 6332

Received: 18/09/2009

Respondent: John Jessamine

Representation Summary:

Object.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 6435

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: graham leeke

Representation Summary:

This is one of the weakest sections of the whole document. Lack of vision, ambition and energy. See comments on 6a.... and airport at Baginton needs regeneration too.

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 6686

Received: 22/09/2009

Respondent: Milverton New Allotments Association Ltd

Representation Summary:

support

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 6844

Received: 22/09/2009

Respondent: Kenilworth Chamber of Trade

Representation Summary:

Key is the ability to adapt to change over the plan period. KCOT would support he idea that the existing Common Lane Industrial Estate could be eventually surrendered to residential use but this is strictly predicated on the basis that at least 25 acres of employment land have been exclusively allocated and under development at an alternate site in town such as Thickthorn.

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 6863

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Binswood Allotment Society

Representation Summary:

support

Comment

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 6932

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Bishops Tachbrook Parish Council

Representation Summary:

Regeneration
The Parish Council believes that there has been insufficient focus on our deprived areas. The preferred option document seems to be saying that "we don‟t know what to do about it and really we are not particularly concerned". Development of community facilities, educational resources, starter business units, attractive locations and better housing mixes, including comprehensive redevelopment of poorly served areas could well be brought into the mix.

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 6973

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Kenilworth Chamber of Trade

Representation Summary:

Key is the ability to adapt to change over the plan period. KCOT would support the idea that the existing Common lane Industrial Estate could eventually be surrendered to residential use but this is strictly predicated on the basis that at least 25 acres of employment land have been exclusively allocated and under development at an alternate site in town such as Thickthorn.

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 6991

Received: 24/09/2009

Respondent: Norton Lindsey Parish Council

Representation Summary:

Supported

Comment

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 7054

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Warwick and Leamington Green Party

Representation Summary:

Regeneration strategy right to focus on Lillington, Brunswick and Kingsway in Leamington, Packmores and The Cape in Warwick.
Significant experience of successful regeneration work undertaken in Leamington Old Town; should build on findings; regeneration must include social, environmental and physical aspects as well as economic. Disappointing that the CS focuses development in north Leamington. Would be better for town centre development to concentrate on areas in need of regeneration such as the Court Street / Althorpe Street site and the Leamington Station / Ford Foundry site. Such developments should be mixed use.

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 7451

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Trilogy

Agent: Nathaniel Lichfield & Partners

Representation Summary:

Support. Helping deprived areas through regeneration is supported. The Core Strategy should recognise the role of retail employment in delivering regeneration benefits and contributing to the overall employment and economic activity in the District.

The redevelopment of the Ford Foundry and wider arc of opportunity to the south of the railway line points to maximising the value of regeneration. These have the potential to provide sustainable linkages so as to address relative deprivation in Brunswick and Kingsway wards.

We agree with setting out a strategic policy framework of helping disadvantaged areas with more detailed work being carried out locally.

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 7466

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Hatton Estate

Agent: RPS Planning

Representation Summary:

Support

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 7510

Received: 11/09/2009

Respondent: Government Office for the West Midlands

Representation Summary:

The strategy should have regard to the Warwickshire Sustainable Community Strategy and in particular its key issue of narrowing the gap between different neighbourhoods. Reference could be made to tageted geographic priorities for addressing deprivation in Brunswick, Crown and West Warwick and the key partners involved.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 7549

Received: 17/09/2009

Respondent: Mr George Jones

Representation Summary:

Object

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 7684

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Ray Bullen

Representation Summary:

The Preferred Options Paper fails to address the issue of what to do about deprived areas. It seems to be saying that "we don't know what to do about it and really we are not particularly concerned". Development of community facilities, educational resources, starter business units, attractive locations and better housing mixes, including comprehensive redevelopment of poorly served areas could well be brought into the mix.

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 33610

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Warwickshire County Council [Archaeological Information and Advice]

Agent: Savills (L&P) Ltd

Representation Summary:

Support

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 33706

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Midland & Regional and Travis Perkins

Agent: Signet Planning

Representation Summary:

Should reconsider deliverability of regeneration opportunity in the Station Area via promoting new large format food retailing as a pump primer to regeneration.

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 33757

Received: 28/08/2009

Respondent: Shirley Estates

Agent: Davis Planning Partnership

Representation Summary:

Support

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 33820

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Gallagher Estates

Representation Summary:

Support

Comment

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 33878

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: A C Lloyd

Agent: Redline

Representation Summary:

The Sydenham and Whitnash areas display serious indicators of declining services in both public and private facilities. The proposals put forward in respect of South Sydenham can redress a number of these deficiencies and act as a catalyst for regeneration.

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 33957

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Tesco Stores Ltd

Representation Summary:

four areas within the District (Lillington East, Brunswick south east, Brunswick south west and Kingsway) ranked in the top 30% most deprived areas nationally. the CS states that 'it is not the purpose of the CS to set out detailed policies and allocations required to improve those specific deprived areas. this would be more appropriately undertaken at the local level working with communities through the development of an area action plan or supplementary planing document for specific areas of the District'

Tesco support this preferred option