Do you support or object to the preferred option for Waste and Recycling?
Support
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 2662
Received: 14/09/2009
Respondent: John Arnold
Support.
Support
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 2724
Received: 10/09/2009
Respondent: Mrs Margaret Devitt
Support.
Support
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 2777
Received: 09/09/2009
Respondent: Pauline Neale
With the collection of plastics the recycling system would be even more comprehensive.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 2901
Received: 11/09/2009
Respondent: Susan Butcher
Object.
Support
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 2954
Received: 15/09/2009
Respondent: Barford, Sherbourne and Wasperton Joint Parish Council
Support.
Support
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 3013
Received: 16/09/2009
Respondent: Mrs and Mr J Parr and Cotterill
This change could - should go ahead.
Support
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 3118
Received: 17/09/2000
Respondent: Mr Anthony Morris
Support
Support
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 3131
Received: 18/09/2009
Respondent: Mel Gillman
Support option.
Support
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 3247
Received: 20/09/2009
Respondent: mrs stella moore
in line with national policy
Support
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 3304
Received: 20/09/2009
Respondent: Mr David John Bowers
I support it.
Support
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 3324
Received: 17/09/2009
Respondent: Caroline Martin
Support
Support
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 3363
Received: 10/09/2009
Respondent: Mr Terence Kemp
Support
Support
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 3425
Received: 16/09/2009
Respondent: Mrs M Kane
Support
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 3496
Received: 18/09/2009
Respondent: Mrs E. Appleby
We have not been given enough information.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 3595
Received: 16/09/2009
Respondent: Mr Owen
object
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 3599
Received: 16/09/2009
Respondent: Mr Owen
object
Support
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 3732
Received: 23/09/2009
Respondent: Mr Richard Brookes
Supported.
Support
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 3773
Received: 15/09/2009
Respondent: Mr Dennis Michael Crips
Support
Support
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 4116
Received: 24/09/2009
Respondent: Ms Angela Clarke
Support
Comment
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 4218
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: Onkar Mann
Not sure that I do
Support
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 4489
Received: 24/09/2009
Respondent: Andrea Telford
support
Support
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 4574
Received: 22/09/2009
Respondent: Southern Windy Arbour Area Residents' Association
support
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 4641
Received: 23/09/2009
Respondent: Mr S Morris
Object
Support
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 4735
Received: 23/10/2009
Respondent: V Gill Peppitt
support
Support
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 4906
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: Vera Leeke
Support.
Support
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 5092
Received: 09/10/2009
Respondent: Mr Graham Harrison
Support
Support
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 5181
Received: 22/09/2009
Respondent: Mr Barry Betts
Support.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 5246
Received: 23/09/2009
Respondent: Sonia Owczarek
Object.
Support
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 5319
Received: 23/10/2009
Respondent: Lindsay Wood
Support
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 5321
Received: 23/09/2009
Respondent: J. N. Price
Based on the current levels of recycling in the district, the targets quoted are not cahallenging and should be lifted.