Loes Farm (North of Woodloes)

Showing comments and forms 61 to 90 of 214

Object

Preferred Options

Representation ID: 48644

Received: 27/07/2012

Respondent: Mrs H Taylor

Representation Summary:

Very sad that greenbelt land is to be used for building houses, it will also affect wlldlife. We moved to Woodloes for this reason - green outlook!

Full text:

scanned representation

Attachments:

Object

Preferred Options

Representation ID: 48645

Received: 27/07/2012

Respondent: Mr Keith Eykyn

Representation Summary:

Is green belt land and should remain so.

Lots of wildlife in the area and mature trees and hedgerows.

Impact of traffic on Primrose Hill, Spinny Hill and Coventry Road. It is night mare at certain times of the day.

The impact on services like Warwick Hospital/ doctors/ dentist etc.

Full text:

Scanned Representation

Attachments:

Object

Preferred Options

Representation ID: 48891

Received: 27/07/2012

Respondent: Mr John Walker

Representation Summary:

Object to building on Green Belt. Rare medieval ridge and furrow field would be destroyed. Should build on brownfield.
Traffic problems. Impact on sewage and drains, system inadequate currently.
No consideration given to schools, hospital needs.
No feasability study.

Full text:

Document scanned.

Attachments:

Object

Preferred Options

Representation ID: 48935

Received: 27/07/2012

Respondent: Mr Lee Butler

Representation Summary:

Destroy the character of the area and ruin the attractive and inviting route into town,

Full text:

Document scanned.

Attachments:

Object

Preferred Options

Representation ID: 48937

Received: 27/07/2012

Respondent: Mr Brian Wall

Representation Summary:

Green Belt. Ruining the lovely drive into "historic Warwick"
Traffic is a nightmare at rush hour.

Full text:

Document scanned.

Attachments:

Object

Preferred Options

Representation ID: 48938

Received: 27/07/2012

Respondent: Mrs Aimie Brown

Representation Summary:

Object to building on green belt. There are endangered specieis and beautiful country walks.

Full text:

Document scanned.

Attachments:

Object

Preferred Options

Representation ID: 48939

Received: 27/07/2012

Respondent: Mr Michael Cox

Representation Summary:

Object on grounds that the traffic around Primrose Hill and Greville Road is very high and dangerous already.
Residents have to keep windows closed to keep the traffic noise out. It is very noisy in the back garden. The traffic and noise will increase with new estate.

Full text:

Document scanned.

Attachments:

Object

Preferred Options

Representation ID: 48945

Received: 27/07/2012

Respondent: Mrs Christina Jones

Representation Summary:

It will destroy the characer of the area and wild life in the area would be ruined.

Full text:

Document scanned.

Attachments:

Object

Preferred Options

Representation ID: 48947

Received: 27/07/2012

Respondent: Mr Jamie Waitkins

Representation Summary:

Green Belt, protected species, ancient hedgerows and trees.

Full text:

Document scanned.

Attachments:

Object

Preferred Options

Representation ID: 48966

Received: 27/07/2012

Respondent: Mrs Dorothy MacFarlane

Representation Summary:

Object to building by Woodloes.

Full text:

Document scanned

Attachments:

Object

Preferred Options

Representation ID: 48967

Received: 27/07/2012

Respondent: Mrs Carol Eykyn

Representation Summary:

Object to building on Green Belt. It will destroy wild life haven.

Increased pressure on hospitals and schools.
Potential increase for flodding.
Excess pressure on local raods. Spinney Hill, Coventry road and Primrose Hill.

Full text:

Document scanned

Attachments:

Object

Preferred Options

Representation ID: 48968

Received: 27/07/2012

Respondent: Mr Wayne Brown

Representation Summary:

This is a beautiful bit of countryside.

Full text:

Document scanned.

Attachments:

Object

Preferred Options

Representation ID: 48971

Received: 16/10/2012

Respondent: Mrs Sybil Robins

Representation Summary:

Put pressure on current roads. A roundabouut planned in front of my granddaughters house, she has small kids it will be dangerous.

Put strain on community resources which are already stretched.

Full text:

Document scanned.

Attachments:

Object

Preferred Options

Representation ID: 48974

Received: 27/07/2012

Respondent: Mrs Emma Tutt

Representation Summary:

Object to building on green belt. It will destroy wild life.

Full text:

Document scanned.

