Policy CS9
Comment
Canalside Draft DPD
Representation ID: 71510
Received: 25/11/2019
Respondent: Ms Kristie Naimo
I realise these 3 policies are for 3 separate sites and the details must be nuanced, I wonder why there are inconsistencies between them in terms of policies around residential developments:
- CS9 asks for '100% low cost housing', whilst CS10 has only a '40% affordable' and no reference to a percentage at all in CS11
- CS9 appears to make an assumption that housing is inevitable and does not acknowledge the (potential) ongoing demand for industrial use as in CS10
I realise these 3 policies are for 3 separate sites and the details must be nuanced, I wonder why there are inconsistencies between them in terms of policies around residential developments:
- CS9 asks for '100% low cost housing', whilst CS10 has only a '40% affordable' and no reference to a percentage at all in CS11
- CS9 appears to make an assumption that housing is inevitable and does not acknowledge the (potential) ongoing demand for industrial use as in CS10