Object

Representation ID: 35716

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: Ms L Sanins

Why was there no consideration of the creation of a new settlement (similar to Southam) - possibly near A46/J15 where there are direct links to road network. Why was there no consideration of the option to disperse growth across the District which was preferred by the public from the initial consulation?

Object

Representation ID: 35726

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: Mr and Mrs K Ireland

Why was there no consideration of the creation of a new settlement (similar to Southam) - possibly near A46/J15 where there are direct links to road network. Why was there no consideration of the option to disperse growth across the District which was preferred by the public from the initial consulation?

Object

Representation ID: 35736

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: D G Squire

Why was there no consideration of the creation of a new settlement (similar to Southam) - possibly near A46/J15 where there are direct links to road network. Why was there no consideration of the option to disperse growth across the District which was preferred by the public from the initial consulation?

Object

Representation ID: 35746

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: Adrian Farmer

Why was there no consideration of the creation of a new settlement (similar to Southam) - possibly near A46/J15 where there are direct links to road network. Why was there no consideration of the option to disperse growth across the District which was preferred by the public from the initial consulation?

Object

Representation ID: 35756

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: Mr D Gaught

Why was there no consideration of the creation of a new settlement (similar to Southam) - possibly near A46/J15 where there are direct links to road network. Why was there no consideration of the option to disperse growth across the District which was preferred by the public from the initial consulation?

Object

Representation ID: 35766

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: G M Webb

Why was there no consideration of the creation of a new settlement (similar to Southam) - possibly near A46/J15 where there are direct links to road network. Why was there no consideration of the option to disperse growth across the District which was preferred by the public from the initial consulation?

Object

Representation ID: 35776

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: Mary Smith

Why was there no consideration of the creation of a new settlement (similar to Southam) - possibly near A46/J15 where there are direct links to road network. Why was there no consideration of the option to disperse growth across the District which was preferred by the public from the initial consulation?

Object

Representation ID: 35786

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: Peter Gallagher

Why was there no consideration of the creation of a new settlement (similar to Southam) - possibly near A46/J15 where there are direct links to road network. Why was there no consideration of the option to disperse growth across the District which was preferred by the public from the initial consulation?

Object

Representation ID: 35796

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: A and M Cooly

Why was there no consideration of the creation of a new settlement (similar to Southam) - possibly near A46/J15 where there are direct links to road network. Why was there no consideration of the option to disperse growth across the District which was preferred by the public from the initial consulation?

Object

Representation ID: 35806

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: Jan Locke

Why was there no consideration of the creation of a new settlement (similar to Southam) - possibly near A46/J15 where there are direct links to road network. Why was there no consideration of the option to disperse growth across the District which was preferred by the public from the initial consulation?

Object

Representation ID: 35816

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: D R Ariss

Why was there no consideration of the creation of a new settlement (similar to Southam) - possibly near A46/J15 where there are direct links to road network. Why was there no consideration of the option to disperse growth across the District which was preferred by the public from the initial consulation?

Object

Representation ID: 35826

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: Joanne Ferguson

Why was there no consideration of the creation of a new settlement (similar to Southam) - possibly near A46/J15 where there are direct links to road network. Why was there no consideration of the option to disperse growth across the District which was preferred by the public from the initial consulation?

Object

Representation ID: 35836

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: Sue Penton

Why was there no consideration of the creation of a new settlement (similar to Southam) - possibly near A46/J15 where there are direct links to road network. Why was there no consideration of the option to disperse growth across the District which was preferred by the public from the initial consulation?

Object

Representation ID: 35846

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: A Taylor

Why was there no consideration of the creation of a new settlement (similar to Southam) - possibly near A46/J15 where there are direct links to road network. Why was there no consideration of the option to disperse growth across the District which was preferred by the public from the initial consulation?

Object

Representation ID: 35856

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: The Occupier

Why was there no consideration of the creation of a new settlement (similar to Southam) - possibly near A46/J15 where there are direct links to road network. Why was there no consideration of the option to disperse growth across the District which was preferred by the public from the initial consulation?

