MM7

Showing comments and forms 1 to 4 of 4

Object

Local Plan Main Modifications 2017

Representation ID: 70441

Received: 02/05/2017

Respondent: Mr Stuart Morrison

Representation Summary:

Housing figures in this main modification state :-
Greenfield sites on the edge of Coventry -2245
Greenfield sites on the edge of Kenilworth - 1593
Is this referring to Kings Hill as the total adds up to 3838 whereas the Kings Hill housing is stated as 4500.

Full text:

Housing figures in this main modification state :-
Greenfield sites on the edge of Coventry -2245
Greenfield sites on the edge of Kenilworth - 1593
Is this referring to Kings Hill as the total adds up to 3838 whereas the Kings Hill housing is stated as 4500.

Object

Local Plan Main Modifications 2017

Representation ID: 70453

Received: 02/05/2017

Respondent: Lynn Morrison

Representation Summary:

Housing figures in this main modification state :-
Greenfield sites on the edge of Coventry -2245
Greenfield sites on the edge of Kenilworth - 1593
Is this referring to Kings Hill as the total adds up to 3838 whereas the Kings Hill housing is stated as 4500.

Full text:

Housing figures in this main modification state :-
Greenfield sites on the edge of Coventry -2245
Greenfield sites on the edge of Kenilworth - 1593
Is this referring to Kings Hill as the total adds up to 3838 whereas the Kings Hill housing is stated as 4500.

Object

Local Plan Main Modifications 2017

Representation ID: 70477

Received: 03/05/2017

Respondent: Cryfield Land (Kenilworth) Ltd

Agent: Mr Niall Crabb

Representation Summary:

Whilst it is supported that "Greenfield sites on the edge of Coventry" are necessary to meet the housing need, in order to produce a "sound" plan, greater provision on such land would be preferable to other Greenfield sites proposed on the edge of other towns.

This being for a combination of reasons relating to sustainability, existence of existing services, close to centres of employment, close to Warwick University and, that large areas of land are already identified for possible development between Coventry and the HS2 line and specifically referred to in MM17 Policy DSNEW 1.

Full text:

Whilst it is supported that "Greenfield sites on the edge of Coventry" are necessary to meet the housing need, in order to produce a "sound" plan, greater provision on such land would be preferable to other Greenfield sites proposed on the edge of other towns.

This being for a combination of reasons relating to sustainability, existence of existing services, close to centres of employment, close to Warwick University and, that large areas of land are already identified for possible development between Coventry and the HS2 line and specifically referred to in MM17 Policy DSNEW 1.

Object

Local Plan Main Modifications 2017

Representation ID: 70536

Received: 05/05/2017

Respondent: Stoneleigh & Ashow Parish Council

Representation Summary:

This proposes to allocate green field sites on the edge of Coventry and is unsound as this is not consistent with Coventry City Councils own policy for locating greenfield sites

Full text:

This proposes to allocate green field sites on the edge of Coventry and is unsound as this is not consistent with Coventry City Councils own policy for locating greenfield sites