Do you support or object to the preferred option for the Natural Environment, particularly in respect of amendments to the Area of Restraint designation?

Object

Representation ID: 4156

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Woodland Trust

We therefore look forward to the Core Strategy including strategic policies that will protect, enhance and link the natural environment, including ancient woodland, in accordance with national and regional planning policy including the UK BAP priority habitats obligation.
We would therefore like to see expansion of the natural environment as a preferred option in this policy.

Object

Representation ID: 4210

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Onkar Mann

I do not agree with the amendment to allow for strategic allocations to the South of Warwick, Leamington Spa and Whitnash. The open countryside should be retained and land previously marked as areas of restraint should be adhered to.

Object

Representation ID: 4272

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Kulwinder Fathers

I do not agree with the amendment to allow for strategic allocations to the South of Warwick, Leamington Spa and Whitnash. The open countryside should be retained and land previously marked as areas of restraint should be adhered to.

Support

Representation ID: 4455

Received: 24/09/2009

Respondent: Andrea Telford

support

Support

Representation ID: 4562

Received: 22/09/2009

Respondent: Southern Windy Arbour Area Residents' Association

support

Object

Representation ID: 4632

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Mr S Morris

No amendments should be accepted.

Support

Representation ID: 4728

Received: 23/10/2009

Respondent: V Gill Peppitt

It is vital however to maintain area of greenbelt between Whitnash and Bishops Tachbrook.

Object

Representation ID: 4845

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Mr. Andrew Clarke

Object.

Object

Representation ID: 4897

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Vera Leeke

The existing A of R at Europa Way and Woodside Farm should be retained and respected. The proposed A of R at Lower Heathcote Farm should be extended to Harbury Lane

Support

Representation ID: 5011

Received: 08/10/2009

Respondent: Mr Graham Harrison

Qualified YES _ Generally insufficient importance is given to conserving and enhancing the biodiversity. There appears to be no recognition of the vital role that biodiversity can play in helping urban areas to adapt to climate change, nor of the role the countryside should play in energy generation. Green infrastructure role should be acknowledged.

Object

Representation ID: 5171

Received: 22/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Barry Betts

Policy is to easily amendable so is pointless.

Object

Representation ID: 5235

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Sonia Owczarek

Object.

Object

Representation ID: 5296

Received: 23/10/2009

Respondent: Lindsay Wood

Yet again your objectives are clashing.

Support

Representation ID: 5311

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: J. N. Price

As expressed, clauses 16.12 to 16.14 appear to meet the above-mentioned criteria.

Object

Representation ID: 5364

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: SEAN DEELY

No detail is provided in the Core Strategy Preferred Options Paper

Object

Representation ID: 5416

Received: 24/09/2009

Respondent: John Baxter

The Kings Hill proposal will damage the Natural Environment.

Support

Representation ID: 5456

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Mike Cheeseman

Support.

Support

Representation ID: 5490

Received: 27/09/2009

Respondent: Joanna Illingworth

But doubt if it will be attained in the face of pressures for intensive development.

Object

Representation ID: 5550

Received: 22/09/2009

Respondent: Mr and Mrs G Morgan

Number of people: 2

Areas of restraint are also current green belt or not? It must be.

Object

Representation ID: 5595

Received: 20/09/2009

Respondent: George Martin

I strongly support retention of the green belt and indeed their selective expansion. Policies should also be linked to the UK Biodiversity Action Plan and the Countryside and Rights of Way Act

Support

Representation ID: 5678

Received: 20/09/2009

Respondent: Jane Boynton

Yes, of critical importance to maintain green spaces.

Support

Representation ID: 5728

Received: 22/09/2009

Respondent: Roger Warren

Support.

Support

Representation ID: 5788

Received: 24/09/2009

Respondent: Philip Wilson

I believe that the concept of keeping a green gap between towns and villages is vital and must be maintained and in fact guaranteed against future development plans

Support

Representation ID: 5800

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: PG Swann

The proposed ' Area of Restraint' between south of Leamington options and the village of Bishops Tachbrook is necessary, and is supported, so as to indicate clearly that development in this area has reached a natural, and defensible termination(ie: the Tach Brook valley) which should be dedicated and laid out a major, landscaped, linear

Object

Representation ID: 5829

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Ms Alison Cox

In particular the removal of 1E from designated Areas of Restraint will completely destroy the distinction between the towns of Leamington and Warwick and create a vast urban sprawl.

Support

Representation ID: 5867

Received: 13/10/2009

Respondent: Pamela Payne

As long as areas of natural environment are kept free of development are are not eventually built on.

Support

Representation ID: 5945

Received: 28/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Alan Roberts

Support.

Object

Representation ID: 6014

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Debbie Harris

There is no point having these designated areas if the Council can change them when they feel like it.

Object

Representation ID: 6047

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Paul Skidmore

With one hand restraints are put on areas on the other hand when you want to develop somewhere the restraint is lifted.

Object

Representation ID: 6145

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Richard and Judy Swallow

Number of people: 2

Object