Norton Lindsey
Object
Preferred Options
Representation ID: 51454
Received: 27/07/2012
Respondent: Mr Roland Crisp
The proposed level of development is entirely inappropriate and of such a scale (25% increase at 30 homes and 65% increase at 80 homes) that it would cause irreparable harm to the village. It is also disproportionate to the scale and massing of the village and the approach needs to be reconsidered.
Norton Lindsey is uniquely located on the border with SDC and WDC - there are concerns that should SDC decide in their local plan to build up to the Norton Lindsey boundary and WDC wishes to place up to 80 new properties within Norton Lindsey, the cumulative effect would completely decimate the village.
There is a need for an inspector to consider the plans for WDC and SDC together and to take Norton Lindsey out of the immediate process to allow thw above to happen.
There is a statutory requirement for evidence of local housing need to be identified prior to any development being undertaken - the last local housing need survey indicated a need for 3 dwellings in Norton Lindsey - the quota of between 30-80 dwellings would appear to be far and above the local housing need. Norton Lindsey has also benefited from a number of affordable homes schemes over the years and is now well served by affordable housing of various tenures and sizes.
Norton Lindsey does not fulfil the transport criteria to mimimise the need to travel or access to sustainable forms of transport:
- There is no regular public transport
- Main Street is very narrow with many houses abutting the road and a number having accommodation at lower than street level / additional traffic may damage buildings
- The road structures along and leading from the village have bad bends, very narrow sections and no passing places - serious accidents have taken place.
- Norton Lindsey is too remote for walking to destinations such as Warwick and Leamington Spa and due to the road infrastructure cycling is dangerous.
- Parking is a problem with new residential schemes providing insufficient on-site parking causing congestion and safety hazards (30 dwellings could provide an additional 60 vehicles and 80 a minimum of 120 vehicles).
There is no employment in Norton Lindsey to support development. Further the addition of housing will not create any employment. Accordingly development on the scale envisaged runs counter to many of the aspirations as set out in both the Preferred Options document but also the NPPF.
The historic built environment restricts options to improve roads, which would also fundamentally ruin the context and integrity of the buildings.
Development may impact on the conservation areas and the overall historic environment. It is essential need to protect Norton Lindsey' unique heritage for current and future generations and avoid impacting on views and features
Due to environmental considerations and build standards to minimise carbon emissions together with affordable housing contributions, this may mean that such locations as Norton Lindsey are economically unviable to be brought forward for development. Also reference to earlier comments about promoting unsustainable transport.
Agree with the principle of inclusive, safe and healthy communities, but Norton Lindsey is an unsuitable site as it is not within a wide range of facilities.
Standard Response Representation Attached. Text copied below:
Norton Lindsey Village response to Warwick District Council consultation May 2012
New Local Plan Preferred Options
Sheet 1 of 1
Which document are you responding to? Preferred Options (Full Version)
Which part of the document are you responding to? Preferred Option 1 (P01)
Paragraph number I Heading I Subheading (if relevant) - 5.6, 5.10, 5.12, 5.13, 5.15, 5.18,5.22
What is the nature of your representation? OBJECT
Part 1 -Setting the Scene and Summary
P01 - Preferred Level of Growth
OBJECT
It is agreed that some growth will be required during the 2014-2029 period to sustain an
economic and vibrant economy. An increase in homes of appropriate tenures will be
required but the level of growth based on the economic predictions certainly over the
next five years seems excessive especially when viewed against the economic
backdrop. This comment is supported by Office of National Statistics data which reveals
that the rate of increase of Gross Domestic Product has been falling since mid 2010 and
has yet to show signs of recovery. On this basis growth has been downgraded to 0.7%
from 0.8%. Predictions from the respected International Monetary Fund have revised
expectations of growth of 0.8% down to 0.2% with a very modest almost "flat
lining"growth of 0.6% in 2013. Accordingly the base figures being utilised are over
stated.
We believe that the demand for further housing in Norton Lindsey is limited and can be
adequately met by windfall sites and as has been historically the case utilising previously
used land and buildings.
Changes to Preferred Option 1 -adopt a more conservative growth pattern to
reflect market conditions which are likely to prevail over the first half of the Plan
period.
Definitions:
NPPF-National Planning Policy Framework: WOe-Warwick District Council: SOC-Stratford upon Avon District Council
Agent's contact details:
Object
Preferred Options
Representation ID: 51464
Received: 27/07/2012
Respondent: D W Rogers
The proposed level of development is entirely inappropriate and of such a scale (25% increase at 30 homes and 65% increase at 80 homes) that it would cause irreparable harm to the village. It is also disproportionate to the scale and massing of the village and the approach needs to be reconsidered.
Norton Lindsey is uniquely located on the border with SDC and WDC - there are concerns that should SDC decide in their local plan to build up to the Norton Lindsey boundary and WDC wishes to place up to 80 new properties within Norton Lindsey, the cumulative effect would completely decimate the village.
There is a need for an inspector to consider the plans for WDC and SDC together and to take Norton Lindsey out of the immediate process to allow thw above to happen.
There is a statutory requirement for evidence of local housing need to be identified prior to any development being undertaken - the last local housing need survey indicated a need for 3 dwellings in Norton Lindsey - the quota of between 30-80 dwellings would appear to be far and above the local housing need. Norton Lindsey has also benefited from a number of affordable homes schemes over the years and is now well served by affordable housing of various tenures and sizes.
Norton Lindsey does not fulfil the transport criteria to mimimise the need to travel or access to sustainable forms of transport:
- There is no regular public transport
- Main Street is very narrow with many houses abutting the road and a number having accommodation at lower than street level / additional traffic may damage buildings
- The road structures along and leading from the village have bad bends, very narrow sections and no passing places - serious accidents have taken place.
- Norton Lindsey is too remote for walking to destinations such as Warwick and Leamington Spa and due to the road infrastructure cycling is dangerous.
- Parking is a problem with new residential schemes providing insufficient on-site parking causing congestion and safety hazards (30 dwellings could provide an additional 60 vehicles and 80 a minimum of 120 vehicles).
There is no employment in Norton Lindsey to support development. Further the addition of housing will not create any employment. Accordingly development on the scale envisaged runs counter to many of the aspirations as set out in both the Preferred Options document but also the NPPF.
The historic built environment restricts options to improve roads, which would also fundamentally ruin the context and integrity of the buildings.
Development may impact on the conservation areas and the overall historic environment. It is essential need to protect Norton Lindsey' unique heritage for current and future generations and avoid impacting on views and features
Due to environmental considerations and build standards to minimise carbon emissions together with affordable housing contributions, this may mean that such locations as Norton Lindsey are economically unviable to be brought forward for development. Also reference to earlier comments about promoting unsustainable transport.
Agree with the principle of inclusive, safe and healthy communities, but Norton Lindsey is an unsuitable site as it is not within a wide range of facilities.
Standard Response Representation Attached. Text copied below:
Norton Lindsey Village response to Warwick District Council consultation May 2012
New Local Plan Preferred Options
Sheet 1 of 1
Which document are you responding to? Preferred Options (Full Version)
Which part of the document are you responding to? Preferred Option 1 (P01)
Paragraph number I Heading I Subheading (if relevant) - 5.6, 5.10, 5.12, 5.13, 5.15, 5.18,5.22
What is the nature of your representation? OBJECT
Part 1 -Setting the Scene and Summary
P01 - Preferred Level of Growth
OBJECT
It is agreed that some growth will be required during the 2014-2029 period to sustain an
economic and vibrant economy. An increase in homes of appropriate tenures will be
required but the level of growth based on the economic predictions certainly over the
next five years seems excessive especially when viewed against the economic
backdrop. This comment is supported by Office of National Statistics data which reveals
that the rate of increase of Gross Domestic Product has been falling since mid 2010 and
has yet to show signs of recovery. On this basis growth has been downgraded to 0.7%
from 0.8%. Predictions from the respected International Monetary Fund have revised
expectations of growth of 0.8% down to 0.2% with a very modest almost "flat
lining"growth of 0.6% in 2013. Accordingly the base figures being utilised are over
stated.
We believe that the demand for further housing in Norton Lindsey is limited and can be
adequately met by windfall sites and as has been historically the case utilising previously
used land and buildings.
Changes to Preferred Option 1 -adopt a more conservative growth pattern to
reflect market conditions which are likely to prevail over the first half of the Plan
period.
Definitions:
NPPF-National Planning Policy Framework: WOe-Warwick District Council: SOC-Stratford upon Avon District Council
Agent's contact details:
Object
Preferred Options
Representation ID: 51474
Received: 27/07/2012
Respondent: mr tim landreth
The proposed level of development is entirely inappropriate and of such a scale (25% increase at 30 homes and 65% increase at 80 homes) that it would cause irreparable harm to the village. It is also disproportionate to the scale and massing of the village and the approach needs to be reconsidered.
Norton Lindsey is uniquely located on the border with SDC and WDC - there are concerns that should SDC decide in their local plan to build up to the Norton Lindsey boundary and WDC wishes to place up to 80 new properties within Norton Lindsey, the cumulative effect would completely decimate the village.
There is a need for an inspector to consider the plans for WDC and SDC together and to take Norton Lindsey out of the immediate process to allow thw above to happen.
There is a statutory requirement for evidence of local housing need to be identified prior to any development being undertaken - the last local housing need survey indicated a need for 3 dwellings in Norton Lindsey - the quota of between 30-80 dwellings would appear to be far and above the local housing need. Norton Lindsey has also benefited from a number of affordable homes schemes over the years and is now well served by affordable housing of various tenures and sizes.
Norton Lindsey does not fulfil the transport criteria to mimimise the need to travel or access to sustainable forms of transport:
- There is no regular public transport
- Main Street is very narrow with many houses abutting the road and a number having accommodation at lower than street level / additional traffic may damage buildings
- The road structures along and leading from the village have bad bends, very narrow sections and no passing places - serious accidents have taken place.
- Norton Lindsey is too remote for walking to destinations such as Warwick and Leamington Spa and due to the road infrastructure cycling is dangerous.
- Parking is a problem with new residential schemes providing insufficient on-site parking causing congestion and safety hazards (30 dwellings could provide an additional 60 vehicles and 80 a minimum of 120 vehicles).
There is no employment in Norton Lindsey to support development. Further the addition of housing will not create any employment. Accordingly development on the scale envisaged runs counter to many of the aspirations as set out in both the Preferred Options document but also the NPPF.
The historic built environment restricts options to improve roads, which would also fundamentally ruin the context and integrity of the buildings.
Development may impact on the conservation areas and the overall historic environment. It is essential need to protect Norton Lindsey' unique heritage for current and future generations and avoid impacting on views and features
Due to environmental considerations and build standards to minimise carbon emissions together with affordable housing contributions, this may mean that such locations as Norton Lindsey are economically unviable to be brought forward for development. Also reference to earlier comments about promoting unsustainable transport.
Agree with the principle of inclusive, safe and healthy communities, but Norton Lindsey is an unsuitable site as it is not within a wide range of facilities.
Standard Response Representation Attached. Text copied below:
Norton Lindsey Village response to Warwick District Council consultation May 2012
New Local Plan Preferred Options
Sheet 1 of 1
Which document are you responding to? Preferred Options (Full Version)
Which part of the document are you responding to? Preferred Option 1 (P01)
Paragraph number I Heading I Subheading (if relevant) - 5.6, 5.10, 5.12, 5.13, 5.15, 5.18,5.22
What is the nature of your representation? OBJECT
Part 1 -Setting the Scene and Summary
P01 - Preferred Level of Growth
OBJECT
It is agreed that some growth will be required during the 2014-2029 period to sustain an
economic and vibrant economy. An increase in homes of appropriate tenures will be
required but the level of growth based on the economic predictions certainly over the
next five years seems excessive especially when viewed against the economic
backdrop. This comment is supported by Office of National Statistics data which reveals
that the rate of increase of Gross Domestic Product has been falling since mid 2010 and
has yet to show signs of recovery. On this basis growth has been downgraded to 0.7%
from 0.8%. Predictions from the respected International Monetary Fund have revised
expectations of growth of 0.8% down to 0.2% with a very modest almost "flat
lining"growth of 0.6% in 2013. Accordingly the base figures being utilised are over
stated.
We believe that the demand for further housing in Norton Lindsey is limited and can be
adequately met by windfall sites and as has been historically the case utilising previously
used land and buildings.
Changes to Preferred Option 1 -adopt a more conservative growth pattern to
reflect market conditions which are likely to prevail over the first half of the Plan
period.
Definitions:
NPPF-National Planning Policy Framework: WOe-Warwick District Council: SOC-Stratford upon Avon District Council
Agent's contact details:
Object
Preferred Options
Representation ID: 51484
Received: 27/07/2012
Respondent: James Robins
The proposed level of development is entirely inappropriate and of such a scale (25% increase at 30 homes and 65% increase at 80 homes) that it would cause irreparable harm to the village. It is also disproportionate to the scale and massing of the village and the approach needs to be reconsidered.
Norton Lindsey is uniquely located on the border with SDC and WDC - there are concerns that should SDC decide in their local plan to build up to the Norton Lindsey boundary and WDC wishes to place up to 80 new properties within Norton Lindsey, the cumulative effect would completely decimate the village.
There is a need for an inspector to consider the plans for WDC and SDC together and to take Norton Lindsey out of the immediate process to allow thw above to happen.
There is a statutory requirement for evidence of local housing need to be identified prior to any development being undertaken - the last local housing need survey indicated a need for 3 dwellings in Norton Lindsey - the quota of between 30-80 dwellings would appear to be far and above the local housing need. Norton Lindsey has also benefited from a number of affordable homes schemes over the years and is now well served by affordable housing of various tenures and sizes.
Norton Lindsey does not fulfil the transport criteria to mimimise the need to travel or access to sustainable forms of transport:
- There is no regular public transport
- Main Street is very narrow with many houses abutting the road and a number having accommodation at lower than street level / additional traffic may damage buildings
- The road structures along and leading from the village have bad bends, very narrow sections and no passing places - serious accidents have taken place.
- Norton Lindsey is too remote for walking to destinations such as Warwick and Leamington Spa and due to the road infrastructure cycling is dangerous.
- Parking is a problem with new residential schemes providing insufficient on-site parking causing congestion and safety hazards (30 dwellings could provide an additional 60 vehicles and 80 a minimum of 120 vehicles).
There is no employment in Norton Lindsey to support development. Further the addition of housing will not create any employment. Accordingly development on the scale envisaged runs counter to many of the aspirations as set out in both the Preferred Options document but also the NPPF.
The historic built environment restricts options to improve roads, which would also fundamentally ruin the context and integrity of the buildings.
Development may impact on the conservation areas and the overall historic environment. It is essential need to protect Norton Lindsey' unique heritage for current and future generations and avoid impacting on views and features
Due to environmental considerations and build standards to minimise carbon emissions together with affordable housing contributions, this may mean that such locations as Norton Lindsey are economically unviable to be brought forward for development. Also reference to earlier comments about promoting unsustainable transport.
Agree with the principle of inclusive, safe and healthy communities, but Norton Lindsey is an unsuitable site as it is not within a wide range of facilities.
