Community Safety and Policing

Comment

Representation ID: 71736

Received: 20/02/2020

Respondent: Barton Willmore (now Stantec)

Contributions towards community safety and policing should be in accordance with the tests applied by the CIL Reg. 122(2).

Support

Representation ID: 71761

Received: 15/01/2020

Respondent: Place Partnership Limited (PPL)

Community Safety and Policing – agreed that these contributions should be assessed on a case by case basis.

Welcomes / supports the Developer Contributions SPD

Object

Representation ID: 71764

Received: 15/01/2020

Respondent: Place Partnership Limited (PPL)

Community Safety and Policing – suggests that the following amendments are made to strengthen the text… ‘’The Council will therefore require development (where required and appropriate), to contribute towards the delivery of infrastructure to serve new developments and mitigate against their impact upon existing police resources.
This is because paragraphs 8, 26 and 92 of the NPPF (2019) together confirm that sustainable development means securing a safe environment through the delivery of social infrastructure needed by communities. In this respect paragraphs 20 and 95 together state policies should deliver development that makes sufficient provision for security infrastructure through using the most up to date information available from the police. This is reflected in Local Plan Policy DM1 – Infrastructure contributions. …., Accordingly contributions may include the following……
This brings development other than residential into consideration (those associated with the night time economy for example).

Object

Representation ID: 71785

Received: 21/02/2020

Respondent: Barton Willmore

Contributions towards community safety and policing should be in accordance with the tests applied by the CIL Reg. 122(2).