Showing comments and forms 61 to 90 of 115

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 3858

Received: 24/09/2009

Respondent: Debbie Wiggins

Representation Summary:

What a pity you did not decide to pursue this further. Many other authorities embrace regeneration as a means to produce fantastic urban sites with fabulous buildings, centres of social engagement and provide culture and community. You are deciding to side step your way - this is a sad reflection of your priorities which seem to be more and more aligned to the interests of the developers and not the community.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 3867

Received: 22/09/2009

Respondent: Patricia Diane Freeman

Representation Summary:

No I do not think that other options have not been t hought about. Why? That people did not respond to these ideas sooner?

Comment

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 3930

Received: 24/09/2009

Respondent: Andrea Telford

Representation Summary:

support

Comment

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 4032

Received: 24/09/2009

Respondent: Ms Angela Clarke

Representation Summary:

I expect they will continue to be worked on.

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 4035

Received: 24/09/2009

Respondent: Mrs Diana Sellwood

Representation Summary:

support all efforts to regenerated deprived areas

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 4362

Received: 22/09/2009

Respondent: A Picken

Representation Summary:

Support

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 4525

Received: 22/09/2009

Respondent: Southern Windy Arbour Area Residents' Association

Representation Summary:

support

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 4663

Received: 23/10/2009

Respondent: V Gill Peppitt

Representation Summary:

Support

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 4861

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Vera Leeke

Representation Summary:

This is one of the weakest sections of the document. Lack of vision, ambition and energy.

See comments in 6a. [WDC should take the initiative in setting up Development Agencies to regenerate Old Town and canal side areas. This development could include mixed employment (workshop) and housing. There is already too much retail space and unused sites could be developed.]

Airport land at Baginton needs regeneration too.

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 4898

Received: 07/10/2009

Respondent: Mr Graham Harrison

Representation Summary:

Support

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 5037

Received: 18/09/2009

Respondent: Michael Morris

Representation Summary:

Subject to my comments

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 5123

Received: 22/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Barry Betts

Representation Summary:

No green field development, only brown field or rejuvenation of existing areas.
Or you could be revolutionary and look after the existing population first before destroying the character of the town completely and make a stand against the plans of outside interests.

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 5164

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Lindsay Wood

Representation Summary:

support

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 5196

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Sonia Owczarek

Representation Summary:

Object.

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 5280

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: J. N. Price

Representation Summary:

Recognising that rural deprivation, although scattered and disparate, is prevalent in parts of the district, greater the Council needs to identify positive measure to relieve the specific problems. Again, this may be an area where the necessary actions will seem to be disproportionate to the efforts involved, though nevertheless essential.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 5334

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: SEAN DEELY

Representation Summary:

There has been insufficient focus is preparing this strategy, on our deprived areas.

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 5385

Received: 24/09/2009

Respondent: John Baxter

Representation Summary:

Support.

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 5434

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Mike Cheeseman

Representation Summary:

What I don't understand is why the Core Strategy is excused from touching on detailed policies for regeneration when it does this for other aspects. It would be useful to define (at least some of) the elements of regeneration. Without this it is a non-statement.

Comment

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 5473

Received: 27/09/2009

Respondent: Joanna Illingworth

Representation Summary:

There is nothing to agree or disagree with in the Preferred Option document.

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 5517

Received: 22/09/2009

Respondent: Mr and Mrs G Morgan

Number of people: 2

Representation Summary:

Support.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 5573

Received: 20/09/2009

Respondent: George Martin

Representation Summary:

Regeneration has to be linked to the regeneration of an area to be low carbon. Also specific incentives should be provided for the provision of 'green jobs' especially those linked to low carbon technology and services

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 5648

Received: 20/09/2009

Respondent: Jane Boynton

Representation Summary:

Support.

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 5694

Received: 22/09/2009

Respondent: Roger Warren

Representation Summary:

Support.

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 5757

Received: 24/09/2009

Respondent: Philip Wilson

Representation Summary:

Believe that regeneration of under used land that could be made into growing land could provide opportunities to grow food and be more self-supportive across the community - it could also help to reduce waiting lists of existing allotments

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 5841

Received: 13/10/2009

Respondent: Pamela Payne

Representation Summary:

Support.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 5885

Received: 05/10/2009

Respondent: Mr and Mrs C G Price

Representation Summary:

Leave well alone.

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 5909

Received: 28/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Alan Roberts

Representation Summary:

Support.

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 6024

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Paul Skidmore

Representation Summary:

Support.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 6066

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Stephen Skidmore

Representation Summary:

Surely there is Green Belt land in other areas to share the load of Coventry even though the use is disagreeable.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 6131

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Richard and Judy Swallow

Number of people: 2

Representation Summary:

No - if it is the case that the Government is entitled to require the Council to identify "options" (and that is not accepted) there is no indication of criteria used to determine what is "reasonable". The Council's proposals are to override the need for "planning approval" and that in itself is not reasonable.