Standard Response Representation Attached. Text copied below:
Norton Lindsey Village response to Warwick District Council consultation May 2012
New Local Plan Preferred Options
Sheet 1 of 1
Which document are you responding to? Preferred Options (Full Version)
Which part of the document are you responding to? Preferred Option 1 (P01)
Paragraph number I Heading I Subheading (if relevant) - 5.6, 5.10, 5.12, 5.13, 5.15, 5.18,5.22
What is the nature of your representation? OBJECT
Part 1 -Setting the Scene and Summary
P01 - Preferred Level of Growth
OBJECT
It is agreed that some growth will be required during the 2014-2029 period to sustain an
economic and vibrant economy. An increase in homes of appropriate tenures will be
required but the level of growth based on the economic predictions certainly over the
next five years seems excessive especially when viewed against the economic
backdrop. This comment is supported by Office of National Statistics data which reveals
that the rate of increase of Gross Domestic Product has been falling since mid 2010 and
has yet to show signs of recovery. On this basis growth has been downgraded to 0.7%
from 0.8%. Predictions from the respected International Monetary Fund have revised
expectations of growth of 0.8% down to 0.2% with a very modest almost "flat
lining"growth of 0.6% in 2013. Accordingly the base figures being utilised are over
stated.
We believe that the demand for further housing in Norton Lindsey is limited and can be
adequately met by windfall sites and as has been historically the case utilising previously
used land and buildings.
Changes to Preferred Option 1 -adopt a more conservative growth pattern to
reflect market conditions which are likely to prevail over the first half of the Plan
period.
Definitions:
NPPF-National Planning Policy Framework: WOe-Warwick District Council: SOC-Stratford upon Avon District Council
Agent's contact details:
Object
Preferred Options
Representation ID: 51494
Received: 27/07/2012
Respondent: Charley May
The proposed level of development is entirely inappropriate and of such a scale (25% increase at 30 homes and 65% increase at 80 homes) that it would cause irreparable harm to the village. It is also disproportionate to the scale and massing of the village and the approach needs to be reconsidered.
Norton Lindsey is uniquely located on the border with SDC and WDC - there are concerns that should SDC decide in their local plan to build up to the Norton Lindsey boundary and WDC wishes to place up to 80 new properties within Norton Lindsey, the cumulative effect would completely decimate the village.
There is a need for an inspector to consider the plans for WDC and SDC together and to take Norton Lindsey out of the immediate process to allow thw above to happen.
There is a statutory requirement for evidence of local housing need to be identified prior to any development being undertaken - the last local housing need survey indicated a need for 3 dwellings in Norton Lindsey - the quota of between 30-80 dwellings would appear to be far and above the local housing need. Norton Lindsey has also benefited from a number of affordable homes schemes over the years and is now well served by affordable housing of various tenures and sizes.
Norton Lindsey does not fulfil the transport criteria to mimimise the need to travel or access to sustainable forms of transport:
- There is no regular public transport
- Main Street is very narrow with many houses abutting the road and a number having accommodation at lower than street level / additional traffic may damage buildings
- The road structures along and leading from the village have bad bends, very narrow sections and no passing places - serious accidents have taken place.
- Norton Lindsey is too remote for walking to destinations such as Warwick and Leamington Spa and due to the road infrastructure cycling is dangerous.
- Parking is a problem with new residential schemes providing insufficient on-site parking causing congestion and safety hazards (30 dwellings could provide an additional 60 vehicles and 80 a minimum of 120 vehicles).
There is no employment in Norton Lindsey to support development. Further the addition of housing will not create any employment. Accordingly development on the scale envisaged runs counter to many of the aspirations as set out in both the Preferred Options document but also the NPPF.
The historic built environment restricts options to improve roads, which would also fundamentally ruin the context and integrity of the buildings.
Development may impact on the conservation areas and the overall historic environment. It is essential need to protect Norton Lindsey' unique heritage for current and future generations and avoid impacting on views and features
Due to environmental considerations and build standards to minimise carbon emissions together with affordable housing contributions, this may mean that such locations as Norton Lindsey are economically unviable to be brought forward for development. Also reference to earlier comments about promoting unsustainable transport.
Agree with the principle of inclusive, safe and healthy communities, but Norton Lindsey is an unsuitable site as it is not within a wide range of facilities.
Standard Response Representation Attached. Text copied below:
Norton Lindsey Village response to Warwick District Council consultation May 2012
New Local Plan Preferred Options
Sheet 1 of 1
Which document are you responding to? Preferred Options (Full Version)
Which part of the document are you responding to? Preferred Option 1 (P01)
Paragraph number I Heading I Subheading (if relevant) - 5.6, 5.10, 5.12, 5.13, 5.15, 5.18,5.22
What is the nature of your representation? OBJECT
Part 1 -Setting the Scene and Summary
P01 - Preferred Level of Growth
OBJECT
It is agreed that some growth will be required during the 2014-2029 period to sustain an
economic and vibrant economy. An increase in homes of appropriate tenures will be
required but the level of growth based on the economic predictions certainly over the
next five years seems excessive especially when viewed against the economic
backdrop. This comment is supported by Office of National Statistics data which reveals
that the rate of increase of Gross Domestic Product has been falling since mid 2010 and
has yet to show signs of recovery. On this basis growth has been downgraded to 0.7%
from 0.8%. Predictions from the respected International Monetary Fund have revised
expectations of growth of 0.8% down to 0.2% with a very modest almost "flat
lining"growth of 0.6% in 2013. Accordingly the base figures being utilised are over
stated.
We believe that the demand for further housing in Norton Lindsey is limited and can be
adequately met by windfall sites and as has been historically the case utilising previously
used land and buildings.
Changes to Preferred Option 1 -adopt a more conservative growth pattern to
reflect market conditions which are likely to prevail over the first half of the Plan
period.
Definitions:
NPPF-National Planning Policy Framework: WOe-Warwick District Council: SOC-Stratford upon Avon District Council
Agent's contact details:
Object
Preferred Options
Representation ID: 51504
Received: 27/07/2012
Respondent: Peter Jackson
The proposed level of development is entirely inappropriate and of such a scale (25% increase at 30 homes and 65% increase at 80 homes) that it would cause irreparable harm to the village. It is also disproportionate to the scale and massing of the village and the approach needs to be reconsidered.
Norton Lindsey is uniquely located on the border with SDC and WDC - there are concerns that should SDC decide in their local plan to build up to the Norton Lindsey boundary and WDC wishes to place up to 80 new properties within Norton Lindsey, the cumulative effect would completely decimate the village.
There is a need for an inspector to consider the plans for WDC and SDC together and to take Norton Lindsey out of the immediate process to allow thw above to happen.
There is a statutory requirement for evidence of local housing need to be identified prior to any development being undertaken - the last local housing need survey indicated a need for 3 dwellings in Norton Lindsey - the quota of between 30-80 dwellings would appear to be far and above the local housing need. Norton Lindsey has also benefited from a number of affordable homes schemes over the years and is now well served by affordable housing of various tenures and sizes.
Norton Lindsey does not fulfil the transport criteria to mimimise the need to travel or access to sustainable forms of transport:
- There is no regular public transport
- Main Street is very narrow with many houses abutting the road and a number having accommodation at lower than street level / additional traffic may damage buildings
- The road structures along and leading from the village have bad bends, very narrow sections and no passing places - serious accidents have taken place.
- Norton Lindsey is too remote for walking to destinations such as Warwick and Leamington Spa and due to the road infrastructure cycling is dangerous.
- Parking is a problem with new residential schemes providing insufficient on-site parking causing congestion and safety hazards (30 dwellings could provide an additional 60 vehicles and 80 a minimum of 120 vehicles).
There is no employment in Norton Lindsey to support development. Further the addition of housing will not create any employment. Accordingly development on the scale envisaged runs counter to many of the aspirations as set out in both the Preferred Options document but also the NPPF.
The historic built environment restricts options to improve roads, which would also fundamentally ruin the context and integrity of the buildings.
Development may impact on the conservation areas and the overall historic environment. It is essential need to protect Norton Lindsey' unique heritage for current and future generations and avoid impacting on views and features
Due to environmental considerations and build standards to minimise carbon emissions together with affordable housing contributions, this may mean that such locations as Norton Lindsey are economically unviable to be brought forward for development. Also reference to earlier comments about promoting unsustainable transport.
Agree with the principle of inclusive, safe and healthy communities, but Norton Lindsey is an unsuitable site as it is not within a wide range of facilities.
Standard Response Representation Attached. Text copied below:
Norton Lindsey Village response to Warwick District Council consultation May 2012
New Local Plan Preferred Options
Sheet 1 of 1
Which document are you responding to? Preferred Options (Full Version)
Which part of the document are you responding to? Preferred Option 1 (P01)
Paragraph number I Heading I Subheading (if relevant) - 5.6, 5.10, 5.12, 5.13, 5.15, 5.18,5.22
What is the nature of your representation? OBJECT
Part 1 -Setting the Scene and Summary
P01 - Preferred Level of Growth
OBJECT
It is agreed that some growth will be required during the 2014-2029 period to sustain an
economic and vibrant economy. An increase in homes of appropriate tenures will be
required but the level of growth based on the economic predictions certainly over the
next five years seems excessive especially when viewed against the economic
backdrop. This comment is supported by Office of National Statistics data which reveals
that the rate of increase of Gross Domestic Product has been falling since mid 2010 and
has yet to show signs of recovery. On this basis growth has been downgraded to 0.7%
from 0.8%. Predictions from the respected International Monetary Fund have revised
expectations of growth of 0.8% down to 0.2% with a very modest almost "flat
lining"growth of 0.6% in 2013. Accordingly the base figures being utilised are over
stated.
We believe that the demand for further housing in Norton Lindsey is limited and can be
adequately met by windfall sites and as has been historically the case utilising previously
used land and buildings.
Changes to Preferred Option 1 -adopt a more conservative growth pattern to
reflect market conditions which are likely to prevail over the first half of the Plan
period.
Definitions:
NPPF-National Planning Policy Framework: WOe-Warwick District Council: SOC-Stratford upon Avon District Council
Agent's contact details:
Object
Preferred Options
Representation ID: 51514
Received: 27/07/2012
Respondent: Katie Bard
The proposed level of development is entirely inappropriate and of such a scale (25% increase at 30 homes and 65% increase at 80 homes) that it would cause irreparable harm to the village. It is also disproportionate to the scale and massing of the village and the approach needs to be reconsidered.
Norton Lindsey is uniquely located on the border with SDC and WDC - there are concerns that should SDC decide in their local plan to build up to the Norton Lindsey boundary and WDC wishes to place up to 80 new properties within Norton Lindsey, the cumulative effect would completely decimate the village.
There is a need for an inspector to consider the plans for WDC and SDC together and to take Norton Lindsey out of the immediate process to allow thw above to happen.
There is a statutory requirement for evidence of local housing need to be identified prior to any development being undertaken - the last local housing need survey indicated a need for 3 dwellings in Norton Lindsey - the quota of between 30-80 dwellings would appear to be far and above the local housing need. Norton Lindsey has also benefited from a number of affordable homes schemes over the years and is now well served by affordable housing of various tenures and sizes.
Norton Lindsey does not fulfil the transport criteria to mimimise the need to travel or access to sustainable forms of transport:
- There is no regular public transport
- Main Street is very narrow with many houses abutting the road and a number having accommodation at lower than street level / additional traffic may damage buildings
- The road structures along and leading from the village have bad bends, very narrow sections and no passing places - serious accidents have taken place.
- Norton Lindsey is too remote for walking to destinations such as Warwick and Leamington Spa and due to the road infrastructure cycling is dangerous.
- Parking is a problem with new residential schemes providing insufficient on-site parking causing congestion and safety hazards (30 dwellings could provide an additional 60 vehicles and 80 a minimum of 120 vehicles).
There is no employment in Norton Lindsey to support development. Further the addition of housing will not create any employment. Accordingly development on the scale envisaged runs counter to many of the aspirations as set out in both the Preferred Options document but also the NPPF.
The historic built environment restricts options to improve roads, which would also fundamentally ruin the context and integrity of the buildings.
Development may impact on the conservation areas and the overall historic environment. It is essential need to protect Norton Lindsey' unique heritage for current and future generations and avoid impacting on views and features
Due to environmental considerations and build standards to minimise carbon emissions together with affordable housing contributions, this may mean that such locations as Norton Lindsey are economically unviable to be brought forward for development. Also reference to earlier comments about promoting unsustainable transport.
Agree with the principle of inclusive, safe and healthy communities, but Norton Lindsey is an unsuitable site as it is not within a wide range of facilities.
Standard Response Representation Attached. Text copied below:
Norton Lindsey Village response to Warwick District Council consultation May 2012
New Local Plan Preferred Options
Sheet 1 of 1
Which document are you responding to? Preferred Options (Full Version)
Which part of the document are you responding to? Preferred Option 1 (P01)
Paragraph number I Heading I Subheading (if relevant) - 5.6, 5.10, 5.12, 5.13, 5.15, 5.18,5.22
What is the nature of your representation? OBJECT
Part 1 -Setting the Scene and Summary
P01 - Preferred Level of Growth
OBJECT
It is agreed that some growth will be required during the 2014-2029 period to sustain an
economic and vibrant economy. An increase in homes of appropriate tenures will be
required but the level of growth based on the economic predictions certainly over the
next five years seems excessive especially when viewed against the economic
backdrop. This comment is supported by Office of National Statistics data which reveals
that the rate of increase of Gross Domestic Product has been falling since mid 2010 and
has yet to show signs of recovery. On this basis growth has been downgraded to 0.7%
from 0.8%. Predictions from the respected International Monetary Fund have revised
expectations of growth of 0.8% down to 0.2% with a very modest almost "flat
lining"growth of 0.6% in 2013. Accordingly the base figures being utilised are over
stated.
We believe that the demand for further housing in Norton Lindsey is limited and can be
adequately met by windfall sites and as has been historically the case utilising previously
used land and buildings.
Changes to Preferred Option 1 -adopt a more conservative growth pattern to
reflect market conditions which are likely to prevail over the first half of the Plan
period.
Definitions:
NPPF-National Planning Policy Framework: WOe-Warwick District Council: SOC-Stratford upon Avon District Council
Agent's contact details:
Object
Preferred Options
Representation ID: 51524
Received: 27/07/2012
Respondent: Jackie Mullen
The proposed level of development is entirely inappropriate and of such a scale (25% increase at 30 homes and 65% increase at 80 homes) that it would cause irreparable harm to the village. It is also disproportionate to the scale and massing of the village and the approach needs to be reconsidered.
Norton Lindsey is uniquely located on the border with SDC and WDC - there are concerns that should SDC decide in their local plan to build up to the Norton Lindsey boundary and WDC wishes to place up to 80 new properties within Norton Lindsey, the cumulative effect would completely decimate the village.
There is a need for an inspector to consider the plans for WDC and SDC together and to take Norton Lindsey out of the immediate process to allow thw above to happen.
There is a statutory requirement for evidence of local housing need to be identified prior to any development being undertaken - the last local housing need survey indicated a need for 3 dwellings in Norton Lindsey - the quota of between 30-80 dwellings would appear to be far and above the local housing need. Norton Lindsey has also benefited from a number of affordable homes schemes over the years and is now well served by affordable housing of various tenures and sizes.
Norton Lindsey does not fulfil the transport criteria to mimimise the need to travel or access to sustainable forms of transport:
- There is no regular public transport
- Main Street is very narrow with many houses abutting the road and a number having accommodation at lower than street level / additional traffic may damage buildings
- The road structures along and leading from the village have bad bends, very narrow sections and no passing places - serious accidents have taken place.
- Norton Lindsey is too remote for walking to destinations such as Warwick and Leamington Spa and due to the road infrastructure cycling is dangerous.
- Parking is a problem with new residential schemes providing insufficient on-site parking causing congestion and safety hazards (30 dwellings could provide an additional 60 vehicles and 80 a minimum of 120 vehicles).
There is no employment in Norton Lindsey to support development. Further the addition of housing will not create any employment. Accordingly development on the scale envisaged runs counter to many of the aspirations as set out in both the Preferred Options document but also the NPPF.
The historic built environment restricts options to improve roads, which would also fundamentally ruin the context and integrity of the buildings.
