19. Sherbourne
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 64917
Received: 17/06/2014
Respondent: Barford, Sherbourne and Wasperton Joint Parish Council
Legally compliant? Yes
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Yes
The Limited Infill Villages boundary for Sherbourne currently includes part of an agricultural field and an agricultural barn. We do not consider that this should be included as land potentially suitable for development under the LIV policy.
The Limited Infill Villages boundary for Sherbourne currently includes part of an agricultural field and an agricultural barn. We do not consider that this should be included as land potentially suitable for development under the LIV policy.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 65730
Received: 27/06/2014
Respondent: Mr Tony Reece
Legally compliant? No
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Errors in Green Belt and infill village boundary.
Green Belt: southern edge is old A46 roadway
Infill boundary: should be along Vicarage Lane excluding dutch barn and agricultural land
Allotment gardens: were incorporated into agricultural field 15 - 20 years ago
see attached
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 65735
Received: 25/06/2014
Respondent: Ms Helen Whiter
Legally compliant? No
Sound? Not specified
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Mistake on the map showing the infill boundary in the wrong position. The line at Vicarage Lane opposite Sherbourne Court should be along the road and not set back in the field behind the barn.
Statement about Conservation Area makes clear importance of field and views. Entirely inappropriate for this to appear potential infill
see attached
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 66254
Received: 19/06/2014
Respondent: Antoinette Gordon
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
a) The village infill boundary includes a building adjacent Vicarage Lane which is an old corrugated iron clad barn. The filed is agricultural in character as is an important part of the character of the village and conservation area. The two small spinneys at opposite corners of this field are also important to the local landscape and should also sit outside the village boundary.
b) The allotments shown at the most northerly limit of the village no longer exist and have been ploughed back in to agricultural use. This should also be excluded fro the village boundary
c) the green belt boundary is shown incorrectly
See attached