6. Burton Green
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 65501
Received: 27/06/2014
Respondent: Sarah Palmer
Agent: Davies and Co
Legally compliant? Yes
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Yes
In line with our representations in relation to other policies in the plan (DS10; DS11; DS19), the Burton Green Policy Map is objected to, in that land at Red Lane (as described more fully in those other representations) remains in the Green Belt (under Policy DS19) and is not an allocated housing site (under Policy DS11).
In line with our representations in relation to other policies in the plan (DS10; DS11; DS19), the Burton Green Policy Map is objected to, in that land at Red Lane (as described more fully in those other representations) remains in the Green Belt (under Policy DS19) and is not an allocated housing site (under Policy DS11).
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 65634
Received: 25/06/2014
Respondent: Mr Mark Gordon
Legally compliant? Yes
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Yes
Currently we have the bizarre situation that Burton Green Farm is in the village envelope, whereas, the farm on the opposite side of the road (Long Meadow Farm) is not. My proposal will rectify this anomaly.
I am pleased to see that you have accepted my proposal to include the school within the village envelope as it was previously excluded and trust that you will adopt my proposal above.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 65893
Received: 26/06/2014
Respondent: Mrs Valerie Fisher
Legally compliant? No
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? No
The gardens of nos 30,32,34 and 36 Hodgetts Lane should be included in the village envelope boundary and
see attached
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 65931
Received: 27/06/2014
Respondent: Mr Peter Stanworth
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Buildings at Long Meadow Farm have not been included within the Growth Village Envelope Boundary; the adjacent school, housing on Hob Lane and farm buildings opposite have.
Long Meadow Farm is no longer a working farm - now a domestic dwelling. Considered to be part of community with village functions held in grounds.
Also redundant water tower in same ownership which is excluded. Officers give no reason for exclusion, so cannot find justification.
see attached