Development may impact on the conservation areas and the overall historic environment. It is essential need to protect Norton Lindsey' unique heritage for current and future generations and avoid impacting on views and features
Due to environmental considerations and build standards to minimise carbon emissions together with affordable housing contributions, this may mean that such locations as Norton Lindsey are economically unviable to be brought forward for development. Also reference to earlier comments about promoting unsustainable transport.
Agree with the principle of inclusive, safe and healthy communities, but Norton Lindsey is an unsuitable site as it is not within a wide range of facilities.
Standard Response Representation Attached. Text copied below:
Norton Lindsey Village response to Warwick District Council consultation May 2012
New Local Plan Preferred Options
Sheet 1 of 1
Which document are you responding to? Preferred Options (Full Version)
Which part of the document are you responding to? Preferred Option 1 (P01)
Paragraph number I Heading I Subheading (if relevant) - 5.6, 5.10, 5.12, 5.13, 5.15, 5.18,5.22
What is the nature of your representation? OBJECT
Part 1 -Setting the Scene and Summary
P01 - Preferred Level of Growth
OBJECT
It is agreed that some growth will be required during the 2014-2029 period to sustain an
economic and vibrant economy. An increase in homes of appropriate tenures will be
required but the level of growth based on the economic predictions certainly over the
next five years seems excessive especially when viewed against the economic
backdrop. This comment is supported by Office of National Statistics data which reveals
that the rate of increase of Gross Domestic Product has been falling since mid 2010 and
has yet to show signs of recovery. On this basis growth has been downgraded to 0.7%
from 0.8%. Predictions from the respected International Monetary Fund have revised
expectations of growth of 0.8% down to 0.2% with a very modest almost "flat
lining"growth of 0.6% in 2013. Accordingly the base figures being utilised are over
stated.
We believe that the demand for further housing in Norton Lindsey is limited and can be
adequately met by windfall sites and as has been historically the case utilising previously
used land and buildings.
Changes to Preferred Option 1 -adopt a more conservative growth pattern to
reflect market conditions which are likely to prevail over the first half of the Plan
period.
Definitions:
NPPF-National Planning Policy Framework: WOe-Warwick District Council: SOC-Stratford upon Avon District Council
Agent's contact details:
Object
Preferred Options
Representation ID: 51534
Received: 27/07/2012
Respondent: J Schirmer
The proposed level of development is entirely inappropriate and of such a scale (25% increase at 30 homes and 65% increase at 80 homes) that it would cause irreparable harm to the village. It is also disproportionate to the scale and massing of the village and the approach needs to be reconsidered.
Norton Lindsey is uniquely located on the border with SDC and WDC - there are concerns that should SDC decide in their local plan to build up to the Norton Lindsey boundary and WDC wishes to place up to 80 new properties within Norton Lindsey, the cumulative effect would completely decimate the village.
There is a need for an inspector to consider the plans for WDC and SDC together and to take Norton Lindsey out of the immediate process to allow thw above to happen.
There is a statutory requirement for evidence of local housing need to be identified prior to any development being undertaken - the last local housing need survey indicated a need for 3 dwellings in Norton Lindsey - the quota of between 30-80 dwellings would appear to be far and above the local housing need. Norton Lindsey has also benefited from a number of affordable homes schemes over the years and is now well served by affordable housing of various tenures and sizes.
Norton Lindsey does not fulfil the transport criteria to mimimise the need to travel or access to sustainable forms of transport:
- There is no regular public transport
- Main Street is very narrow with many houses abutting the road and a number having accommodation at lower than street level / additional traffic may damage buildings
- The road structures along and leading from the village have bad bends, very narrow sections and no passing places - serious accidents have taken place.
- Norton Lindsey is too remote for walking to destinations such as Warwick and Leamington Spa and due to the road infrastructure cycling is dangerous.
- Parking is a problem with new residential schemes providing insufficient on-site parking causing congestion and safety hazards (30 dwellings could provide an additional 60 vehicles and 80 a minimum of 120 vehicles).
There is no employment in Norton Lindsey to support development. Further the addition of housing will not create any employment. Accordingly development on the scale envisaged runs counter to many of the aspirations as set out in both the Preferred Options document but also the NPPF.
The historic built environment restricts options to improve roads, which would also fundamentally ruin the context and integrity of the buildings.
Development may impact on the conservation areas and the overall historic environment. It is essential need to protect Norton Lindsey' unique heritage for current and future generations and avoid impacting on views and features
Due to environmental considerations and build standards to minimise carbon emissions together with affordable housing contributions, this may mean that such locations as Norton Lindsey are economically unviable to be brought forward for development. Also reference to earlier comments about promoting unsustainable transport.
Agree with the principle of inclusive, safe and healthy communities, but Norton Lindsey is an unsuitable site as it is not within a wide range of facilities.
Standard Response Representation Attached. Text copied below:
Norton Lindsey Village response to Warwick District Council consultation May 2012
New Local Plan Preferred Options
Sheet 1 of 1
Which document are you responding to? Preferred Options (Full Version)
Which part of the document are you responding to? Preferred Option 1 (P01)
Paragraph number I Heading I Subheading (if relevant) - 5.6, 5.10, 5.12, 5.13, 5.15, 5.18,5.22
What is the nature of your representation? OBJECT
Part 1 -Setting the Scene and Summary
P01 - Preferred Level of Growth
OBJECT
It is agreed that some growth will be required during the 2014-2029 period to sustain an
economic and vibrant economy. An increase in homes of appropriate tenures will be
required but the level of growth based on the economic predictions certainly over the
next five years seems excessive especially when viewed against the economic
backdrop. This comment is supported by Office of National Statistics data which reveals
that the rate of increase of Gross Domestic Product has been falling since mid 2010 and
has yet to show signs of recovery. On this basis growth has been downgraded to 0.7%
from 0.8%. Predictions from the respected International Monetary Fund have revised
expectations of growth of 0.8% down to 0.2% with a very modest almost "flat
lining"growth of 0.6% in 2013. Accordingly the base figures being utilised are over
stated.
We believe that the demand for further housing in Norton Lindsey is limited and can be
adequately met by windfall sites and as has been historically the case utilising previously
used land and buildings.
Changes to Preferred Option 1 -adopt a more conservative growth pattern to
reflect market conditions which are likely to prevail over the first half of the Plan
period.
Definitions:
NPPF-National Planning Policy Framework: WOe-Warwick District Council: SOC-Stratford upon Avon District Council
Agent's contact details:
Object
Preferred Options
Representation ID: 51544
Received: 27/07/2012
Respondent: Colin Perry
The proposed level of development is entirely inappropriate and of such a scale (25% increase at 30 homes and 65% increase at 80 homes) that it would cause irreparable harm to the village. It is also disproportionate to the scale and massing of the village and the approach needs to be reconsidered.
Norton Lindsey is uniquely located on the border with SDC and WDC - there are concerns that should SDC decide in their local plan to build up to the Norton Lindsey boundary and WDC wishes to place up to 80 new properties within Norton Lindsey, the cumulative effect would completely decimate the village.
There is a need for an inspector to consider the plans for WDC and SDC together and to take Norton Lindsey out of the immediate process to allow thw above to happen.
There is a statutory requirement for evidence of local housing need to be identified prior to any development being undertaken - the last local housing need survey indicated a need for 3 dwellings in Norton Lindsey - the quota of between 30-80 dwellings would appear to be far and above the local housing need. Norton Lindsey has also benefited from a number of affordable homes schemes over the years and is now well served by affordable housing of various tenures and sizes.
Norton Lindsey does not fulfil the transport criteria to mimimise the need to travel or access to sustainable forms of transport:
- There is no regular public transport
- Main Street is very narrow with many houses abutting the road and a number having accommodation at lower than street level / additional traffic may damage buildings
- The road structures along and leading from the village have bad bends, very narrow sections and no passing places - serious accidents have taken place.
- Norton Lindsey is too remote for walking to destinations such as Warwick and Leamington Spa and due to the road infrastructure cycling is dangerous.
- Parking is a problem with new residential schemes providing insufficient on-site parking causing congestion and safety hazards (30 dwellings could provide an additional 60 vehicles and 80 a minimum of 120 vehicles).
There is no employment in Norton Lindsey to support development. Further the addition of housing will not create any employment. Accordingly development on the scale envisaged runs counter to many of the aspirations as set out in both the Preferred Options document but also the NPPF.
The historic built environment restricts options to improve roads, which would also fundamentally ruin the context and integrity of the buildings.
Development may impact on the conservation areas and the overall historic environment. It is essential need to protect Norton Lindsey' unique heritage for current and future generations and avoid impacting on views and features
Due to environmental considerations and build standards to minimise carbon emissions together with affordable housing contributions, this may mean that such locations as Norton Lindsey are economically unviable to be brought forward for development. Also reference to earlier comments about promoting unsustainable transport.
Agree with the principle of inclusive, safe and healthy communities, but Norton Lindsey is an unsuitable site as it is not within a wide range of facilities.
Standard Response Representation Attached. Text copied below:
Norton Lindsey Village response to Warwick District Council consultation May 2012
New Local Plan Preferred Options
Sheet 1 of 1
Which document are you responding to? Preferred Options (Full Version)
Which part of the document are you responding to? Preferred Option 1 (P01)
Paragraph number I Heading I Subheading (if relevant) - 5.6, 5.10, 5.12, 5.13, 5.15, 5.18,5.22
What is the nature of your representation? OBJECT
Part 1 -Setting the Scene and Summary
P01 - Preferred Level of Growth
OBJECT
It is agreed that some growth will be required during the 2014-2029 period to sustain an
economic and vibrant economy. An increase in homes of appropriate tenures will be
required but the level of growth based on the economic predictions certainly over the
next five years seems excessive especially when viewed against the economic
backdrop. This comment is supported by Office of National Statistics data which reveals
that the rate of increase of Gross Domestic Product has been falling since mid 2010 and
has yet to show signs of recovery. On this basis growth has been downgraded to 0.7%
from 0.8%. Predictions from the respected International Monetary Fund have revised
expectations of growth of 0.8% down to 0.2% with a very modest almost "flat
lining"growth of 0.6% in 2013. Accordingly the base figures being utilised are over
stated.
We believe that the demand for further housing in Norton Lindsey is limited and can be
adequately met by windfall sites and as has been historically the case utilising previously
used land and buildings.
Changes to Preferred Option 1 -adopt a more conservative growth pattern to
reflect market conditions which are likely to prevail over the first half of the Plan
period.
Definitions:
NPPF-National Planning Policy Framework: WOe-Warwick District Council: SOC-Stratford upon Avon District Council
Agent's contact details:
Object
Preferred Options
Representation ID: 51554
Received: 27/07/2012
Respondent: Fiona Miller
The proposed level of development is entirely inappropriate and of such a scale (25% increase at 30 homes and 65% increase at 80 homes) that it would cause irreparable harm to the village. It is also disproportionate to the scale and massing of the village and the approach needs to be reconsidered.
Norton Lindsey is uniquely located on the border with SDC and WDC - there are concerns that should SDC decide in their local plan to build up to the Norton Lindsey boundary and WDC wishes to place up to 80 new properties within Norton Lindsey, the cumulative effect would completely decimate the village.
There is a need for an inspector to consider the plans for WDC and SDC together and to take Norton Lindsey out of the immediate process to allow thw above to happen.
There is a statutory requirement for evidence of local housing need to be identified prior to any development being undertaken - the last local housing need survey indicated a need for 3 dwellings in Norton Lindsey - the quota of between 30-80 dwellings would appear to be far and above the local housing need. Norton Lindsey has also benefited from a number of affordable homes schemes over the years and is now well served by affordable housing of various tenures and sizes.
Norton Lindsey does not fulfil the transport criteria to mimimise the need to travel or access to sustainable forms of transport:
- There is no regular public transport
- Main Street is very narrow with many houses abutting the road and a number having accommodation at lower than street level / additional traffic may damage buildings
- The road structures along and leading from the village have bad bends, very narrow sections and no passing places - serious accidents have taken place.
- Norton Lindsey is too remote for walking to destinations such as Warwick and Leamington Spa and due to the road infrastructure cycling is dangerous.
- Parking is a problem with new residential schemes providing insufficient on-site parking causing congestion and safety hazards (30 dwellings could provide an additional 60 vehicles and 80 a minimum of 120 vehicles).
There is no employment in Norton Lindsey to support development. Further the addition of housing will not create any employment. Accordingly development on the scale envisaged runs counter to many of the aspirations as set out in both the Preferred Options document but also the NPPF.
The historic built environment restricts options to improve roads, which would also fundamentally ruin the context and integrity of the buildings.
Development may impact on the conservation areas and the overall historic environment. It is essential need to protect Norton Lindsey' unique heritage for current and future generations and avoid impacting on views and features
Due to environmental considerations and build standards to minimise carbon emissions together with affordable housing contributions, this may mean that such locations as Norton Lindsey are economically unviable to be brought forward for development. Also reference to earlier comments about promoting unsustainable transport.
Agree with the principle of inclusive, safe and healthy communities, but Norton Lindsey is an unsuitable site as it is not within a wide range of facilities.
Standard Response Representation Attached. Text copied below:
Norton Lindsey Village response to Warwick District Council consultation May 2012
New Local Plan Preferred Options
Sheet 1 of 1
Which document are you responding to? Preferred Options (Full Version)
Which part of the document are you responding to? Preferred Option 1 (P01)
Paragraph number I Heading I Subheading (if relevant) - 5.6, 5.10, 5.12, 5.13, 5.15, 5.18,5.22
What is the nature of your representation? OBJECT
Part 1 -Setting the Scene and Summary
P01 - Preferred Level of Growth
OBJECT
It is agreed that some growth will be required during the 2014-2029 period to sustain an
economic and vibrant economy. An increase in homes of appropriate tenures will be
required but the level of growth based on the economic predictions certainly over the
next five years seems excessive especially when viewed against the economic
backdrop. This comment is supported by Office of National Statistics data which reveals
that the rate of increase of Gross Domestic Product has been falling since mid 2010 and
has yet to show signs of recovery. On this basis growth has been downgraded to 0.7%
from 0.8%. Predictions from the respected International Monetary Fund have revised
expectations of growth of 0.8% down to 0.2% with a very modest almost "flat
lining"growth of 0.6% in 2013. Accordingly the base figures being utilised are over
stated.
We believe that the demand for further housing in Norton Lindsey is limited and can be
adequately met by windfall sites and as has been historically the case utilising previously
used land and buildings.
Changes to Preferred Option 1 -adopt a more conservative growth pattern to
reflect market conditions which are likely to prevail over the first half of the Plan
period.
Definitions:
NPPF-National Planning Policy Framework: WOe-Warwick District Council: SOC-Stratford upon Avon District Council
Agent's contact details:
Object
Preferred Options
Representation ID: 51564
Received: 27/07/2012
Respondent: C Jorgensen
The proposed level of development is entirely inappropriate and of such a scale (25% increase at 30 homes and 65% increase at 80 homes) that it would cause irreparable harm to the village. It is also disproportionate to the scale and massing of the village and the approach needs to be reconsidered.
Norton Lindsey is uniquely located on the border with SDC and WDC - there are concerns that should SDC decide in their local plan to build up to the Norton Lindsey boundary and WDC wishes to place up to 80 new properties within Norton Lindsey, the cumulative effect would completely decimate the village.
There is a need for an inspector to consider the plans for WDC and SDC together and to take Norton Lindsey out of the immediate process to allow thw above to happen.
There is a statutory requirement for evidence of local housing need to be identified prior to any development being undertaken - the last local housing need survey indicated a need for 3 dwellings in Norton Lindsey - the quota of between 30-80 dwellings would appear to be far and above the local housing need. Norton Lindsey has also benefited from a number of affordable homes schemes over the years and is now well served by affordable housing of various tenures and sizes.
