MM7
Object
Local Plan Main Modifications 2017
Representation ID: 70441
Received: 02/05/2017
Respondent: Mr Stuart Morrison
Housing figures in this main modification state :-
Greenfield sites on the edge of Coventry -2245
Greenfield sites on the edge of Kenilworth - 1593
Is this referring to Kings Hill as the total adds up to 3838 whereas the Kings Hill housing is stated as 4500.
Housing figures in this main modification state :-
Greenfield sites on the edge of Coventry -2245
Greenfield sites on the edge of Kenilworth - 1593
Is this referring to Kings Hill as the total adds up to 3838 whereas the Kings Hill housing is stated as 4500.
Object
Local Plan Main Modifications 2017
Representation ID: 70453
Received: 02/05/2017
Respondent: Lynn Morrison
Housing figures in this main modification state :-
Greenfield sites on the edge of Coventry -2245
Greenfield sites on the edge of Kenilworth - 1593
Is this referring to Kings Hill as the total adds up to 3838 whereas the Kings Hill housing is stated as 4500.
Housing figures in this main modification state :-
Greenfield sites on the edge of Coventry -2245
Greenfield sites on the edge of Kenilworth - 1593
Is this referring to Kings Hill as the total adds up to 3838 whereas the Kings Hill housing is stated as 4500.
Object
Local Plan Main Modifications 2017
Representation ID: 70477
Received: 03/05/2017
Respondent: Cryfield Land (Kenilworth) Ltd
Agent: Mr Niall Crabb
Whilst it is supported that "Greenfield sites on the edge of Coventry" are necessary to meet the housing need, in order to produce a "sound" plan, greater provision on such land would be preferable to other Greenfield sites proposed on the edge of other towns.
This being for a combination of reasons relating to sustainability, existence of existing services, close to centres of employment, close to Warwick University and, that large areas of land are already identified for possible development between Coventry and the HS2 line and specifically referred to in MM17 Policy DSNEW 1.
Whilst it is supported that "Greenfield sites on the edge of Coventry" are necessary to meet the housing need, in order to produce a "sound" plan, greater provision on such land would be preferable to other Greenfield sites proposed on the edge of other towns.
This being for a combination of reasons relating to sustainability, existence of existing services, close to centres of employment, close to Warwick University and, that large areas of land are already identified for possible development between Coventry and the HS2 line and specifically referred to in MM17 Policy DSNEW 1.
Object
Local Plan Main Modifications 2017
Representation ID: 70536
Received: 05/05/2017
Respondent: Stoneleigh & Ashow Parish Council
This proposes to allocate green field sites on the edge of Coventry and is unsound as this is not consistent with Coventry City Councils own policy for locating greenfield sites
This proposes to allocate green field sites on the edge of Coventry and is unsound as this is not consistent with Coventry City Councils own policy for locating greenfield sites