MM16
Object
Local Plan Main Modifications 2017
Representation ID: 70485
Received: 03/05/2017
Respondent: Cryfield Land (Kenilworth) Ltd
Agent: Mr Niall Crabb
The Council has committed to a partial review of the area south of Coventry area within five years of adoption to consider whether additional housing is needed and the availability of infrastructure to deliver it.
This principle is further reinforced (and supported) by
2.83 Policy DS NEW1 which indicates that a partial review of the Local Plan will be undertaken within five years of the adoption of the plan, to address specific circumstances in the area to the south of Coventry.
The likelihood of an early Review is supported but as written, the Plan may be unsound.
The Council has committed to a partial review of the area south of Coventry area within five years of adoption to consider whether additional housing is needed and the availability of infrastructure to deliver it.
This principle is further reinforced (and supported) by
2.83 Policy DS NEW1 which indicates that a partial review of the Local Plan will be undertaken within five years of the adoption of the plan, to address specific circumstances in the area to the south of Coventry.
The likelihood of an early Review is supported but as written, the Plan may be unsound.
Object
Local Plan Main Modifications 2017
Representation ID: 70541
Received: 05/05/2017
Respondent: Stoneleigh & Ashow Parish Council
This plan is already out of date and is being driven through without taking time to reflect the most current data available. This narrative introduces a degree of uncertainty about future demand and agreements between authorities. Due consideration is not even being given to current known circumstances such as Coventry now being part of West Midlands Combined Authority.
This is creating an unacceptably open ended situation giving unfettered scope for future alterations and is unsound.
The MoU is based on out of date information and is therefore unsound
This plan is already out of date and is being driven through without taking time to reflect the most current data available. This narrative introduces a degree of uncertainty about future demand and agreements between authorities. Due consideration is not even being given to current known circumstances such as Coventry now being part of West Midlands Combined Authority.
This is creating an unacceptably open ended situation giving unfettered scope for future alterations and is unsound.
The MoU is based on out of date information and is therefore unsound