Norton Lindsey does not fulfil the transport criteria to mimimise the need to travel or access to sustainable forms of transport:
- There is no regular public transport
- Main Street is very narrow with many houses abutting the road and a number having accommodation at lower than street level / additional traffic may damage buildings
- The road structures along and leading from the village have bad bends, very narrow sections and no passing places - serious accidents have taken place.
- Norton Lindsey is too remote for walking to destinations such as Warwick and Leamington Spa and due to the road infrastructure cycling is dangerous.
- Parking is a problem with new residential schemes providing insufficient on-site parking causing congestion and safety hazards (30 dwellings could provide an additional 60 vehicles and 80 a minimum of 120 vehicles).
There is no employment in Norton Lindsey to support development. Further the addition of housing will not create any employment. Accordingly development on the scale envisaged runs counter to many of the aspirations as set out in both the Preferred Options document but also the NPPF.
The historic built environment restricts options to improve roads, which would also fundamentally ruin the context and integrity of the buildings.
Development may impact on the conservation areas and the overall historic environment. It is essential need to protect Norton Lindsey' unique heritage for current and future generations and avoid impacting on views and features
Due to environmental considerations and build standards to minimise carbon emissions together with affordable housing contributions, this may mean that such locations as Norton Lindsey are economically unviable to be brought forward for development. Also reference to earlier comments about promoting unsustainable transport.
Agree with the principle of inclusive, safe and healthy communities, but Norton Lindsey is an unsuitable site as it is not within a wide range of facilities.
Standard Response Representation Attached. Text copied below:
Norton Lindsey Village response to Warwick District Council consultation May 2012
New Local Plan Preferred Options
Sheet 1 of 1
Which document are you responding to? Preferred Options (Full Version)
Which part of the document are you responding to? Preferred Option 1 (P01)
Paragraph number I Heading I Subheading (if relevant) - 5.6, 5.10, 5.12, 5.13, 5.15, 5.18,5.22
What is the nature of your representation? OBJECT
Part 1 -Setting the Scene and Summary
P01 - Preferred Level of Growth
OBJECT
It is agreed that some growth will be required during the 2014-2029 period to sustain an
economic and vibrant economy. An increase in homes of appropriate tenures will be
required but the level of growth based on the economic predictions certainly over the
next five years seems excessive especially when viewed against the economic
backdrop. This comment is supported by Office of National Statistics data which reveals
that the rate of increase of Gross Domestic Product has been falling since mid 2010 and
has yet to show signs of recovery. On this basis growth has been downgraded to 0.7%
from 0.8%. Predictions from the respected International Monetary Fund have revised
expectations of growth of 0.8% down to 0.2% with a very modest almost "flat
lining"growth of 0.6% in 2013. Accordingly the base figures being utilised are over
stated.
We believe that the demand for further housing in Norton Lindsey is limited and can be
adequately met by windfall sites and as has been historically the case utilising previously
used land and buildings.
Changes to Preferred Option 1 -adopt a more conservative growth pattern to
reflect market conditions which are likely to prevail over the first half of the Plan
period.
Definitions:
NPPF-National Planning Policy Framework: WOe-Warwick District Council: SOC-Stratford upon Avon District Council
Agent's contact details:
Object
Preferred Options
Representation ID: 51574
Received: 27/07/2012
Respondent: Mrs Mary Calderbank
The proposed level of development is entirely inappropriate and of such a scale (25% increase at 30 homes and 65% increase at 80 homes) that it would cause irreparable harm to the village. It is also disproportionate to the scale and massing of the village and the approach needs to be reconsidered.
Norton Lindsey is uniquely located on the border with SDC and WDC - there are concerns that should SDC decide in their local plan to build up to the Norton Lindsey boundary and WDC wishes to place up to 80 new properties within Norton Lindsey, the cumulative effect would completely decimate the village.
There is a need for an inspector to consider the plans for WDC and SDC together and to take Norton Lindsey out of the immediate process to allow thw above to happen.
There is a statutory requirement for evidence of local housing need to be identified prior to any development being undertaken - the last local housing need survey indicated a need for 3 dwellings in Norton Lindsey - the quota of between 30-80 dwellings would appear to be far and above the local housing need. Norton Lindsey has also benefited from a number of affordable homes schemes over the years and is now well served by affordable housing of various tenures and sizes.
Norton Lindsey does not fulfil the transport criteria to mimimise the need to travel or access to sustainable forms of transport:
- There is no regular public transport
- Main Street is very narrow with many houses abutting the road and a number having accommodation at lower than street level / additional traffic may damage buildings
- The road structures along and leading from the village have bad bends, very narrow sections and no passing places - serious accidents have taken place.
- Norton Lindsey is too remote for walking to destinations such as Warwick and Leamington Spa and due to the road infrastructure cycling is dangerous.
- Parking is a problem with new residential schemes providing insufficient on-site parking causing congestion and safety hazards (30 dwellings could provide an additional 60 vehicles and 80 a minimum of 120 vehicles).
There is no employment in Norton Lindsey to support development. Further the addition of housing will not create any employment. Accordingly development on the scale envisaged runs counter to many of the aspirations as set out in both the Preferred Options document but also the NPPF.
The historic built environment restricts options to improve roads, which would also fundamentally ruin the context and integrity of the buildings.
Development may impact on the conservation areas and the overall historic environment. It is essential need to protect Norton Lindsey' unique heritage for current and future generations and avoid impacting on views and features
Due to environmental considerations and build standards to minimise carbon emissions together with affordable housing contributions, this may mean that such locations as Norton Lindsey are economically unviable to be brought forward for development. Also reference to earlier comments about promoting unsustainable transport.
Agree with the principle of inclusive, safe and healthy communities, but Norton Lindsey is an unsuitable site as it is not within a wide range of facilities.
Standard Response Representation Attached. Text copied below:
Norton Lindsey Village response to Warwick District Council consultation May 2012
New Local Plan Preferred Options
Sheet 1 of 1
Which document are you responding to? Preferred Options (Full Version)
Which part of the document are you responding to? Preferred Option 1 (P01)
Paragraph number I Heading I Subheading (if relevant) - 5.6, 5.10, 5.12, 5.13, 5.15, 5.18,5.22
What is the nature of your representation? OBJECT
Part 1 -Setting the Scene and Summary
P01 - Preferred Level of Growth
OBJECT
It is agreed that some growth will be required during the 2014-2029 period to sustain an
economic and vibrant economy. An increase in homes of appropriate tenures will be
required but the level of growth based on the economic predictions certainly over the
next five years seems excessive especially when viewed against the economic
backdrop. This comment is supported by Office of National Statistics data which reveals
that the rate of increase of Gross Domestic Product has been falling since mid 2010 and
has yet to show signs of recovery. On this basis growth has been downgraded to 0.7%
from 0.8%. Predictions from the respected International Monetary Fund have revised
expectations of growth of 0.8% down to 0.2% with a very modest almost "flat
lining"growth of 0.6% in 2013. Accordingly the base figures being utilised are over
stated.
We believe that the demand for further housing in Norton Lindsey is limited and can be
adequately met by windfall sites and as has been historically the case utilising previously
used land and buildings.
Changes to Preferred Option 1 -adopt a more conservative growth pattern to
reflect market conditions which are likely to prevail over the first half of the Plan
period.
Definitions:
NPPF-National Planning Policy Framework: WOe-Warwick District Council: SOC-Stratford upon Avon District Council
Agent's contact details:
Object
Preferred Options
Representation ID: 51584
Received: 27/07/2012
Respondent: Mrs Gillian Crisp
The proposed level of development is entirely inappropriate and of such a scale (25% increase at 30 homes and 65% increase at 80 homes) that it would cause irreparable harm to the village. It is also disproportionate to the scale and massing of the village and the approach needs to be reconsidered.
Norton Lindsey is uniquely located on the border with SDC and WDC - there are concerns that should SDC decide in their local plan to build up to the Norton Lindsey boundary and WDC wishes to place up to 80 new properties within Norton Lindsey, the cumulative effect would completely decimate the village.
There is a need for an inspector to consider the plans for WDC and SDC together and to take Norton Lindsey out of the immediate process to allow thw above to happen.
There is a statutory requirement for evidence of local housing need to be identified prior to any development being undertaken - the last local housing need survey indicated a need for 3 dwellings in Norton Lindsey - the quota of between 30-80 dwellings would appear to be far and above the local housing need. Norton Lindsey has also benefited from a number of affordable homes schemes over the years and is now well served by affordable housing of various tenures and sizes.
Norton Lindsey does not fulfil the transport criteria to mimimise the need to travel or access to sustainable forms of transport:
- There is no regular public transport
- Main Street is very narrow with many houses abutting the road and a number having accommodation at lower than street level / additional traffic may damage buildings
- The road structures along and leading from the village have bad bends, very narrow sections and no passing places - serious accidents have taken place.
- Norton Lindsey is too remote for walking to destinations such as Warwick and Leamington Spa and due to the road infrastructure cycling is dangerous.
- Parking is a problem with new residential schemes providing insufficient on-site parking causing congestion and safety hazards (30 dwellings could provide an additional 60 vehicles and 80 a minimum of 120 vehicles).
There is no employment in Norton Lindsey to support development. Further the addition of housing will not create any employment. Accordingly development on the scale envisaged runs counter to many of the aspirations as set out in both the Preferred Options document but also the NPPF.
The historic built environment restricts options to improve roads, which would also fundamentally ruin the context and integrity of the buildings.
Development may impact on the conservation areas and the overall historic environment. It is essential need to protect Norton Lindsey' unique heritage for current and future generations and avoid impacting on views and features
Due to environmental considerations and build standards to minimise carbon emissions together with affordable housing contributions, this may mean that such locations as Norton Lindsey are economically unviable to be brought forward for development. Also reference to earlier comments about promoting unsustainable transport.
Agree with the principle of inclusive, safe and healthy communities, but Norton Lindsey is an unsuitable site as it is not within a wide range of facilities.
Standard Response Representation Attached. Text copied below:
Norton Lindsey Village response to Warwick District Council consultation May 2012
New Local Plan Preferred Options
Sheet 1 of 1
Which document are you responding to? Preferred Options (Full Version)
Which part of the document are you responding to? Preferred Option 1 (P01)
Paragraph number I Heading I Subheading (if relevant) - 5.6, 5.10, 5.12, 5.13, 5.15, 5.18,5.22
What is the nature of your representation? OBJECT
Part 1 -Setting the Scene and Summary
P01 - Preferred Level of Growth
OBJECT
It is agreed that some growth will be required during the 2014-2029 period to sustain an
economic and vibrant economy. An increase in homes of appropriate tenures will be
required but the level of growth based on the economic predictions certainly over the
next five years seems excessive especially when viewed against the economic
backdrop. This comment is supported by Office of National Statistics data which reveals
that the rate of increase of Gross Domestic Product has been falling since mid 2010 and
has yet to show signs of recovery. On this basis growth has been downgraded to 0.7%
from 0.8%. Predictions from the respected International Monetary Fund have revised
expectations of growth of 0.8% down to 0.2% with a very modest almost "flat
lining"growth of 0.6% in 2013. Accordingly the base figures being utilised are over
stated.
We believe that the demand for further housing in Norton Lindsey is limited and can be
adequately met by windfall sites and as has been historically the case utilising previously
used land and buildings.
Changes to Preferred Option 1 -adopt a more conservative growth pattern to
reflect market conditions which are likely to prevail over the first half of the Plan
period.
Definitions:
NPPF-National Planning Policy Framework: WOe-Warwick District Council: SOC-Stratford upon Avon District Council
Agent's contact details:
Object
Preferred Options
Representation ID: 51594
Received: 27/07/2012
Respondent: Je Bewick
The proposed level of development is entirely inappropriate and of such a scale (25% increase at 30 homes and 65% increase at 80 homes) that it would cause irreparable harm to the village. It is also disproportionate to the scale and massing of the village and the approach needs to be reconsidered.
Norton Lindsey is uniquely located on the border with SDC and WDC - there are concerns that should SDC decide in their local plan to build up to the Norton Lindsey boundary and WDC wishes to place up to 80 new properties within Norton Lindsey, the cumulative effect would completely decimate the village.
There is a need for an inspector to consider the plans for WDC and SDC together and to take Norton Lindsey out of the immediate process to allow thw above to happen.
There is a statutory requirement for evidence of local housing need to be identified prior to any development being undertaken - the last local housing need survey indicated a need for 3 dwellings in Norton Lindsey - the quota of between 30-80 dwellings would appear to be far and above the local housing need. Norton Lindsey has also benefited from a number of affordable homes schemes over the years and is now well served by affordable housing of various tenures and sizes.
Norton Lindsey does not fulfil the transport criteria to mimimise the need to travel or access to sustainable forms of transport:
- There is no regular public transport
- Main Street is very narrow with many houses abutting the road and a number having accommodation at lower than street level / additional traffic may damage buildings
- The road structures along and leading from the village have bad bends, very narrow sections and no passing places - serious accidents have taken place.
- Norton Lindsey is too remote for walking to destinations such as Warwick and Leamington Spa and due to the road infrastructure cycling is dangerous.
- Parking is a problem with new residential schemes providing insufficient on-site parking causing congestion and safety hazards (30 dwellings could provide an additional 60 vehicles and 80 a minimum of 120 vehicles).
There is no employment in Norton Lindsey to support development. Further the addition of housing will not create any employment. Accordingly development on the scale envisaged runs counter to many of the aspirations as set out in both the Preferred Options document but also the NPPF.
The historic built environment restricts options to improve roads, which would also fundamentally ruin the context and integrity of the buildings.
Development may impact on the conservation areas and the overall historic environment. It is essential need to protect Norton Lindsey' unique heritage for current and future generations and avoid impacting on views and features
Due to environmental considerations and build standards to minimise carbon emissions together with affordable housing contributions, this may mean that such locations as Norton Lindsey are economically unviable to be brought forward for development. Also reference to earlier comments about promoting unsustainable transport.
Agree with the principle of inclusive, safe and healthy communities, but Norton Lindsey is an unsuitable site as it is not within a wide range of facilities.
Standard Response Representation Attached. Text copied below:
Norton Lindsey Village response to Warwick District Council consultation May 2012
New Local Plan Preferred Options
Sheet 1 of 1
Which document are you responding to? Preferred Options (Full Version)
Which part of the document are you responding to? Preferred Option 1 (P01)
Paragraph number I Heading I Subheading (if relevant) - 5.6, 5.10, 5.12, 5.13, 5.15, 5.18,5.22
What is the nature of your representation? OBJECT
Part 1 -Setting the Scene and Summary
P01 - Preferred Level of Growth
OBJECT
It is agreed that some growth will be required during the 2014-2029 period to sustain an
economic and vibrant economy. An increase in homes of appropriate tenures will be
required but the level of growth based on the economic predictions certainly over the
next five years seems excessive especially when viewed against the economic
backdrop. This comment is supported by Office of National Statistics data which reveals
that the rate of increase of Gross Domestic Product has been falling since mid 2010 and
has yet to show signs of recovery. On this basis growth has been downgraded to 0.7%
from 0.8%. Predictions from the respected International Monetary Fund have revised
expectations of growth of 0.8% down to 0.2% with a very modest almost "flat
lining"growth of 0.6% in 2013. Accordingly the base figures being utilised are over
stated.
We believe that the demand for further housing in Norton Lindsey is limited and can be
adequately met by windfall sites and as has been historically the case utilising previously
used land and buildings.
Changes to Preferred Option 1 -adopt a more conservative growth pattern to
reflect market conditions which are likely to prevail over the first half of the Plan
period.
