MM66
Object
Local Plan Main Modifications 2017
Representation ID: 70435
Received: 01/05/2017
Respondent: Ms Katherine Taylor
It is unclear who is responsible for the 'ecological assessment' that will be necessary on King's Hill if permission is given to build on Green Belt land.
It is unclear who is responsible for the 'ecological assessment' that will be necessary on King's Hill if permission is given to build on Green Belt land.
Object
Local Plan Main Modifications 2017
Representation ID: 70446
Received: 02/05/2017
Respondent: Mr Stuart Morrison
It is unclear in this main modification Ref NE2, who should carry out the ecological assessment that will be necessary for Kings Hill should permission be given to build on this Green Belt Land.
Also it is not clear what the success and failure criteria is for this assessment and would it be truly independent of WDC.
It is unclear in this main modification Ref NE2, who should carry out the ecological assessment that will be necessary for Kings Hill should permission be given to build on this Green Belt Land.
Also it is not clear what the success and failure criteria is for this assessment and would it be truly independent of WDC.
Object
Local Plan Main Modifications 2017
Representation ID: 70459
Received: 02/05/2017
Respondent: Lynn Morrison
It is unclear in this main modification Ref NE2, who should carry out the ecological assessment that will be necessary for Kings Hill should permission be given to build on this Green Belt Land.
Also it is not clear what the success and failure criteria is for this assessment and would it be truly independent of WDC.
It is unclear in this main modification Ref NE2, who should carry out the ecological assessment that will be necessary for Kings Hill should permission be given to build on this Green Belt Land.
Also it is not clear what the success and failure criteria is for this assessment and would it be truly independent of WDC.