Policy CS9

Showing comments and forms 1 to 1 of 1

Comment

Canalside Draft DPD

Representation ID: 71510

Received: 25/11/2019

Respondent: Ms Kristie Naimo

Representation Summary:

I realise these 3 policies are for 3 separate sites and the details must be nuanced, I wonder why there are inconsistencies between them in terms of policies around residential developments:
- CS9 asks for '100% low cost housing', whilst CS10 has only a '40% affordable' and no reference to a percentage at all in CS11
- CS9 appears to make an assumption that housing is inevitable and does not acknowledge the (potential) ongoing demand for industrial use as in CS10

Full text:

I realise these 3 policies are for 3 separate sites and the details must be nuanced, I wonder why there are inconsistencies between them in terms of policies around residential developments:
- CS9 asks for '100% low cost housing', whilst CS10 has only a '40% affordable' and no reference to a percentage at all in CS11
- CS9 appears to make an assumption that housing is inevitable and does not acknowledge the (potential) ongoing demand for industrial use as in CS10