Do you agree that the Council has identified all reasonable options for Sustainable Buildings?

Support

Representation ID: 2579

Received: 10/09/2009

Respondent: Mr R.A and Mrs B.E Donaldson

Number of people: 2

Carbon emissions are a vitally important consideration.

Support

Representation ID: 2657

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: John Arnold

Support.

Comment

Representation ID: 2717

Received: 10/09/2009

Respondent: Mrs Margaret Devitt

Please let us have a Leamington reusable energy policy and programme, reducting initial costs by involving many local households.

Support

Representation ID: 2772

Received: 09/09/2009

Respondent: Pauline Neale

It is responsible in overseeing the effects of climate change. Solar panels should be built into a proportion of new houses as well as cladding and measures to conserve energy.

Support

Representation ID: 2951

Received: 15/09/2009

Respondent: Barford, Sherbourne and Wasperton Joint Parish Council

Support.

Object

Representation ID: 3010

Received: 16/09/2009

Respondent: Mrs and Mr J Parr and Cotterill

Building new homes is too harmful to the environment.

Support

Representation ID: 3113

Received: 17/09/2000

Respondent: Mr Anthony Morris

Support

Support

Representation ID: 3128

Received: 18/09/2009

Respondent: Mel Gillman

The option for sustainable development and infrastructure is to be supported.

Support

Representation ID: 3188

Received: 15/09/2009

Respondent: John Murphy

Support.

Support

Representation ID: 3299

Received: 20/09/2009

Respondent: Mr David John Bowers

I support it.

Support

Representation ID: 3357

Received: 10/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Terence Kemp

Support

Support

Representation ID: 3727

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Richard Brookes

Yes.

Support

Representation ID: 3770

Received: 15/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Dennis Michael Crips

Support

Object

Representation ID: 3938

Received: 24/09/2009

Respondent: Debbie Wiggins

You have a sustainable building strategy that is not effective enough. Your density proposal is too crowded and WILL add to the urban heat island. You have not mandated recycling of water, putting electricty back to the grid, the use of sustainable building materials (in fact your planning dept still prefers people to use brick rather than eco friendly materials). This seems to be paying lipservice - you need to do much much more to ensure ALL new houses will meet strict sustainability criteria.

You have completely ignored where you will get water from for the new homes.

Comment

Representation ID: 4096

Received: 24/09/2009

Respondent: Mrs Diana Sellwood

I support all options for sustainable buildings

Support

Representation ID: 4110

Received: 24/09/2009

Respondent: Ms Angela Clarke

Support

Object

Representation ID: 4213

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Onkar Mann

The requirements for water supply and flooding have not been adequately considered when allocating areas for additional housing development to the South of Warwick, Leamington & Whitnash. Traffic flows have not received adequate consideration, as new developments should be near Warwick parkway, Kenilworth (new station) and North Leamington,to provide better access to A46, M45/A45 and M40 without going through Leamington & Warwick centres, resulting in reduced traffic over the Leam/Avon bridges
New employment areas should be created to the North of the Town with access from the A46 to reduce travel from Kenilworth & North Leamington through Leamington/Warwick town centres.

Comment

Representation ID: 4248

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Aldi Stores Ltd

Agent: WYG Planning & Design

The percentage target which the Core Strategy should set should relate to energy used in accordance with the emerging RSS Phase 2 (Revision) policy and the figure should be set at 10 percent which is supported by the local climate change strategy and emerging regional and national policy

Object

Representation ID: 4273

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Kulwinder Fathers

Water supply and flooding risk have not been considered when allocating areas for housing development in areas South of Warwick, Leamington & Whitnash. Impact on traffic has not been considered adequately. New developments should be located to the north of the district near Warwick parkway, Kenilworth (new station) and North Leamington to provide better access to A46, M45/A45 and M40 without going through Leamington/Warwick centres & over the bridges in Leamington. New employment areas need to be located to the north of Leamington & Warwick as good access to A46/M40 and will reduce traffic through Leamington/Warwick centres

Support

Representation ID: 4458

Received: 24/09/2009

Respondent: Andrea Telford

support

Support

Representation ID: 4565

Received: 22/09/2009

Respondent: Southern Windy Arbour Area Residents' Association

support

Support

Representation ID: 4636

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Mr S Morris

support

Support

Representation ID: 4730

Received: 23/10/2009

Respondent: V Gill Peppitt

support

Support

Representation ID: 4901

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Vera Leeke

Support.

Object

Representation ID: 4924

Received: 22/09/2009

Respondent: L Hughes

Low carbon affordable housing contradiction in terms. Carbon saving proposals cost more, savings are overstated and some even counter-productive. Most either not tenable without subsidy or pay back times are extensive.

Object

Representation ID: 5015

Received: 08/10/2009

Respondent: Mr Graham Harrison

NO- Confining options to new development is too narrow. Core Strategy should be looking at energy efficiency overall, including opportunities for retro- fitting existing buildings. It should also consider energy generation as well as consumption. What will be the criteria for assessing windfarms, bioenergy plants and combined heat and power, for example.

Object

Representation ID: 5176

Received: 22/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Barry Betts

You discuss the importance of low carbon emissions, but are intent on building enough new homes to accommodate several thousand new vehicles in confined areas! Unbelievable!

Object

Representation ID: 5239

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Sonia Owczarek

Object.

Object

Representation ID: 5301

Received: 23/10/2009

Respondent: Lindsay Wood

object

Object

Representation ID: 5367

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: SEAN DEELY

No detail is provided in the Core Strategy Preferred Options Paper