7 Energy sources
Comment
Net Zero Carbon Development Plan Document - Regulation 19
Representation ID: 72169
Received: 08/05/2022
Respondent: BLAST (Bringing Leamington Allotment Societies Together)
What independent environmental sustainability bodies are monitoring the efficacy of proposals? I am concerned that the council does not have a realistic approach or the skills necessary to assess and implement the changes necessary. We are all stakeholders and transparency is crucial.
What independent environmental sustainability bodies are monitoring the efficacy of proposals? I am concerned that the council does not have a realistic approach or the skills necessary to assess and implement the changes necessary. We are all stakeholders and transparency is crucial.
Comment
Net Zero Carbon Development Plan Document - Regulation 19
Representation ID: 72195
Received: 08/06/2022
Respondent: Warwick District Labour Party
The potential 'feasibility' or 'viability' loophole should be removed or at least drastically redrafted to reflect NPPF policy and guidelines (para 2 of draft policy). These clearly indicate that lack of profitability on a scheme will primarily require adjustment to land purchase value not to the delivery of key Plan policies - of which this DPD will be a top priority for the foreseeable future. And that any issues of viability must be raised at or before a planning application is submitted.
Is gas ruled out by 7.3? Can it be made less ambiguous (see fuller comment in 4.1)
The potential 'feasibility' or 'viability' loophole should be removed or at least drastically redrafted to reflect NPPF policy and guidelines (para 2 of draft policy). These clearly indicate that lack of profitability on a scheme will primarily require adjustment to land purchase value not to the delivery of key Plan policies - of which this DPD will be a top priority for the foreseeable future. And that any issues of viability must be raised at or before a planning application is submitted.
Is gas ruled out by 7.3? Can it be made less ambiguous (see fuller comment in 4.1)