Object

Representation ID: 33959

Received: 24/09/2009

Respondent: Louis Balestrini

Too much green belt is being used housing.more brown field land shpuld be used such as Coventry airport and the old Peugeot plant at Ryton.

Object

Representation ID: 33982

Received: 21/12/2009

Respondent: Heathcote Park Residents Association

We note that the option for a rural settlement was ruled out. We fail to see the difference between a rural settlement and the option to build 4200 houses and industrial units together on land on Harbury Lane and Europa Way; which will require a massive input of services, schools being just one requirement to sustain this development. Only 6% respondents supported high density development. This area was not in the most popular directions of growth.

Object

Representation ID: 35136

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: Mr and Mrs Barrie and Margaret Hayles

Why was there no consideration of the creation of a new settlement (similar to Southam) - possibly near A46/J15 where there are direct links to road network. Why was there no consideration of the option to disperse growth across the District which was preferred by the public from the initial consulation?

Object

Representation ID: 35146

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: Mr and Mrs Stickley

Why was there no consideration of the creation of a new settlement (similar to Southam) - possibly near A46/J15 where there are direct links to road network. Why was there no consideration of the option to disperse growth across the District which was preferred by the public from the initial consulation?

Object

Representation ID: 35156

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: J J Gregory

Why was there no consideration of the creation of a new settlement (similar to Southam) - possibly near A46/J15 where there are direct links to road network. Why was there no consideration of the option to disperse growth across the District which was preferred by the public from the initial consulation?

Object

Representation ID: 35166

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Terry Shepherd

Why was there no consideration of the creation of a new settlement (similar to Southam) - possibly near A46/J15 where there are direct links to road network. Why was there no consideration of the option to disperse growth across the District which was preferred by the public from the initial consulation?

Object

Representation ID: 35176

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: James Jack

Why was there no consideration of the creation of a new settlement (similar to Southam) - possibly near A46/J15 where there are direct links to road network. Why was there no consideration of the option to disperse growth across the District which was preferred by the public from the initial consulation?

Object

Representation ID: 35186

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: The Occupier

Why was there no consideration of the creation of a new settlement (similar to Southam) - possibly near A46/J15 where there are direct links to road network. Why was there no consideration of the option to disperse growth across the District which was preferred by the public from the initial consulation?

Object

Representation ID: 35196

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: Mrs D Thomas

Why was there no consideration of the creation of a new settlement (similar to Southam) - possibly near A46/J15 where there are direct links to road network. Why was there no consideration of the option to disperse growth across the District which was preferred by the public from the initial consulation?

Object

Representation ID: 35206

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: The Occupier

Why was there no consideration of the creation of a new settlement (similar to Southam) - possibly near A46/J15 where there are direct links to road network. Why was there no consideration of the option to disperse growth across the District which was preferred by the public from the initial consulation?

Object

Representation ID: 35216

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: The Occupier

Why was there no consideration of the creation of a new settlement (similar to Southam) - possibly near A46/J15 where there are direct links to road network. Why was there no consideration of the option to disperse growth across the District which was preferred by the public from the initial consulation?

Object

Representation ID: 35226

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: Mr and Mrs P Bridgewater

Why was there no consideration of the creation of a new settlement (similar to Southam) - possibly near A46/J15 where there are direct links to road network. Why was there no consideration of the option to disperse growth across the District which was preferred by the public from the initial consulation?

Object

Representation ID: 35236

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: Natasha Yurkwich-Ell

Why was there no consideration of the creation of a new settlement (similar to Southam) - possibly near A46/J15 where there are direct links to road network. Why was there no consideration of the option to disperse growth across the District which was preferred by the public from the initial consulation?

Object

Representation ID: 35246

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: Mrs J Bowen

Why was there no consideration of the creation of a new settlement (similar to Southam) - possibly near A46/J15 where there are direct links to road network. Why was there no consideration of the option to disperse growth across the District which was preferred by the public from the initial consulation?

Object

Representation ID: 35256

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: The Occupier

Why was there no consideration of the creation of a new settlement (similar to Southam) - possibly near A46/J15 where there are direct links to road network. Why was there no consideration of the option to disperse growth across the District which was preferred by the public from the initial consulation?

Object

Representation ID: 35266

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: Kate White

Why was there no consideration of the creation of a new settlement (similar to Southam) - possibly near A46/J15 where there are direct links to road network. Why was there no consideration of the option to disperse growth across the District which was preferred by the public from the initial consulation?

Object

Representation ID: 35276

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: Sachiyo Spreeuwenberg

Why was there no consideration of the creation of a new settlement (similar to Southam) - possibly near A46/J15 where there are direct links to road network. Why was there no consideration of the option to disperse growth across the District which was preferred by the public from the initial consulation?

Object

Representation ID: 35286

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: Timothy Jones

Why was there no consideration of the creation of a new settlement (similar to Southam) - possibly near A46/J15 where there are direct links to road network. Why was there no consideration of the option to disperse growth across the District which was preferred by the public from the initial consulation?

Object

Representation ID: 35296

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: S Saunders

Why was there no consideration of the creation of a new settlement (similar to Southam) - possibly near A46/J15 where there are direct links to road network. Why was there no consideration of the option to disperse growth across the District which was preferred by the public from the initial consulation?

Object

Representation ID: 35306

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: Anne Bryan

Why was there no consideration of the creation of a new settlement (similar to Southam) - possibly near A46/J15 where there are direct links to road network. Why was there no consideration of the option to disperse growth across the District which was preferred by the public from the initial consulation?

Object

Representation ID: 35316

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: A R Hall

Why was there no consideration of the creation of a new settlement (similar to Southam) - possibly near A46/J15 where there are direct links to road network. Why was there no consideration of the option to disperse growth across the District which was preferred by the public from the initial consulation?

Object

Representation ID: 35326

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: Sarah Hales

Why was there no consideration of the creation of a new settlement (similar to Southam) - possibly near A46/J15 where there are direct links to road network. Why was there no consideration of the option to disperse growth across the District which was preferred by the public from the initial consulation?

Object

Representation ID: 35336

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: Mrs L M Taylor

Why was there no consideration of the creation of a new settlement (similar to Southam) - possibly near A46/J15 where there are direct links to road network. Why was there no consideration of the option to disperse growth across the District which was preferred by the public from the initial consulation?

Object

Representation ID: 35346

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: W Lawrence

Why was there no consideration of the creation of a new settlement (similar to Southam) - possibly near A46/J15 where there are direct links to road network. Why was there no consideration of the option to disperse growth across the District which was preferred by the public from the initial consulation?

Object

Representation ID: 35356

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: F T Lorimer

Why was there no consideration of the creation of a new settlement (similar to Southam) - possibly near A46/J15 where there are direct links to road network. Why was there no consideration of the option to disperse growth across the District which was preferred by the public from the initial consulation?

Object

Representation ID: 35366

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: C J Martin

Why was there no consideration of the creation of a new settlement (similar to Southam) - possibly near A46/J15 where there are direct links to road network. Why was there no consideration of the option to disperse growth across the District which was preferred by the public from the initial consulation?

Object

Representation ID: 35376

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Bagga

Why was there no consideration of the creation of a new settlement (similar to Southam) - possibly near A46/J15 where there are direct links to road network. Why was there no consideration of the option to disperse growth across the District which was preferred by the public from the initial consulation?

Object

Representation ID: 35386

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: Mr & Mrs S and J Haigh

Why was there no consideration of the creation of a new settlement (similar to Southam) - possibly near A46/J15 where there are direct links to road network. Why was there no consideration of the option to disperse growth across the District which was preferred by the public from the initial consulation?

Object

Representation ID: 35396

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: Tim Crowley

Why was there no consideration of the creation of a new settlement (similar to Southam) - possibly near A46/J15 where there are direct links to road network. Why was there no consideration of the option to disperse growth across the District which was preferred by the public from the initial consulation?

Object

Representation ID: 35406

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: G M Hargreaves

Why was there no consideration of the creation of a new settlement (similar to Southam) - possibly near A46/J15 where there are direct links to road network. Why was there no consideration of the option to disperse growth across the District which was preferred by the public from the initial consulation?