Do you support or object to the preferred option for the Built Environment?

Object

Representation ID: 288

Received: 10/07/2009

Respondent: Patricia Robinson

Object.

Object

Representation ID: 385

Received: 22/07/2009

Respondent: Peter Pounds

Object.

Support

Representation ID: 461

Received: 27/07/2009

Respondent: Peter Clarke

Support.

Support

Representation ID: 513

Received: 24/07/2009

Respondent: Georgina Wilson

Support.

Support

Representation ID: 584

Received: 27/07/2009

Respondent: Mr A M Webley

Support.

Object

Representation ID: 647

Received: 23/07/2009

Respondent: Mr G.R. Summers

Object.

Object

Representation ID: 736

Received: 10/08/2009

Respondent: P.A. Yarwood

Object.

Support

Representation ID: 807

Received: 05/08/2009

Respondent: Faye Davis

Support.

Support

Representation ID: 938

Received: 19/08/2009

Respondent: Christine Betts

Support.

Support

Representation ID: 1042

Received: 21/08/2009

Respondent: Kirit Marvania

Support

Support

Representation ID: 1043

Received: 21/08/2009

Respondent: Kirit Marvania

Support

Comment

Representation ID: 1109

Received: 21/08/2009

Respondent: Mrs Pamela Beedham

Object to squeezing of new homes on sites of gardens and demolished older houses so appearance and character of roads are spolit.

Support

Representation ID: 1146

Received: 24/08/2009

Respondent: Mr and Mrs T Robinson

Support

Object

Representation ID: 1208

Received: 21/08/2009

Respondent: Barry Elliman

Object

Support

Representation ID: 1273

Received: 24/08/2009

Respondent: Andrew Horsley

Support

Support

Representation ID: 1332

Received: 24/08/2009

Respondent: Sarah Jane Horsley

Support

Object

Representation ID: 1498

Received: 27/08/2009

Respondent: Mr and Mrs Kundi

Number of people: 2

Object.

Object

Representation ID: 1563

Received: 31/08/2009

Respondent: Mr Nigel Hamilton

When will this "future " work be done?
In the meantime what guidelines/ policy will apply?

Design by committee seldom works- especially if from people with no experience of architectural design or quality building, apply/ incorporate CABE and English Heritage guidelines into the WDC policy framework.

Most recent developments have been very low quality- horrible pastiches with pokey rooms and virtually no open space. These need to be avoided in the future! An example is Bread & Meat Close which broke the WDC guidelines on massing, height & impact on the Warwick Common, the only "open space" is a car-park!

Support

Representation ID: 1583

Received: 31/08/2009

Respondent: B.L.A.S.T.

18b Where gardens are not possible eg flats adequate space must be found to provide green growing areas in the form of local collectives or establishing new allotments else we run the risk of healthy lifestyles being reduced

Object

Representation ID: 1718

Received: 27/08/2009

Respondent: J.G Whetstone

Object.

Support

Representation ID: 1865

Received: 28/08/2009

Respondent: Val Hunnisett

Support.

Object

Representation ID: 1901

Received: 31/07/2009

Respondent: Mrs Helen Cheatham

Not enough information.

Support

Representation ID: 1964

Received: 03/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Andrew Ferguson

Start with your building!!

Support

Representation ID: 2092

Received: 05/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Peter Kerr

The point stated in 18.8 seems the only sensible option.

Support

Representation ID: 2199

Received: 07/09/2009

Respondent: Mr and Mrs Barrie and Margaret Hayles

Support.

Object

Representation ID: 2349

Received: 21/07/2009

Respondent: S B Hoyles

Object.

Object

Representation ID: 2415

Received: 04/09/2009

Respondent: Roy Standley

No.

Object

Representation ID: 2460

Received: 08/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Connolly

Object.

Support

Representation ID: 2507

Received: 09/09/2009

Respondent: British Waterways

Support.

Support

Representation ID: 2578

Received: 10/09/2009

Respondent: Mr R.A and Mrs B.E Donaldson

Number of people: 2

Yet to be developed.