MM15

Object

Representation ID: 70344

Received: 13/04/2017

Respondent: malcolm tattum

H43 King's Hill, proposal to remove Green Belt status. Local Plan proposal remains unsound, NPPF states "exceptional circumstances" are required to facilitate development of green belt land. Other options remain available which are not being pursued due to political or expediency issues. WDC have singularly failed to make a case to remove H43 from Green Belt

Object

Representation ID: 70462

Received: 02/05/2017

Respondent: Dr Paul and Alison Sutcliffe

We have still not seen a response (which applies rigorous analysis) to previous objections related to the removal of the green belt at H28 - Hatton. We are increasingly concerned about the impact this will have on wildlife. In particular, the impact this would have on wildlife residing in and/or dependent on the hedge row separating the two fields (H28).

Object

Representation ID: 70481

Received: 03/05/2017

Respondent: Cryfield Land (Kenilworth) Ltd

Agent: Mr Niall Crabb

We suggest that this Modification should be further amended so that the list of land in 2.81 includes.....
* land South of Gibbet Hill Road/North of Cryfield Lane

Object

Representation ID: 70527

Received: 05/05/2017

Respondent: mrs Sheelpa Koria

More brown belt sights must be used to preserve the ecology of the area.

Object

Representation ID: 70540

Received: 05/05/2017

Respondent: Stoneleigh & Ashow Parish Council

Removing Kings hill from the greenbelt is based on unsound figures . No special circumstances have been demonstrated