Attachments:

Object

Preferred Options

Representation ID: 48975

Received: 27/07/2012

Respondent: Mrs Ruth Couter

Representation Summary:

Who would want to live next door to such a huge development of social housing. the schools and services within the area are already stretched to capacity.

Full text:

Document scanned.

Attachments:

Object

Preferred Options

Representation ID: 48976

Received: 27/07/2012

Respondent: Mrs Lesley Goddard

Representation Summary:

Object to building on Green belt. Use land everyday for walks our dogs. It would spoil everything we love on Woodloes and we don't want it!

Full text:

Document scanned.

Attachments:

Object

Preferred Options

Representation ID: 48977

Received: 27/07/2012

Respondent: Mrs Jeanie Kugour

Representation Summary:

No to 180 houses.
No to island on main road.
No to killing wildlife.

Full text:

Document scanned.

Attachments:

Object

Preferred Options

Representation ID: 49005

Received: 27/07/2012

Respondent: Mrs Nicola Compton

Representation Summary:

Object to 180 new houses on following points:
Traffic already dangerous during rush hours.
Schools are already oversubscribed. Is theres funding for new schools?
House prices will drop.
Often visit this area to walk my dog and enjoy the peaceful countryside which will no longer be there.

Full text:

Document scanned.

Attachments:

Object

Preferred Options

Representation ID: 49007

Received: 27/07/2012

Respondent: Mr Matthew Cooper

Representation Summary:

Devalue my house
More congestion to already busy road
Wildlife that would be destroyed
Schools and hospitals, ambulance, fire brigade in the area are already full capacity
Crime will increase in the area

Full text:

Document Scanned.

Attachments:

Object

Preferred Options

Representation ID: 49010

Received: 27/07/2012

Respondent: Ms Lorna Winfield

Representation Summary:

Affect house prices.
The through road would be directly in front of our house.
Traffic will get worse.
Development would be ruin the green belt and lovely walks and affect wild life.

Full text:

Document scanned

Attachments:

Object

Preferred Options

Representation ID: 49011

Received: 27/07/2012

Respondent: Mrs Linda Jeffs

Representation Summary:

Object building on Green Belt.
Numerous birds and animals living in this habitat. Will result in further decline of British wildlife.
Access from Primrose Hill will make traffic busier, which is currently dangerous for pedestrians. Will make traffic busier on the rest of the Woodloes.

Full text:

Document scanned.

Attachments:

Object

Preferred Options

Representation ID: 49012

Received: 27/07/2012

Respondent: Mr David Impey

Representation Summary:

Object to building on Green belt. Present lane makes an apt boundary.

Full text:

Document scanned.

Attachments:

Object

Preferred Options

Representation ID: 49014

Received: 27/07/2012

Respondent: Mr Ryan Connolly

Representation Summary:

Object to building on Green Built.
Traffic on A429 and roads leading to and from it is already at a standstill at peak times.

Full text:

Document scanned.

Attachments:

Object

Preferred Options

Representation ID: 49064

Received: 20/07/2012

Respondent: Mrs Glenys Hopkins

Representation Summary:

The sites was not included in previous Local Plan and it is not clear what has changed.
There would be a loss of wildlife if the Loes Farm plan went ahead as demonstrated by an ecological survey.
there would also be a reduction in the green belt between Warwick and Leek Wootton which would affect the character of the Town.
There would be an increase in traffic congestion. The impact would be to worsen conditions in terms of demand on infrastructure.
There would be a loss to the historical environment as well as the ecological loss (eg through the access).

Full text:

I have attended the public consultations on the proposed New Local Plan - 2012. I have listened to statements for and against the proposals and have decided to register my objection to the proposals re Loes Farm. The Loes Farm site was not included in the previous Local Plan, and was deemed unfavourable for development, what as change? The site is of historical importance and includes sightlines from Guys Cliffe. In an ecological survey it was discovered to contain over 30 different types of grasses and is an habitat to wildlife including protected species of Bats, if this development goes ahead this will be completely destroyed forever. Development will also mean a reduction in the greenbelt space between Warwick and Leek Wootton - which is also being developed towards Warwick and this would adversely affect the character and attraction of Warwick market town.
I strongly object to the prospect of an increase in traffic due to this sites development, which will add to existing traffic congestion especially at peak times. It is proposed that access to this site would be from Primrose Hill. The proposed roundabout access will destroy remains of 17th century hedgerows. Not only this, but the extra traffic will be considerable at the Woodloes roundabout on the Coventry Road. Although it is proposed to ease this pressure at the Woodloes roundabout it does not take into account the serious conjestion at other points on Primrose Hill. i.e junction with Woodloes Avenue South which has seen accidents and bumps. The Cape Road junction onto Woodloes. and conjestion at Birmingham Road onto Woodloes. The small island at this point was funded by IBM to ease the flow of traffic at this point. Unfortunately we now find ourselves in the same position before the island was built - ie traffic bumper to bumper at peak times. We also have traffic queing all the way from St. Johns up the Coventry Road and even onto the slip road of the A46 during rush hour. The impact of these 180 houses proposed will only increase this situation no matter what alterations are proposed to accommodate these houses we will see major, major problems. Has consideration been given to the safety of pedestrians crossing Primrose Hill from this site. Primrose Hill as speeding traffic hence the need for the police mobile camera as pedestrians will need to cross this road to schools and facilities.
If Warwick District Council give the go ahead for Loes Farm to be developed then they will be responsible for the destruction of this historical and ecological landscape for future generations, which according to their preferred options they say in their Local Plan they wish to avoid.
Please register my objection to this development.

Support

Preferred Options

Representation ID: 49092

Received: 02/08/2012

Respondent: Mr and Mrs Forrester

Number of people: 2

Agent: RPS Planning & Development

Representation Summary:

Supports location of this site for 180 dwellings as it forms a natural expansion to the town of Warwick, is close to community facilities and employment areas and is in accordance with NPPF

Full text:

Scanned letter and Response Form

Attachments:

Object

Preferred Options

Representation ID: 49117

Received: 27/07/2012

Respondent: Ms Claire Wyatt

Representation Summary:

At peak time the traffic around the A429 is already a nightmare to drive through.

Full text:

Scanned Response Form

Attachments:

Support

Preferred Options

Representation ID: 49155

Received: 26/07/2012

Respondent: Mr and Mrs Forrester

Agent: Barlow Associates Limited

Representation Summary:

Supports the Loes Farm site. Other land is still available if that within the Registered Park and Garden is excluded. Additional land promoted.
Supports Preferred Options methodology.
Considers the benefits of the site to be:
Several access points.
Agricultural land only Grade3.
Well screened and trees could be thickened.
No footpaths through site.
May have positive impact on supporting services, including shops/businesses and possible new shop with development.
Loss of green belt compensated by new open space. Preferable to larger sites.
Close to employment, hospital, Warwick stations and road network.

Full text:

We can confirm that we act as agents for the Forresters, who are the sole owners of this land and are keen to bring the land forward for development.
Map 2 showing potentially suitable urban edge sites show the whole of our clients
land coloured in orange but, on Map 4, a restricted area was allocated. Whilst we
are happy with this allocation, should there be a shortfall or should you require
further land, we previously highlighted the availability of all of the land edged red on the attached Rural Land Register map.
If there are issues around the development of the land shaded green on Plan 1
attached, being part of the Registered Park and Gardens to Guys Cliffe, that would
still leave OS.7413 and 9532 available for development and these areas, as shown on the attached Rural Land Register Map, extend to 5.29 hectares, or thereabouts.
As a general principle, our clients support the methodology behind the Preferred
Options and believe that a more "dilute and disperse" policy, as put forward, is
preferable to that previously advocated, specifically much larger sites which
encroach substantially into Green Belt.
We believe the benefits of this site have been previously advocated, namely in
submissions last July, but there are one or two further points which we think are
worth putting forward, and these are:-
Access to Loes Farm
We are formally consulting with Warwickshire County Council on alternatives to
access the site. There are at least three under consideration:-
a) The widening of the existing farm access to Loes Farm, which accesses the
Coventry Road / A429 near Guy's Cliffe. This would then run straight into the
proposed development site.
b) Access off Primrose Hill and into the site from the south. We understand from
our clients that this was originally envisaged 30 to 40 years ago when Woodloes
was developed. This is the preferred option.
c) The possible use of Woodloes Lane. This is in fact owned by my clients, but we
think that it may be difficult to widen sufficiently to provide the access desired.
We will come back to you in due course in this regard.
2. Loss of Agricultural Land
The land in question is only Grade 3, all of it grazed.
3. Visual Impact
The majority of the land is well screened by a mixture of existing vegetation or
landscape features such as the slopes of the land and the contours.
The eastern boundary of the proposed development consists of an old hedgeline,
shown on the attached plan, which is marked by a bank and a number of
significant mature trees which would remain and which could be thickened to
further improve the screening from the east. Just west of this line the land slopes
away towards the A46 to the north and west and towards Woodloes Lane. There
is a mature hedgerow along Woodloes Lane, which screens the proposed
development land, and further screening could be implemented here. There are
few properties that look out onto the proposed site and fewer that would have an
extensive view. One property in the south-east corner would look out onto part of
the site, but this too has screening around it as does the adjacent plant nursery,
and we envisaged that this would be thickened and widened for privacy.
There are no views into the site from the north because of the existing properties
and farm building, together with the screening against the A46. This runs along
the north and north-western boundaries as well.
There are no footpaths through the site, the only footpath that would be affected
is one that runs along Woodloes Lane, which is owned by my client. There are
limited views into part of the site from this path and due to the contours, the
existing hedgerow and the proposed screening, the path would be little affected.
3. Infrastructure and Local Amenity
We do not believe that the level of housing proposed would impact adversely on
existing local services. Indeed, Woodloes has both a new Junior and Infant
school on Deansway, together with an adjacent new special needs Junior and
Infant school at Ridgway, immediately adjacent. These would be within walking
distance of the proposed development.
The nearest secondary school is at Myton, with a further new school recently
constructed at North Leamington and both of these can be reached easily by
public transport. The former is in walking distance.
There is a shopping centre on Woodloes Avenue South with a wide variety of
shops, which the proposed development would help to support. These include a
pharmacy, a newsagent, post office, off-licence, coffee shop, fish and chip shop,
convenience store, hairdresser, Chinese take-away, launderette and the public
house. There have been proposals for a Co-Op development on the public
house site as well
Adjacent to the school there is an existing Community Centre and also nearby
the Woodloes House, run by the Coventry and Warwick NHS.
We believe, therefore, that the existing development would aid the maintenance
and support of these existing facilities.
4. Loss of Green Belt
To satisfy the needs of the Warwick District area, the Green Belt boundaries are
having to be altered to allow for provision of housing. My clients support the
"dilute and disperse" policy that has been put forward through the Draft Local
Plan and the Preferred Options, and find this approach preferable to much larger
sites.
A significant advantage of this proposed site is that Woodloes itself is relatively
short of public open space and this proposed development will allow this to be
improved on to the benefit of the general area.
5. Access to the Wider Area
The proposed site is particularly well located in relation to the following facilities
and modes of transport.
a) the adjoining industrial estate around Wedgenock Lane;
b) Warwick Hospital, just south of the site off the Coventry Road;
c) Warwick Station which is walkable;
d) Warwick Parkway Station, which is only a short drive away, either via the A46 or via the Coventry Road;
e) the A46 which is very close and the proposed new road network running from the Coventry Road / Kenilworth Road junction, via the north of Leamington to the
A452.
f) both Warwick and Leamington centres which are readily accessible by public
transport; and
g) there is a good system of footpaths through Guy's Cliffe to the surrounding area, including the River Avon.

Object

Preferred Options

Representation ID: 49233

Received: 27/07/2012

Respondent: Mr Samuel Newey

Representation Summary:

Object because area cannot sustain the additional population on roads, schooling, employment and recreation.
The Woodloes is big enough for existing facilities as it is.
The existing green areas around the area is precious and should be preserved and treasured not destroyed and turned into a concrete jungle just to please governments and increase revenue.

Full text:

Scanned form

Attachments:

Object

Preferred Options

Representation ID: 49235

Received: 27/07/2012

Respondent: Mrs Beverley Hurst-Newey

Representation Summary:

I did not buy my house and have a balcony put on the side to look at a housing estate. The island is going to be right in front of my house, which I will also be too noisy. I don't suppose you are going to compensate us the money we will lose on out house, because of this development. The wild life will be affected badly and the history of the Roman road and Saxon mill Piers Gavistons wood will all be destroyed by this.

Full text:

Scanned form

Attachments:

Object

Preferred Options

Representation ID: 49236

Received: 27/07/2012

Respondent: Mr Gan Pitts

Representation Summary:

The land falls within Greenbelt land.
Destroy the character of the area and ruin the attractive and inviting route into town.

Full text:

Scanned form

Attachments: