6. Burton Green

Object

Representation ID: 65501

Received: 27/06/2014

Respondent: Sarah Palmer

Agent: Davies and Co

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Yes

In line with our representations in relation to other policies in the plan (DS10; DS11; DS19), the Burton Green Policy Map is objected to, in that land at Red Lane (as described more fully in those other representations) remains in the Green Belt (under Policy DS19) and is not an allocated housing site (under Policy DS11).

Object

Representation ID: 65634

Received: 25/06/2014

Respondent: Mr Mark Gordon

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Yes

Currently we have the bizarre situation that Burton Green Farm is in the village envelope, whereas, the farm on the opposite side of the road (Long Meadow Farm) is not. My proposal will rectify this anomaly.

I am pleased to see that you have accepted my proposal to include the school within the village envelope as it was previously excluded and trust that you will adopt my proposal above.

Object

Representation ID: 65893

Received: 26/06/2014

Respondent: Mrs Valerie Fisher

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

The gardens of nos 30,32,34 and 36 Hodgetts Lane should be included in the village envelope boundary and

Object

Representation ID: 65931

Received: 27/06/2014

Respondent: Mr Peter Stanworth

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Buildings at Long Meadow Farm have not been included within the Growth Village Envelope Boundary; the adjacent school, housing on Hob Lane and farm buildings opposite have.
Long Meadow Farm is no longer a working farm - now a domestic dwelling. Considered to be part of community with village functions held in grounds.
Also redundant water tower in same ownership which is excluded. Officers give no reason for exclusion, so cannot find justification.