Object

Representation ID: 35866

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: Christopher and Lynne Gilbert-Davies

Why was there no consideration of the creation of a new settlement (similar to Southam) - possibly near A46/J15 where there are direct links to road network. Why was there no consideration of the option to disperse growth across the District which was preferred by the public from the initial consulation?

Object

Representation ID: 35876

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: Carolyn and David Blick

Why was there no consideration of the creation of a new settlement (similar to Southam) - possibly near A46/J15 where there are direct links to road network. Why was there no consideration of the option to disperse growth across the District which was preferred by the public from the initial consulation?

Object

Representation ID: 35886

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: Mr and Mrs Gill

Why was there no consideration of the creation of a new settlement (similar to Southam) - possibly near A46/J15 where there are direct links to road network. Why was there no consideration of the option to disperse growth across the District which was preferred by the public from the initial consulation?

Object

Representation ID: 35896

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: Mr and Mrs Price

Why was there no consideration of the creation of a new settlement (similar to Southam) - possibly near A46/J15 where there are direct links to road network. Why was there no consideration of the option to disperse growth across the District which was preferred by the public from the initial consulation?

Object

Representation ID: 35906

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: Miss E H Dunwoody

Why was there no consideration of the creation of a new settlement (similar to Southam) - possibly near A46/J15 where there are direct links to road network. Why was there no consideration of the option to disperse growth across the District which was preferred by the public from the initial consulation?

Object

Representation ID: 35916

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: J R Moore

Why was there no consideration of the creation of a new settlement (similar to Southam) - possibly near A46/J15 where there are direct links to road network. Why was there no consideration of the option to disperse growth across the District which was preferred by the public from the initial consulation?

Object

Representation ID: 35926

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: The Occupier

Why was there no consideration of the creation of a new settlement (similar to Southam) - possibly near A46/J15 where there are direct links to road network. Why was there no consideration of the option to disperse growth across the District which was preferred by the public from the initial consulation?

Object

Representation ID: 35936

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: The Occupier

Why was there no consideration of the creation of a new settlement (similar to Southam) - possibly near A46/J15 where there are direct links to road network. Why was there no consideration of the option to disperse growth across the District which was preferred by the public from the initial consulation?

Object

Representation ID: 35946

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: I Autwal

Why was there no consideration of the creation of a new settlement (similar to Southam) - possibly near A46/J15 where there are direct links to road network. Why was there no consideration of the option to disperse growth across the District which was preferred by the public from the initial consulation?

Object

Representation ID: 35956

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: Mr and Mrs D Fendley

Why was there no consideration of the creation of a new settlement (similar to Southam) - possibly near A46/J15 where there are direct links to road network. Why was there no consideration of the option to disperse growth across the District which was preferred by the public from the initial consulation?

Object

Representation ID: 35966

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: Mr M R Schofield

Why was there no consideration of the creation of a new settlement (similar to Southam) - possibly near A46/J15 where there are direct links to road network. Why was there no consideration of the option to disperse growth across the District which was preferred by the public from the initial consulation?

Object

Representation ID: 35976

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: Mrs S M Joseph

Why was there no consideration of the creation of a new settlement (similar to Southam) - possibly near A46/J15 where there are direct links to road network. Why was there no consideration of the option to disperse growth across the District which was preferred by the public from the initial consulation?

Object

Representation ID: 35986

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: Mr H J Aspinall

Why was there no consideration of the creation of a new settlement (similar to Southam) - possibly near A46/J15 where there are direct links to road network. Why was there no consideration of the option to disperse growth across the District which was preferred by the public from the initial consulation?

Object

Representation ID: 35996

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: Mrs Diane Martin and Mr J Marshall

Why was there no consideration of the creation of a new settlement (similar to Southam) - possibly near A46/J15 where there are direct links to road network. Why was there no consideration of the option to disperse growth across the District which was preferred by the public from the initial consulation?

Object

Representation ID: 36006

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: Steven Davison

Why was there no consideration of the creation of a new settlement (similar to Southam) - possibly near A46/J15 where there are direct links to road network. Why was there no consideration of the option to disperse growth across the District which was preferred by the public from the initial consulation?