Definitions:
NPPF-National Planning Policy Framework: WOe-Warwick District Council: SOC-Stratford upon Avon District Council
Agent's contact details:
Object
Preferred Options
Representation ID: 51614
Received: 27/07/2012
Respondent: Mark Robins
The proposed level of development is entirely inappropriate and of such a scale (25% increase at 30 homes and 65% increase at 80 homes) that it would cause irreparable harm to the village. It is also disproportionate to the scale and massing of the village and the approach needs to be reconsidered.
Norton Lindsey is uniquely located on the border with SDC and WDC - there are concerns that should SDC decide in their local plan to build up to the Norton Lindsey boundary and WDC wishes to place up to 80 new properties within Norton Lindsey, the cumulative effect would completely decimate the village.
There is a need for an inspector to consider the plans for WDC and SDC together and to take Norton Lindsey out of the immediate process to allow thw above to happen.
There is a statutory requirement for evidence of local housing need to be identified prior to any development being undertaken - the last local housing need survey indicated a need for 3 dwellings in Norton Lindsey - the quota of between 30-80 dwellings would appear to be far and above the local housing need. Norton Lindsey has also benefited from a number of affordable homes schemes over the years and is now well served by affordable housing of various tenures and sizes.
Norton Lindsey does not fulfil the transport criteria to mimimise the need to travel or access to sustainable forms of transport:
- There is no regular public transport
- Main Street is very narrow with many houses abutting the road and a number having accommodation at lower than street level / additional traffic may damage buildings
- The road structures along and leading from the village have bad bends, very narrow sections and no passing places - serious accidents have taken place.
- Norton Lindsey is too remote for walking to destinations such as Warwick and Leamington Spa and due to the road infrastructure cycling is dangerous.
- Parking is a problem with new residential schemes providing insufficient on-site parking causing congestion and safety hazards (30 dwellings could provide an additional 60 vehicles and 80 a minimum of 120 vehicles).
There is no employment in Norton Lindsey to support development. Further the addition of housing will not create any employment. Accordingly development on the scale envisaged runs counter to many of the aspirations as set out in both the Preferred Options document but also the NPPF.
The historic built environment restricts options to improve roads, which would also fundamentally ruin the context and integrity of the buildings.
Development may impact on the conservation areas and the overall historic environment. It is essential need to protect Norton Lindsey' unique heritage for current and future generations and avoid impacting on views and features
Due to environmental considerations and build standards to minimise carbon emissions together with affordable housing contributions, this may mean that such locations as Norton Lindsey are economically unviable to be brought forward for development. Also reference to earlier comments about promoting unsustainable transport.
Agree with the principle of inclusive, safe and healthy communities, but Norton Lindsey is an unsuitable site as it is not within a wide range of facilities.
Standard Response Representation Attached. Text copied below:
Norton Lindsey Village response to Warwick District Council consultation May 2012
New Local Plan Preferred Options
Sheet 1 of 1
Which document are you responding to? Preferred Options (Full Version)
Which part of the document are you responding to? Preferred Option 1 (P01)
Paragraph number I Heading I Subheading (if relevant) - 5.6, 5.10, 5.12, 5.13, 5.15, 5.18,5.22
What is the nature of your representation? OBJECT
Part 1 -Setting the Scene and Summary
P01 - Preferred Level of Growth
OBJECT
It is agreed that some growth will be required during the 2014-2029 period to sustain an
economic and vibrant economy. An increase in homes of appropriate tenures will be
required but the level of growth based on the economic predictions certainly over the
next five years seems excessive especially when viewed against the economic
backdrop. This comment is supported by Office of National Statistics data which reveals
that the rate of increase of Gross Domestic Product has been falling since mid 2010 and
has yet to show signs of recovery. On this basis growth has been downgraded to 0.7%
from 0.8%. Predictions from the respected International Monetary Fund have revised
expectations of growth of 0.8% down to 0.2% with a very modest almost "flat
lining"growth of 0.6% in 2013. Accordingly the base figures being utilised are over
stated.
We believe that the demand for further housing in Norton Lindsey is limited and can be
adequately met by windfall sites and as has been historically the case utilising previously
used land and buildings.
Changes to Preferred Option 1 -adopt a more conservative growth pattern to
reflect market conditions which are likely to prevail over the first half of the Plan
period.
Definitions:
NPPF-National Planning Policy Framework: WOe-Warwick District Council: SOC-Stratford upon Avon District Council
Agent's contact details:
Object
Preferred Options
Representation ID: 51624
Received: 27/07/2012
Respondent: Sara Dixon
The proposed level of development is entirely inappropriate and of such a scale (25% increase at 30 homes and 65% increase at 80 homes) that it would cause irreparable harm to the village. It is also disproportionate to the scale and massing of the village and the approach needs to be reconsidered.
Norton Lindsey is uniquely located on the border with SDC and WDC - there are concerns that should SDC decide in their local plan to build up to the Norton Lindsey boundary and WDC wishes to place up to 80 new properties within Norton Lindsey, the cumulative effect would completely decimate the village.
There is a need for an inspector to consider the plans for WDC and SDC together and to take Norton Lindsey out of the immediate process to allow thw above to happen.
There is a statutory requirement for evidence of local housing need to be identified prior to any development being undertaken - the last local housing need survey indicated a need for 3 dwellings in Norton Lindsey - the quota of between 30-80 dwellings would appear to be far and above the local housing need. Norton Lindsey has also benefited from a number of affordable homes schemes over the years and is now well served by affordable housing of various tenures and sizes.
Norton Lindsey does not fulfil the transport criteria to mimimise the need to travel or access to sustainable forms of transport:
- There is no regular public transport
- Main Street is very narrow with many houses abutting the road and a number having accommodation at lower than street level / additional traffic may damage buildings
- The road structures along and leading from the village have bad bends, very narrow sections and no passing places - serious accidents have taken place.
- Norton Lindsey is too remote for walking to destinations such as Warwick and Leamington Spa and due to the road infrastructure cycling is dangerous.
- Parking is a problem with new residential schemes providing insufficient on-site parking causing congestion and safety hazards (30 dwellings could provide an additional 60 vehicles and 80 a minimum of 120 vehicles).
There is no employment in Norton Lindsey to support development. Further the addition of housing will not create any employment. Accordingly development on the scale envisaged runs counter to many of the aspirations as set out in both the Preferred Options document but also the NPPF.
The historic built environment restricts options to improve roads, which would also fundamentally ruin the context and integrity of the buildings.
Development may impact on the conservation areas and the overall historic environment. It is essential need to protect Norton Lindsey' unique heritage for current and future generations and avoid impacting on views and features
Due to environmental considerations and build standards to minimise carbon emissions together with affordable housing contributions, this may mean that such locations as Norton Lindsey are economically unviable to be brought forward for development. Also reference to earlier comments about promoting unsustainable transport.
Agree with the principle of inclusive, safe and healthy communities, but Norton Lindsey is an unsuitable site as it is not within a wide range of facilities.
Standard Response Representation Attached. Text copied below:
Norton Lindsey Village response to Warwick District Council consultation May 2012
New Local Plan Preferred Options
Sheet 1 of 1
Which document are you responding to? Preferred Options (Full Version)
Which part of the document are you responding to? Preferred Option 1 (P01)
Paragraph number I Heading I Subheading (if relevant) - 5.6, 5.10, 5.12, 5.13, 5.15, 5.18,5.22
What is the nature of your representation? OBJECT
Part 1 -Setting the Scene and Summary
P01 - Preferred Level of Growth
OBJECT
It is agreed that some growth will be required during the 2014-2029 period to sustain an
economic and vibrant economy. An increase in homes of appropriate tenures will be
required but the level of growth based on the economic predictions certainly over the
next five years seems excessive especially when viewed against the economic
backdrop. This comment is supported by Office of National Statistics data which reveals
that the rate of increase of Gross Domestic Product has been falling since mid 2010 and
has yet to show signs of recovery. On this basis growth has been downgraded to 0.7%
from 0.8%. Predictions from the respected International Monetary Fund have revised
expectations of growth of 0.8% down to 0.2% with a very modest almost "flat
lining"growth of 0.6% in 2013. Accordingly the base figures being utilised are over
stated.
We believe that the demand for further housing in Norton Lindsey is limited and can be
adequately met by windfall sites and as has been historically the case utilising previously
used land and buildings.
Changes to Preferred Option 1 -adopt a more conservative growth pattern to
reflect market conditions which are likely to prevail over the first half of the Plan
period.
Definitions:
NPPF-National Planning Policy Framework: WOe-Warwick District Council: SOC-Stratford upon Avon District Council
Agent's contact details:
Object
Preferred Options
Representation ID: 51634
Received: 27/07/2012
Respondent: James Toogood
The proposed level of development is entirely inappropriate and of such a scale (25% increase at 30 homes and 65% increase at 80 homes) that it would cause irreparable harm to the village. It is also disproportionate to the scale and massing of the village and the approach needs to be reconsidered.
Norton Lindsey is uniquely located on the border with SDC and WDC - there are concerns that should SDC decide in their local plan to build up to the Norton Lindsey boundary and WDC wishes to place up to 80 new properties within Norton Lindsey, the cumulative effect would completely decimate the village.
There is a need for an inspector to consider the plans for WDC and SDC together and to take Norton Lindsey out of the immediate process to allow thw above to happen.
There is a statutory requirement for evidence of local housing need to be identified prior to any development being undertaken - the last local housing need survey indicated a need for 3 dwellings in Norton Lindsey - the quota of between 30-80 dwellings would appear to be far and above the local housing need. Norton Lindsey has also benefited from a number of affordable homes schemes over the years and is now well served by affordable housing of various tenures and sizes.
Norton Lindsey does not fulfil the transport criteria to mimimise the need to travel or access to sustainable forms of transport:
- There is no regular public transport
- Main Street is very narrow with many houses abutting the road and a number having accommodation at lower than street level / additional traffic may damage buildings
- The road structures along and leading from the village have bad bends, very narrow sections and no passing places - serious accidents have taken place.
- Norton Lindsey is too remote for walking to destinations such as Warwick and Leamington Spa and due to the road infrastructure cycling is dangerous.
- Parking is a problem with new residential schemes providing insufficient on-site parking causing congestion and safety hazards (30 dwellings could provide an additional 60 vehicles and 80 a minimum of 120 vehicles).
There is no employment in Norton Lindsey to support development. Further the addition of housing will not create any employment. Accordingly development on the scale envisaged runs counter to many of the aspirations as set out in both the Preferred Options document but also the NPPF.
The historic built environment restricts options to improve roads, which would also fundamentally ruin the context and integrity of the buildings.
Development may impact on the conservation areas and the overall historic environment. It is essential need to protect Norton Lindsey' unique heritage for current and future generations and avoid impacting on views and features
Due to environmental considerations and build standards to minimise carbon emissions together with affordable housing contributions, this may mean that such locations as Norton Lindsey are economically unviable to be brought forward for development. Also reference to earlier comments about promoting unsustainable transport.
Agree with the principle of inclusive, safe and healthy communities, but Norton Lindsey is an unsuitable site as it is not within a wide range of facilities.
Standard Response Representation Attached. Text copied below:
Norton Lindsey Village response to Warwick District Council consultation May 2012
New Local Plan Preferred Options
Sheet 1 of 1
Which document are you responding to? Preferred Options (Full Version)
Which part of the document are you responding to? Preferred Option 1 (P01)
Paragraph number I Heading I Subheading (if relevant) - 5.6, 5.10, 5.12, 5.13, 5.15, 5.18,5.22
What is the nature of your representation? OBJECT
Part 1 -Setting the Scene and Summary
P01 - Preferred Level of Growth
OBJECT
It is agreed that some growth will be required during the 2014-2029 period to sustain an
economic and vibrant economy. An increase in homes of appropriate tenures will be
required but the level of growth based on the economic predictions certainly over the
next five years seems excessive especially when viewed against the economic
backdrop. This comment is supported by Office of National Statistics data which reveals
that the rate of increase of Gross Domestic Product has been falling since mid 2010 and
has yet to show signs of recovery. On this basis growth has been downgraded to 0.7%
from 0.8%. Predictions from the respected International Monetary Fund have revised
expectations of growth of 0.8% down to 0.2% with a very modest almost "flat
lining"growth of 0.6% in 2013. Accordingly the base figures being utilised are over
stated.
We believe that the demand for further housing in Norton Lindsey is limited and can be
adequately met by windfall sites and as has been historically the case utilising previously
used land and buildings.
Changes to Preferred Option 1 -adopt a more conservative growth pattern to
reflect market conditions which are likely to prevail over the first half of the Plan
period.
Definitions:
NPPF-National Planning Policy Framework: WOe-Warwick District Council: SOC-Stratford upon Avon District Council
Agent's contact details:
Object
Preferred Options
Representation ID: 51644
Received: 27/07/2012
Respondent: Mr Hugh Roberts
The proposed level of development is entirely inappropriate and of such a scale (25% increase at 30 homes and 65% increase at 80 homes) that it would cause irreparable harm to the village. It is also disproportionate to the scale and massing of the village and the approach needs to be reconsidered.
Norton Lindsey is uniquely located on the border with SDC and WDC - there are concerns that should SDC decide in their local plan to build up to the Norton Lindsey boundary and WDC wishes to place up to 80 new properties within Norton Lindsey, the cumulative effect would completely decimate the village.
There is a need for an inspector to consider the plans for WDC and SDC together and to take Norton Lindsey out of the immediate process to allow thw above to happen.
There is a statutory requirement for evidence of local housing need to be identified prior to any development being undertaken - the last local housing need survey indicated a need for 3 dwellings in Norton Lindsey - the quota of between 30-80 dwellings would appear to be far and above the local housing need. Norton Lindsey has also benefited from a number of affordable homes schemes over the years and is now well served by affordable housing of various tenures and sizes.
Norton Lindsey does not fulfil the transport criteria to mimimise the need to travel or access to sustainable forms of transport:
- There is no regular public transport
- Main Street is very narrow with many houses abutting the road and a number having accommodation at lower than street level / additional traffic may damage buildings
- The road structures along and leading from the village have bad bends, very narrow sections and no passing places - serious accidents have taken place.
- Norton Lindsey is too remote for walking to destinations such as Warwick and Leamington Spa and due to the road infrastructure cycling is dangerous.
- Parking is a problem with new residential schemes providing insufficient on-site parking causing congestion and safety hazards (30 dwellings could provide an additional 60 vehicles and 80 a minimum of 120 vehicles).
There is no employment in Norton Lindsey to support development. Further the addition of housing will not create any employment. Accordingly development on the scale envisaged runs counter to many of the aspirations as set out in both the Preferred Options document but also the NPPF.
The historic built environment restricts options to improve roads, which would also fundamentally ruin the context and integrity of the buildings.
Development may impact on the conservation areas and the overall historic environment. It is essential need to protect Norton Lindsey' unique heritage for current and future generations and avoid impacting on views and features
Due to environmental considerations and build standards to minimise carbon emissions together with affordable housing contributions, this may mean that such locations as Norton Lindsey are economically unviable to be brought forward for development. Also reference to earlier comments about promoting unsustainable transport.
Agree with the principle of inclusive, safe and healthy communities, but Norton Lindsey is an unsuitable site as it is not within a wide range of facilities.
Standard Response Representation Attached. Text copied below:
Norton Lindsey Village response to Warwick District Council consultation May 2012
New Local Plan Preferred Options
Sheet 1 of 1
Which document are you responding to? Preferred Options (Full Version)
Which part of the document are you responding to? Preferred Option 1 (P01)
Paragraph number I Heading I Subheading (if relevant) - 5.6, 5.10, 5.12, 5.13, 5.15, 5.18,5.22
What is the nature of your representation? OBJECT
Part 1 -Setting the Scene and Summary
P01 - Preferred Level of Growth
OBJECT
It is agreed that some growth will be required during the 2014-2029 period to sustain an
economic and vibrant economy. An increase in homes of appropriate tenures will be
required but the level of growth based on the economic predictions certainly over the
next five years seems excessive especially when viewed against the economic
backdrop. This comment is supported by Office of National Statistics data which reveals
that the rate of increase of Gross Domestic Product has been falling since mid 2010 and
has yet to show signs of recovery. On this basis growth has been downgraded to 0.7%
from 0.8%. Predictions from the respected International Monetary Fund have revised
expectations of growth of 0.8% down to 0.2% with a very modest almost "flat
lining"growth of 0.6% in 2013. Accordingly the base figures being utilised are over
stated.
We believe that the demand for further housing in Norton Lindsey is limited and can be
adequately met by windfall sites and as has been historically the case utilising previously
used land and buildings.
Changes to Preferred Option 1 -adopt a more conservative growth pattern to
reflect market conditions which are likely to prevail over the first half of the Plan
period.
Definitions:
NPPF-National Planning Policy Framework: WOe-Warwick District Council: SOC-Stratford upon Avon District Council
Agent's contact details:
Object
Preferred Options
Representation ID: 51654
Received: 27/07/2012
Respondent: Mrs Kelly Dix
The proposed level of development is entirely inappropriate and of such a scale (25% increase at 30 homes and 65% increase at 80 homes) that it would cause irreparable harm to the village. It is also disproportionate to the scale and massing of the village and the approach needs to be reconsidered.
Norton Lindsey is uniquely located on the border with SDC and WDC - there are concerns that should SDC decide in their local plan to build up to the Norton Lindsey boundary and WDC wishes to place up to 80 new properties within Norton Lindsey, the cumulative effect would completely decimate the village.
There is a need for an inspector to consider the plans for WDC and SDC together and to take Norton Lindsey out of the immediate process to allow thw above to happen.
There is a statutory requirement for evidence of local housing need to be identified prior to any development being undertaken - the last local housing need survey indicated a need for 3 dwellings in Norton Lindsey - the quota of between 30-80 dwellings would appear to be far and above the local housing need. Norton Lindsey has also benefited from a number of affordable homes schemes over the years and is now well served by affordable housing of various tenures and sizes.
Norton Lindsey does not fulfil the transport criteria to mimimise the need to travel or access to sustainable forms of transport:
- There is no regular public transport
- Main Street is very narrow with many houses abutting the road and a number having accommodation at lower than street level / additional traffic may damage buildings
- The road structures along and leading from the village have bad bends, very narrow sections and no passing places - serious accidents have taken place.
- Norton Lindsey is too remote for walking to destinations such as Warwick and Leamington Spa and due to the road infrastructure cycling is dangerous.
- Parking is a problem with new residential schemes providing insufficient on-site parking causing congestion and safety hazards (30 dwellings could provide an additional 60 vehicles and 80 a minimum of 120 vehicles).
There is no employment in Norton Lindsey to support development. Further the addition of housing will not create any employment. Accordingly development on the scale envisaged runs counter to many of the aspirations as set out in both the Preferred Options document but also the NPPF.
The historic built environment restricts options to improve roads, which would also fundamentally ruin the context and integrity of the buildings.
Development may impact on the conservation areas and the overall historic environment. It is essential need to protect Norton Lindsey' unique heritage for current and future generations and avoid impacting on views and features
Due to environmental considerations and build standards to minimise carbon emissions together with affordable housing contributions, this may mean that such locations as Norton Lindsey are economically unviable to be brought forward for development. Also reference to earlier comments about promoting unsustainable transport.
Agree with the principle of inclusive, safe and healthy communities, but Norton Lindsey is an unsuitable site as it is not within a wide range of facilities.
Standard Response Representation Attached. Text copied below:
Norton Lindsey Village response to Warwick District Council consultation May 2012
New Local Plan Preferred Options
Sheet 1 of 1
Which document are you responding to? Preferred Options (Full Version)
Which part of the document are you responding to? Preferred Option 1 (P01)
Paragraph number I Heading I Subheading (if relevant) - 5.6, 5.10, 5.12, 5.13, 5.15, 5.18,5.22
What is the nature of your representation? OBJECT
Part 1 -Setting the Scene and Summary
P01 - Preferred Level of Growth
OBJECT
It is agreed that some growth will be required during the 2014-2029 period to sustain an
economic and vibrant economy. An increase in homes of appropriate tenures will be
required but the level of growth based on the economic predictions certainly over the
next five years seems excessive especially when viewed against the economic
backdrop. This comment is supported by Office of National Statistics data which reveals
that the rate of increase of Gross Domestic Product has been falling since mid 2010 and
has yet to show signs of recovery. On this basis growth has been downgraded to 0.7%
from 0.8%. Predictions from the respected International Monetary Fund have revised
expectations of growth of 0.8% down to 0.2% with a very modest almost "flat
lining"growth of 0.6% in 2013. Accordingly the base figures being utilised are over
stated.
We believe that the demand for further housing in Norton Lindsey is limited and can be
adequately met by windfall sites and as has been historically the case utilising previously
used land and buildings.
Changes to Preferred Option 1 -adopt a more conservative growth pattern to
reflect market conditions which are likely to prevail over the first half of the Plan
period.
Definitions:
NPPF-National Planning Policy Framework: WOe-Warwick District Council: SOC-Stratford upon Avon District Council
Agent's contact details:
Object
Preferred Options
Representation ID: 51664
Received: 27/07/2012
Respondent: Louise Clarke
The proposed level of development is entirely inappropriate and of such a scale (25% increase at 30 homes and 65% increase at 80 homes) that it would cause irreparable harm to the village. It is also disproportionate to the scale and massing of the village and the approach needs to be reconsidered.
Norton Lindsey is uniquely located on the border with SDC and WDC - there are concerns that should SDC decide in their local plan to build up to the Norton Lindsey boundary and WDC wishes to place up to 80 new properties within Norton Lindsey, the cumulative effect would completely decimate the village.
There is a need for an inspector to consider the plans for WDC and SDC together and to take Norton Lindsey out of the immediate process to allow thw above to happen.
There is a statutory requirement for evidence of local housing need to be identified prior to any development being undertaken - the last local housing need survey indicated a need for 3 dwellings in Norton Lindsey - the quota of between 30-80 dwellings would appear to be far and above the local housing need. Norton Lindsey has also benefited from a number of affordable homes schemes over the years and is now well served by affordable housing of various tenures and sizes.
Norton Lindsey does not fulfil the transport criteria to mimimise the need to travel or access to sustainable forms of transport:
- There is no regular public transport
- Main Street is very narrow with many houses abutting the road and a number having accommodation at lower than street level / additional traffic may damage buildings
- The road structures along and leading from the village have bad bends, very narrow sections and no passing places - serious accidents have taken place.
- Norton Lindsey is too remote for walking to destinations such as Warwick and Leamington Spa and due to the road infrastructure cycling is dangerous.
- Parking is a problem with new residential schemes providing insufficient on-site parking causing congestion and safety hazards (30 dwellings could provide an additional 60 vehicles and 80 a minimum of 120 vehicles).
There is no employment in Norton Lindsey to support development. Further the addition of housing will not create any employment. Accordingly development on the scale envisaged runs counter to many of the aspirations as set out in both the Preferred Options document but also the NPPF.
The historic built environment restricts options to improve roads, which would also fundamentally ruin the context and integrity of the buildings.
Development may impact on the conservation areas and the overall historic environment. It is essential need to protect Norton Lindsey' unique heritage for current and future generations and avoid impacting on views and features
Due to environmental considerations and build standards to minimise carbon emissions together with affordable housing contributions, this may mean that such locations as Norton Lindsey are economically unviable to be brought forward for development. Also reference to earlier comments about promoting unsustainable transport.
Agree with the principle of inclusive, safe and healthy communities, but Norton Lindsey is an unsuitable site as it is not within a wide range of facilities.
Standard Response Representation Attached. Text copied below:
Norton Lindsey Village response to Warwick District Council consultation May 2012
New Local Plan Preferred Options
Sheet 1 of 1
Which document are you responding to? Preferred Options (Full Version)
Which part of the document are you responding to? Preferred Option 1 (P01)
Paragraph number I Heading I Subheading (if relevant) - 5.6, 5.10, 5.12, 5.13, 5.15, 5.18,5.22
What is the nature of your representation? OBJECT
Part 1 -Setting the Scene and Summary
P01 - Preferred Level of Growth
OBJECT
It is agreed that some growth will be required during the 2014-2029 period to sustain an
economic and vibrant economy. An increase in homes of appropriate tenures will be
required but the level of growth based on the economic predictions certainly over the
next five years seems excessive especially when viewed against the economic
backdrop. This comment is supported by Office of National Statistics data which reveals
that the rate of increase of Gross Domestic Product has been falling since mid 2010 and
has yet to show signs of recovery. On this basis growth has been downgraded to 0.7%
from 0.8%. Predictions from the respected International Monetary Fund have revised
expectations of growth of 0.8% down to 0.2% with a very modest almost "flat
lining"growth of 0.6% in 2013. Accordingly the base figures being utilised are over
stated.
We believe that the demand for further housing in Norton Lindsey is limited and can be
adequately met by windfall sites and as has been historically the case utilising previously
used land and buildings.
Changes to Preferred Option 1 -adopt a more conservative growth pattern to
reflect market conditions which are likely to prevail over the first half of the Plan
period.
Definitions:
NPPF-National Planning Policy Framework: WOe-Warwick District Council: SOC-Stratford upon Avon District Council
Agent's contact details:
Object
Preferred Options
Representation ID: 51674
Received: 27/07/2012
Respondent: Barrie Corless
The proposed level of development is entirely inappropriate and of such a scale (25% increase at 30 homes and 65% increase at 80 homes) that it would cause irreparable harm to the village. It is also disproportionate to the scale and massing of the village and the approach needs to be reconsidered.
Norton Lindsey is uniquely located on the border with SDC and WDC - there are concerns that should SDC decide in their local plan to build up to the Norton Lindsey boundary and WDC wishes to place up to 80 new properties within Norton Lindsey, the cumulative effect would completely decimate the village.
There is a need for an inspector to consider the plans for WDC and SDC together and to take Norton Lindsey out of the immediate process to allow thw above to happen.
There is a statutory requirement for evidence of local housing need to be identified prior to any development being undertaken - the last local housing need survey indicated a need for 3 dwellings in Norton Lindsey - the quota of between 30-80 dwellings would appear to be far and above the local housing need. Norton Lindsey has also benefited from a number of affordable homes schemes over the years and is now well served by affordable housing of various tenures and sizes.
Norton Lindsey does not fulfil the transport criteria to mimimise the need to travel or access to sustainable forms of transport:
- There is no regular public transport
- Main Street is very narrow with many houses abutting the road and a number having accommodation at lower than street level / additional traffic may damage buildings
- The road structures along and leading from the village have bad bends, very narrow sections and no passing places - serious accidents have taken place.
- Norton Lindsey is too remote for walking to destinations such as Warwick and Leamington Spa and due to the road infrastructure cycling is dangerous.
- Parking is a problem with new residential schemes providing insufficient on-site parking causing congestion and safety hazards (30 dwellings could provide an additional 60 vehicles and 80 a minimum of 120 vehicles).
There is no employment in Norton Lindsey to support development. Further the addition of housing will not create any employment. Accordingly development on the scale envisaged runs counter to many of the aspirations as set out in both the Preferred Options document but also the NPPF.
The historic built environment restricts options to improve roads, which would also fundamentally ruin the context and integrity of the buildings.
Development may impact on the conservation areas and the overall historic environment. It is essential need to protect Norton Lindsey' unique heritage for current and future generations and avoid impacting on views and features
Due to environmental considerations and build standards to minimise carbon emissions together with affordable housing contributions, this may mean that such locations as Norton Lindsey are economically unviable to be brought forward for development. Also reference to earlier comments about promoting unsustainable transport.
Agree with the principle of inclusive, safe and healthy communities, but Norton Lindsey is an unsuitable site as it is not within a wide range of facilities.
Standard Response Representation Attached. Text copied below:
Norton Lindsey Village response to Warwick District Council consultation May 2012
New Local Plan Preferred Options
Sheet 1 of 1
Which document are you responding to? Preferred Options (Full Version)
Which part of the document are you responding to? Preferred Option 1 (P01)
Paragraph number I Heading I Subheading (if relevant) - 5.6, 5.10, 5.12, 5.13, 5.15, 5.18,5.22
What is the nature of your representation? OBJECT
Part 1 -Setting the Scene and Summary
P01 - Preferred Level of Growth
OBJECT
It is agreed that some growth will be required during the 2014-2029 period to sustain an
economic and vibrant economy. An increase in homes of appropriate tenures will be
required but the level of growth based on the economic predictions certainly over the
next five years seems excessive especially when viewed against the economic
backdrop. This comment is supported by Office of National Statistics data which reveals
that the rate of increase of Gross Domestic Product has been falling since mid 2010 and
has yet to show signs of recovery. On this basis growth has been downgraded to 0.7%
from 0.8%. Predictions from the respected International Monetary Fund have revised
expectations of growth of 0.8% down to 0.2% with a very modest almost "flat
lining"growth of 0.6% in 2013. Accordingly the base figures being utilised are over
stated.
We believe that the demand for further housing in Norton Lindsey is limited and can be
adequately met by windfall sites and as has been historically the case utilising previously
used land and buildings.
Changes to Preferred Option 1 -adopt a more conservative growth pattern to
reflect market conditions which are likely to prevail over the first half of the Plan
period.
Definitions:
NPPF-National Planning Policy Framework: WOe-Warwick District Council: SOC-Stratford upon Avon District Council
Agent's contact details:
Object
Preferred Options
Representation ID: 51684
Received: 27/07/2012
Respondent: David Woolley
The proposed level of development is entirely inappropriate and of such a scale (25% increase at 30 homes and 65% increase at 80 homes) that it would cause irreparable harm to the village. It is also disproportionate to the scale and massing of the village and the approach needs to be reconsidered.
Norton Lindsey is uniquely located on the border with SDC and WDC - there are concerns that should SDC decide in their local plan to build up to the Norton Lindsey boundary and WDC wishes to place up to 80 new properties within Norton Lindsey, the cumulative effect would completely decimate the village.
There is a need for an inspector to consider the plans for WDC and SDC together and to take Norton Lindsey out of the immediate process to allow thw above to happen.
There is a statutory requirement for evidence of local housing need to be identified prior to any development being undertaken - the last local housing need survey indicated a need for 3 dwellings in Norton Lindsey - the quota of between 30-80 dwellings would appear to be far and above the local housing need. Norton Lindsey has also benefited from a number of affordable homes schemes over the years and is now well served by affordable housing of various tenures and sizes.
Norton Lindsey does not fulfil the transport criteria to mimimise the need to travel or access to sustainable forms of transport:
- There is no regular public transport
- Main Street is very narrow with many houses abutting the road and a number having accommodation at lower than street level / additional traffic may damage buildings
- The road structures along and leading from the village have bad bends, very narrow sections and no passing places - serious accidents have taken place.
- Norton Lindsey is too remote for walking to destinations such as Warwick and Leamington Spa and due to the road infrastructure cycling is dangerous.
- Parking is a problem with new residential schemes providing insufficient on-site parking causing congestion and safety hazards (30 dwellings could provide an additional 60 vehicles and 80 a minimum of 120 vehicles).
There is no employment in Norton Lindsey to support development. Further the addition of housing will not create any employment. Accordingly development on the scale envisaged runs counter to many of the aspirations as set out in both the Preferred Options document but also the NPPF.
The historic built environment restricts options to improve roads, which would also fundamentally ruin the context and integrity of the buildings.
Development may impact on the conservation areas and the overall historic environment. It is essential need to protect Norton Lindsey' unique heritage for current and future generations and avoid impacting on views and features
Due to environmental considerations and build standards to minimise carbon emissions together with affordable housing contributions, this may mean that such locations as Norton Lindsey are economically unviable to be brought forward for development. Also reference to earlier comments about promoting unsustainable transport.
Agree with the principle of inclusive, safe and healthy communities, but Norton Lindsey is an unsuitable site as it is not within a wide range of facilities.
Standard Response Representation Attached. Text copied below:
Norton Lindsey Village response to Warwick District Council consultation May 2012
New Local Plan Preferred Options
Sheet 1 of 1
Which document are you responding to? Preferred Options (Full Version)
Which part of the document are you responding to? Preferred Option 1 (P01)
Paragraph number I Heading I Subheading (if relevant) - 5.6, 5.10, 5.12, 5.13, 5.15, 5.18,5.22
What is the nature of your representation? OBJECT
Part 1 -Setting the Scene and Summary
P01 - Preferred Level of Growth
OBJECT
It is agreed that some growth will be required during the 2014-2029 period to sustain an
economic and vibrant economy. An increase in homes of appropriate tenures will be
required but the level of growth based on the economic predictions certainly over the
next five years seems excessive especially when viewed against the economic
backdrop. This comment is supported by Office of National Statistics data which reveals
that the rate of increase of Gross Domestic Product has been falling since mid 2010 and
has yet to show signs of recovery. On this basis growth has been downgraded to 0.7%
from 0.8%. Predictions from the respected International Monetary Fund have revised
expectations of growth of 0.8% down to 0.2% with a very modest almost "flat
lining"growth of 0.6% in 2013. Accordingly the base figures being utilised are over
stated.
We believe that the demand for further housing in Norton Lindsey is limited and can be
adequately met by windfall sites and as has been historically the case utilising previously
used land and buildings.
Changes to Preferred Option 1 -adopt a more conservative growth pattern to
reflect market conditions which are likely to prevail over the first half of the Plan
period.
Definitions:
NPPF-National Planning Policy Framework: WOe-Warwick District Council: SOC-Stratford upon Avon District Council
Agent's contact details:
Object
Preferred Options
Representation ID: 51694
Received: 27/07/2012
Respondent: Colin Wilcox
The proposed level of development is entirely inappropriate and of such a scale (25% increase at 30 homes and 65% increase at 80 homes) that it would cause irreparable harm to the village. It is also disproportionate to the scale and massing of the village and the approach needs to be reconsidered.
Norton Lindsey is uniquely located on the border with SDC and WDC - there are concerns that should SDC decide in their local plan to build up to the Norton Lindsey boundary and WDC wishes to place up to 80 new properties within Norton Lindsey, the cumulative effect would completely decimate the village.
There is a need for an inspector to consider the plans for WDC and SDC together and to take Norton Lindsey out of the immediate process to allow thw above to happen.
There is a statutory requirement for evidence of local housing need to be identified prior to any development being undertaken - the last local housing need survey indicated a need for 3 dwellings in Norton Lindsey - the quota of between 30-80 dwellings would appear to be far and above the local housing need. Norton Lindsey has also benefited from a number of affordable homes schemes over the years and is now well served by affordable housing of various tenures and sizes.
Norton Lindsey does not fulfil the transport criteria to mimimise the need to travel or access to sustainable forms of transport:
- There is no regular public transport
- Main Street is very narrow with many houses abutting the road and a number having accommodation at lower than street level / additional traffic may damage buildings
- The road structures along and leading from the village have bad bends, very narrow sections and no passing places - serious accidents have taken place.
- Norton Lindsey is too remote for walking to destinations such as Warwick and Leamington Spa and due to the road infrastructure cycling is dangerous.
- Parking is a problem with new residential schemes providing insufficient on-site parking causing congestion and safety hazards (30 dwellings could provide an additional 60 vehicles and 80 a minimum of 120 vehicles).
There is no employment in Norton Lindsey to support development. Further the addition of housing will not create any employment. Accordingly development on the scale envisaged runs counter to many of the aspirations as set out in both the Preferred Options document but also the NPPF.
The historic built environment restricts options to improve roads, which would also fundamentally ruin the context and integrity of the buildings.
Development may impact on the conservation areas and the overall historic environment. It is essential need to protect Norton Lindsey' unique heritage for current and future generations and avoid impacting on views and features
Due to environmental considerations and build standards to minimise carbon emissions together with affordable housing contributions, this may mean that such locations as Norton Lindsey are economically unviable to be brought forward for development. Also reference to earlier comments about promoting unsustainable transport.
Agree with the principle of inclusive, safe and healthy communities, but Norton Lindsey is an unsuitable site as it is not within a wide range of facilities.
Standard Response Representation Attached. Text copied below:
Norton Lindsey Village response to Warwick District Council consultation May 2012
New Local Plan Preferred Options
Sheet 1 of 1
Which document are you responding to? Preferred Options (Full Version)
Which part of the document are you responding to? Preferred Option 1 (P01)
Paragraph number I Heading I Subheading (if relevant) - 5.6, 5.10, 5.12, 5.13, 5.15, 5.18,5.22
What is the nature of your representation? OBJECT
Part 1 -Setting the Scene and Summary
P01 - Preferred Level of Growth
OBJECT
It is agreed that some growth will be required during the 2014-2029 period to sustain an
economic and vibrant economy. An increase in homes of appropriate tenures will be
required but the level of growth based on the economic predictions certainly over the
next five years seems excessive especially when viewed against the economic
backdrop. This comment is supported by Office of National Statistics data which reveals
that the rate of increase of Gross Domestic Product has been falling since mid 2010 and
has yet to show signs of recovery. On this basis growth has been downgraded to 0.7%
from 0.8%. Predictions from the respected International Monetary Fund have revised
expectations of growth of 0.8% down to 0.2% with a very modest almost "flat
lining"growth of 0.6% in 2013. Accordingly the base figures being utilised are over
stated.
We believe that the demand for further housing in Norton Lindsey is limited and can be
adequately met by windfall sites and as has been historically the case utilising previously
used land and buildings.
Changes to Preferred Option 1 -adopt a more conservative growth pattern to
reflect market conditions which are likely to prevail over the first half of the Plan
period.
Definitions:
NPPF-National Planning Policy Framework: WOe-Warwick District Council: SOC-Stratford upon Avon District Council
Agent's contact details:
Object
Preferred Options
Representation ID: 51704
Received: 27/07/2012
Respondent: Sue Wilcox
The proposed level of development is entirely inappropriate and of such a scale (25% increase at 30 homes and 65% increase at 80 homes) that it would cause irreparable harm to the village. It is also disproportionate to the scale and massing of the village and the approach needs to be reconsidered.
Norton Lindsey is uniquely located on the border with SDC and WDC - there are concerns that should SDC decide in their local plan to build up to the Norton Lindsey boundary and WDC wishes to place up to 80 new properties within Norton Lindsey, the cumulative effect would completely decimate the village.
There is a need for an inspector to consider the plans for WDC and SDC together and to take Norton Lindsey out of the immediate process to allow thw above to happen.
There is a statutory requirement for evidence of local housing need to be identified prior to any development being undertaken - the last local housing need survey indicated a need for 3 dwellings in Norton Lindsey - the quota of between 30-80 dwellings would appear to be far and above the local housing need. Norton Lindsey has also benefited from a number of affordable homes schemes over the years and is now well served by affordable housing of various tenures and sizes.
Norton Lindsey does not fulfil the transport criteria to mimimise the need to travel or access to sustainable forms of transport:
- There is no regular public transport
- Main Street is very narrow with many houses abutting the road and a number having accommodation at lower than street level / additional traffic may damage buildings
- The road structures along and leading from the village have bad bends, very narrow sections and no passing places - serious accidents have taken place.
- Norton Lindsey is too remote for walking to destinations such as Warwick and Leamington Spa and due to the road infrastructure cycling is dangerous.
- Parking is a problem with new residential schemes providing insufficient on-site parking causing congestion and safety hazards (30 dwellings could provide an additional 60 vehicles and 80 a minimum of 120 vehicles).
There is no employment in Norton Lindsey to support development. Further the addition of housing will not create any employment. Accordingly development on the scale envisaged runs counter to many of the aspirations as set out in both the Preferred Options document but also the NPPF.
The historic built environment restricts options to improve roads, which would also fundamentally ruin the context and integrity of the buildings.
Development may impact on the conservation areas and the overall historic environment. It is essential need to protect Norton Lindsey' unique heritage for current and future generations and avoid impacting on views and features
Due to environmental considerations and build standards to minimise carbon emissions together with affordable housing contributions, this may mean that such locations as Norton Lindsey are economically unviable to be brought forward for development. Also reference to earlier comments about promoting unsustainable transport.
Agree with the principle of inclusive, safe and healthy communities, but Norton Lindsey is an unsuitable site as it is not within a wide range of facilities.
Standard Response Representation Attached. Text copied below:
Norton Lindsey Village response to Warwick District Council consultation May 2012
New Local Plan Preferred Options
Sheet 1 of 1
Which document are you responding to? Preferred Options (Full Version)
Which part of the document are you responding to? Preferred Option 1 (P01)
Paragraph number I Heading I Subheading (if relevant) - 5.6, 5.10, 5.12, 5.13, 5.15, 5.18,5.22
What is the nature of your representation? OBJECT
Part 1 -Setting the Scene and Summary
P01 - Preferred Level of Growth
OBJECT
It is agreed that some growth will be required during the 2014-2029 period to sustain an
economic and vibrant economy. An increase in homes of appropriate tenures will be
required but the level of growth based on the economic predictions certainly over the
next five years seems excessive especially when viewed against the economic
backdrop. This comment is supported by Office of National Statistics data which reveals
that the rate of increase of Gross Domestic Product has been falling since mid 2010 and
has yet to show signs of recovery. On this basis growth has been downgraded to 0.7%
from 0.8%. Predictions from the respected International Monetary Fund have revised
expectations of growth of 0.8% down to 0.2% with a very modest almost "flat
lining"growth of 0.6% in 2013. Accordingly the base figures being utilised are over
stated.
We believe that the demand for further housing in Norton Lindsey is limited and can be
adequately met by windfall sites and as has been historically the case utilising previously
used land and buildings.
Changes to Preferred Option 1 -adopt a more conservative growth pattern to
reflect market conditions which are likely to prevail over the first half of the Plan
period.
Definitions:
NPPF-National Planning Policy Framework: WOe-Warwick District Council: SOC-Stratford upon Avon District Council
Agent's contact details:
Object
Preferred Options
Representation ID: 51714
Received: 27/07/2012
Respondent: Chris Kenny
The proposed level of development is entirely inappropriate and of such a scale (25% increase at 30 homes and 65% increase at 80 homes) that it would cause irreparable harm to the village. It is also disproportionate to the scale and massing of the village and the approach needs to be reconsidered.
Norton Lindsey is uniquely located on the border with SDC and WDC - there are concerns that should SDC decide in their local plan to build up to the Norton Lindsey boundary and WDC wishes to place up to 80 new properties within Norton Lindsey, the cumulative effect would completely decimate the village.
There is a need for an inspector to consider the plans for WDC and SDC together and to take Norton Lindsey out of the immediate process to allow thw above to happen.
There is a statutory requirement for evidence of local housing need to be identified prior to any development being undertaken - the last local housing need survey indicated a need for 3 dwellings in Norton Lindsey - the quota of between 30-80 dwellings would appear to be far and above the local housing need. Norton Lindsey has also benefited from a number of affordable homes schemes over the years and is now well served by affordable housing of various tenures and sizes.
Norton Lindsey does not fulfil the transport criteria to mimimise the need to travel or access to sustainable forms of transport:
- There is no regular public transport
- Main Street is very narrow with many houses abutting the road and a number having accommodation at lower than street level / additional traffic may damage buildings
- The road structures along and leading from the village have bad bends, very narrow sections and no passing places - serious accidents have taken place.
- Norton Lindsey is too remote for walking to destinations such as Warwick and Leamington Spa and due to the road infrastructure cycling is dangerous.
- Parking is a problem with new residential schemes providing insufficient on-site parking causing congestion and safety hazards (30 dwellings could provide an additional 60 vehicles and 80 a minimum of 120 vehicles).
There is no employment in Norton Lindsey to support development. Further the addition of housing will not create any employment. Accordingly development on the scale envisaged runs counter to many of the aspirations as set out in both the Preferred Options document but also the NPPF.
The historic built environment restricts options to improve roads, which would also fundamentally ruin the context and integrity of the buildings.
Development may impact on the conservation areas and the overall historic environment. It is essential need to protect Norton Lindsey' unique heritage for current and future generations and avoid impacting on views and features
Due to environmental considerations and build standards to minimise carbon emissions together with affordable housing contributions, this may mean that such locations as Norton Lindsey are economically unviable to be brought forward for development. Also reference to earlier comments about promoting unsustainable transport.
Agree with the principle of inclusive, safe and healthy communities, but Norton Lindsey is an unsuitable site as it is not within a wide range of facilities.
Standard Response Representation Attached. Text copied below:
Norton Lindsey Village response to Warwick District Council consultation May 2012
New Local Plan Preferred Options
Sheet 1 of 1
Which document are you responding to? Preferred Options (Full Version)
Which part of the document are you responding to? Preferred Option 1 (P01)
Paragraph number I Heading I Subheading (if relevant) - 5.6, 5.10, 5.12, 5.13, 5.15, 5.18,5.22
What is the nature of your representation? OBJECT
Part 1 -Setting the Scene and Summary
P01 - Preferred Level of Growth
OBJECT
It is agreed that some growth will be required during the 2014-2029 period to sustain an
economic and vibrant economy. An increase in homes of appropriate tenures will be
required but the level of growth based on the economic predictions certainly over the
next five years seems excessive especially when viewed against the economic
backdrop. This comment is supported by Office of National Statistics data which reveals
that the rate of increase of Gross Domestic Product has been falling since mid 2010 and
has yet to show signs of recovery. On this basis growth has been downgraded to 0.7%
from 0.8%. Predictions from the respected International Monetary Fund have revised
expectations of growth of 0.8% down to 0.2% with a very modest almost "flat
lining"growth of 0.6% in 2013. Accordingly the base figures being utilised are over
stated.
We believe that the demand for further housing in Norton Lindsey is limited and can be
adequately met by windfall sites and as has been historically the case utilising previously
used land and buildings.
Changes to Preferred Option 1 -adopt a more conservative growth pattern to
reflect market conditions which are likely to prevail over the first half of the Plan
period.
Definitions:
NPPF-National Planning Policy Framework: WOe-Warwick District Council: SOC-Stratford upon Avon District Council
Agent's contact details:
Object
Preferred Options
Representation ID: 51724
Received: 27/07/2012
Respondent: Peter Grady
The proposed level of development is entirely inappropriate and of such a scale (25% increase at 30 homes and 65% increase at 80 homes) that it would cause irreparable harm to the village. It is also disproportionate to the scale and massing of the village and the approach needs to be reconsidered.
Norton Lindsey is uniquely located on the border with SDC and WDC - there are concerns that should SDC decide in their local plan to build up to the Norton Lindsey boundary and WDC wishes to place up to 80 new properties within Norton Lindsey, the cumulative effect would completely decimate the village.
There is a need for an inspector to consider the plans for WDC and SDC together and to take Norton Lindsey out of the immediate process to allow thw above to happen.
There is a statutory requirement for evidence of local housing need to be identified prior to any development being undertaken - the last local housing need survey indicated a need for 3 dwellings in Norton Lindsey - the quota of between 30-80 dwellings would appear to be far and above the local housing need. Norton Lindsey has also benefited from a number of affordable homes schemes over the years and is now well served by affordable housing of various tenures and sizes.
Norton Lindsey does not fulfil the transport criteria to mimimise the need to travel or access to sustainable forms of transport:
- There is no regular public transport
- Main Street is very narrow with many houses abutting the road and a number having accommodation at lower than street level / additional traffic may damage buildings
- The road structures along and leading from the village have bad bends, very narrow sections and no passing places - serious accidents have taken place.
- Norton Lindsey is too remote for walking to destinations such as Warwick and Leamington Spa and due to the road infrastructure cycling is dangerous.
- Parking is a problem with new residential schemes providing insufficient on-site parking causing congestion and safety hazards (30 dwellings could provide an additional 60 vehicles and 80 a minimum of 120 vehicles).
There is no employment in Norton Lindsey to support development. Further the addition of housing will not create any employment. Accordingly development on the scale envisaged runs counter to many of the aspirations as set out in both the Preferred Options document but also the NPPF.
The historic built environment restricts options to improve roads, which would also fundamentally ruin the context and integrity of the buildings.
Development may impact on the conservation areas and the overall historic environment. It is essential need to protect Norton Lindsey' unique heritage for current and future generations and avoid impacting on views and features
Due to environmental considerations and build standards to minimise carbon emissions together with affordable housing contributions, this may mean that such locations as Norton Lindsey are economically unviable to be brought forward for development. Also reference to earlier comments about promoting unsustainable transport.
Agree with the principle of inclusive, safe and healthy communities, but Norton Lindsey is an unsuitable site as it is not within a wide range of facilities.
Standard Response Representation Attached. Text copied below:
Norton Lindsey Village response to Warwick District Council consultation May 2012
New Local Plan Preferred Options
Sheet 1 of 1
Which document are you responding to? Preferred Options (Full Version)
Which part of the document are you responding to? Preferred Option 1 (P01)
Paragraph number I Heading I Subheading (if relevant) - 5.6, 5.10, 5.12, 5.13, 5.15, 5.18,5.22
What is the nature of your representation? OBJECT
Part 1 -Setting the Scene and Summary
P01 - Preferred Level of Growth
OBJECT
It is agreed that some growth will be required during the 2014-2029 period to sustain an
economic and vibrant economy. An increase in homes of appropriate tenures will be
required but the level of growth based on the economic predictions certainly over the
next five years seems excessive especially when viewed against the economic
backdrop. This comment is supported by Office of National Statistics data which reveals
that the rate of increase of Gross Domestic Product has been falling since mid 2010 and
has yet to show signs of recovery. On this basis growth has been downgraded to 0.7%
from 0.8%. Predictions from the respected International Monetary Fund have revised
expectations of growth of 0.8% down to 0.2% with a very modest almost "flat
lining"growth of 0.6% in 2013. Accordingly the base figures being utilised are over
stated.
We believe that the demand for further housing in Norton Lindsey is limited and can be
adequately met by windfall sites and as has been historically the case utilising previously
used land and buildings.
Changes to Preferred Option 1 -adopt a more conservative growth pattern to
reflect market conditions which are likely to prevail over the first half of the Plan
period.
Definitions:
NPPF-National Planning Policy Framework: WOe-Warwick District Council: SOC-Stratford upon Avon District Council
Agent's contact details:
Object
Preferred Options
Representation ID: 51734
Received: 27/07/2012
Respondent: Katie Landreth
The proposed level of development is entirely inappropriate and of such a scale (25% increase at 30 homes and 65% increase at 80 homes) that it would cause irreparable harm to the village. It is also disproportionate to the scale and massing of the village and the approach needs to be reconsidered.
Norton Lindsey is uniquely located on the border with SDC and WDC - there are concerns that should SDC decide in their local plan to build up to the Norton Lindsey boundary and WDC wishes to place up to 80 new properties within Norton Lindsey, the cumulative effect would completely decimate the village.
There is a need for an inspector to consider the plans for WDC and SDC together and to take Norton Lindsey out of the immediate process to allow thw above to happen.
There is a statutory requirement for evidence of local housing need to be identified prior to any development being undertaken - the last local housing need survey indicated a need for 3 dwellings in Norton Lindsey - the quota of between 30-80 dwellings would appear to be far and above the local housing need. Norton Lindsey has also benefited from a number of affordable homes schemes over the years and is now well served by affordable housing of various tenures and sizes.
Norton Lindsey does not fulfil the transport criteria to mimimise the need to travel or access to sustainable forms of transport:
- There is no regular public transport
- Main Street is very narrow with many houses abutting the road and a number having accommodation at lower than street level / additional traffic may damage buildings
- The road structures along and leading from the village have bad bends, very narrow sections and no passing places - serious accidents have taken place.
- Norton Lindsey is too remote for walking to destinations such as Warwick and Leamington Spa and due to the road infrastructure cycling is dangerous.
- Parking is a problem with new residential schemes providing insufficient on-site parking causing congestion and safety hazards (30 dwellings could provide an additional 60 vehicles and 80 a minimum of 120 vehicles).
There is no employment in Norton Lindsey to support development. Further the addition of housing will not create any employment. Accordingly development on the scale envisaged runs counter to many of the aspirations as set out in both the Preferred Options document but also the NPPF.
The historic built environment restricts options to improve roads, which would also fundamentally ruin the context and integrity of the buildings.
Development may impact on the conservation areas and the overall historic environment. It is essential need to protect Norton Lindsey' unique heritage for current and future generations and avoid impacting on views and features
Due to environmental considerations and build standards to minimise carbon emissions together with affordable housing contributions, this may mean that such locations as Norton Lindsey are economically unviable to be brought forward for development. Also reference to earlier comments about promoting unsustainable transport.
Agree with the principle of inclusive, safe and healthy communities, but Norton Lindsey is an unsuitable site as it is not within a wide range of facilities.
Standard Response Representation Attached. Text copied below:
Norton Lindsey Village response to Warwick District Council consultation May 2012
New Local Plan Preferred Options
Sheet 1 of 1
Which document are you responding to? Preferred Options (Full Version)
Which part of the document are you responding to? Preferred Option 1 (P01)
Paragraph number I Heading I Subheading (if relevant) - 5.6, 5.10, 5.12, 5.13, 5.15, 5.18,5.22
What is the nature of your representation? OBJECT
Part 1 -Setting the Scene and Summary
P01 - Preferred Level of Growth
OBJECT
It is agreed that some growth will be required during the 2014-2029 period to sustain an
economic and vibrant economy. An increase in homes of appropriate tenures will be
required but the level of growth based on the economic predictions certainly over the
next five years seems excessive especially when viewed against the economic
backdrop. This comment is supported by Office of National Statistics data which reveals
that the rate of increase of Gross Domestic Product has been falling since mid 2010 and
has yet to show signs of recovery. On this basis growth has been downgraded to 0.7%
from 0.8%. Predictions from the respected International Monetary Fund have revised
expectations of growth of 0.8% down to 0.2% with a very modest almost "flat
lining"growth of 0.6% in 2013. Accordingly the base figures being utilised are over
stated.
We believe that the demand for further housing in Norton Lindsey is limited and can be
adequately met by windfall sites and as has been historically the case utilising previously
used land and buildings.
Changes to Preferred Option 1 -adopt a more conservative growth pattern to
reflect market conditions which are likely to prevail over the first half of the Plan
period.
Definitions:
NPPF-National Planning Policy Framework: WOe-Warwick District Council: SOC-Stratford upon Avon District Council
Agent's contact details:
Object
Preferred Options
Representation ID: 51744
Received: 27/07/2012
Respondent: Hannah Laming
The proposed level of development is entirely inappropriate and of such a scale (25% increase at 30 homes and 65% increase at 80 homes) that it would cause irreparable harm to the village. It is also disproportionate to the scale and massing of the village and the approach needs to be reconsidered.
Norton Lindsey is uniquely located on the border with SDC and WDC - there are concerns that should SDC decide in their local plan to build up to the Norton Lindsey boundary and WDC wishes to place up to 80 new properties within Norton Lindsey, the cumulative effect would completely decimate the village.
There is a need for an inspector to consider the plans for WDC and SDC together and to take Norton Lindsey out of the immediate process to allow thw above to happen.
There is a statutory requirement for evidence of local housing need to be identified prior to any development being undertaken - the last local housing need survey indicated a need for 3 dwellings in Norton Lindsey - the quota of between 30-80 dwellings would appear to be far and above the local housing need. Norton Lindsey has also benefited from a number of affordable homes schemes over the years and is now well served by affordable housing of various tenures and sizes.
Norton Lindsey does not fulfil the transport criteria to mimimise the need to travel or access to sustainable forms of transport:
- There is no regular public transport
- Main Street is very narrow with many houses abutting the road and a number having accommodation at lower than street level / additional traffic may damage buildings
- The road structures along and leading from the village have bad bends, very narrow sections and no passing places - serious accidents have taken place.
- Norton Lindsey is too remote for walking to destinations such as Warwick and Leamington Spa and due to the road infrastructure cycling is dangerous.
- Parking is a problem with new residential schemes providing insufficient on-site parking causing congestion and safety hazards (30 dwellings could provide an additional 60 vehicles and 80 a minimum of 120 vehicles).
There is no employment in Norton Lindsey to support development. Further the addition of housing will not create any employment. Accordingly development on the scale envisaged runs counter to many of the aspirations as set out in both the Preferred Options document but also the NPPF.
The historic built environment restricts options to improve roads, which would also fundamentally ruin the context and integrity of the buildings.
Development may impact on the conservation areas and the overall historic environment. It is essential need to protect Norton Lindsey' unique heritage for current and future generations and avoid impacting on views and features
Due to environmental considerations and build standards to minimise carbon emissions together with affordable housing contributions, this may mean that such locations as Norton Lindsey are economically unviable to be brought forward for development. Also reference to earlier comments about promoting unsustainable transport.
Agree with the principle of inclusive, safe and healthy communities, but Norton Lindsey is an unsuitable site as it is not within a wide range of facilities.
Standard Response Representation Attached. Text copied below:
Norton Lindsey Village response to Warwick District Council consultation May 2012
New Local Plan Preferred Options
Sheet 1 of 1
Which document are you responding to? Preferred Options (Full Version)
Which part of the document are you responding to? Preferred Option 1 (P01)
Paragraph number I Heading I Subheading (if relevant) - 5.6, 5.10, 5.12, 5.13, 5.15, 5.18,5.22
What is the nature of your representation? OBJECT
Part 1 -Setting the Scene and Summary
P01 - Preferred Level of Growth
OBJECT
It is agreed that some growth will be required during the 2014-2029 period to sustain an
economic and vibrant economy. An increase in homes of appropriate tenures will be
required but the level of growth based on the economic predictions certainly over the
next five years seems excessive especially when viewed against the economic
backdrop. This comment is supported by Office of National Statistics data which reveals
that the rate of increase of Gross Domestic Product has been falling since mid 2010 and
has yet to show signs of recovery. On this basis growth has been downgraded to 0.7%
from 0.8%. Predictions from the respected International Monetary Fund have revised
expectations of growth of 0.8% down to 0.2% with a very modest almost "flat
lining"growth of 0.6% in 2013. Accordingly the base figures being utilised are over
stated.
We believe that the demand for further housing in Norton Lindsey is limited and can be
adequately met by windfall sites and as has been historically the case utilising previously
used land and buildings.
Changes to Preferred Option 1 -adopt a more conservative growth pattern to
reflect market conditions which are likely to prevail over the first half of the Plan
period.
Definitions:
NPPF-National Planning Policy Framework: WOe-Warwick District Council: SOC-Stratford upon Avon District Council
Agent's contact details:
Object
Preferred Options
Representation ID: 51754
Received: 27/07/2012
Respondent: David Dixon
The proposed level of development is entirely inappropriate and of such a scale (25% increase at 30 homes and 65% increase at 80 homes) that it would cause irreparable harm to the village. It is also disproportionate to the scale and massing of the village and the approach needs to be reconsidered.
Norton Lindsey is uniquely located on the border with SDC and WDC - there are concerns that should SDC decide in their local plan to build up to the Norton Lindsey boundary and WDC wishes to place up to 80 new properties within Norton Lindsey, the cumulative effect would completely decimate the village.
There is a need for an inspector to consider the plans for WDC and SDC together and to take Norton Lindsey out of the immediate process to allow thw above to happen.
There is a statutory requirement for evidence of local housing need to be identified prior to any development being undertaken - the last local housing need survey indicated a need for 3 dwellings in Norton Lindsey - the quota of between 30-80 dwellings would appear to be far and above the local housing need. Norton Lindsey has also benefited from a number of affordable homes schemes over the years and is now well served by affordable housing of various tenures and sizes.
Norton Lindsey does not fulfil the transport criteria to mimimise the need to travel or access to sustainable forms of transport:
- There is no regular public transport
- Main Street is very narrow with many houses abutting the road and a number having accommodation at lower than street level / additional traffic may damage buildings
- The road structures along and leading from the village have bad bends, very narrow sections and no passing places - serious accidents have taken place.
- Norton Lindsey is too remote for walking to destinations such as Warwick and Leamington Spa and due to the road infrastructure cycling is dangerous.
- Parking is a problem with new residential schemes providing insufficient on-site parking causing congestion and safety hazards (30 dwellings could provide an additional 60 vehicles and 80 a minimum of 120 vehicles).
There is no employment in Norton Lindsey to support development. Further the addition of housing will not create any employment. Accordingly development on the scale envisaged runs counter to many of the aspirations as set out in both the Preferred Options document but also the NPPF.
The historic built environment restricts options to improve roads, which would also fundamentally ruin the context and integrity of the buildings.
Development may impact on the conservation areas and the overall historic environment. It is essential need to protect Norton Lindsey' unique heritage for current and future generations and avoid impacting on views and features
Due to environmental considerations and build standards to minimise carbon emissions together with affordable housing contributions, this may mean that such locations as Norton Lindsey are economically unviable to be brought forward for development. Also reference to earlier comments about promoting unsustainable transport.
Agree with the principle of inclusive, safe and healthy communities, but Norton Lindsey is an unsuitable site as it is not within a wide range of facilities.
Standard Response Representation Attached. Text copied below:
Norton Lindsey Village response to Warwick District Council consultation May 2012
New Local Plan Preferred Options
Sheet 1 of 1
Which document are you responding to? Preferred Options (Full Version)
Which part of the document are you responding to? Preferred Option 1 (P01)
Paragraph number I Heading I Subheading (if relevant) - 5.6, 5.10, 5.12, 5.13, 5.15, 5.18,5.22
What is the nature of your representation? OBJECT
Part 1 -Setting the Scene and Summary
P01 - Preferred Level of Growth
OBJECT
It is agreed that some growth will be required during the 2014-2029 period to sustain an
economic and vibrant economy. An increase in homes of appropriate tenures will be
required but the level of growth based on the economic predictions certainly over the
next five years seems excessive especially when viewed against the economic
backdrop. This comment is supported by Office of National Statistics data which reveals
that the rate of increase of Gross Domestic Product has been falling since mid 2010 and
has yet to show signs of recovery. On this basis growth has been downgraded to 0.7%
from 0.8%. Predictions from the respected International Monetary Fund have revised
expectations of growth of 0.8% down to 0.2% with a very modest almost "flat
lining"growth of 0.6% in 2013. Accordingly the base figures being utilised are over
stated.
We believe that the demand for further housing in Norton Lindsey is limited and can be
adequately met by windfall sites and as has been historically the case utilising previously
used land and buildings.
Changes to Preferred Option 1 -adopt a more conservative growth pattern to
reflect market conditions which are likely to prevail over the first half of the Plan
period.
Definitions:
NPPF-National Planning Policy Framework: WOe-Warwick District Council: SOC-Stratford upon Avon District Council
Agent's contact details: