Do you agree that the Council has identified all reasonable options for the Natural Environment?

Showing comments and forms 1 to 30 of 1396

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 220

Received: 03/07/2009

Respondent: Mrs Caroline Baxter

Representation Summary:

Building new houses on rural or green land, will destroy hedgerows and established trees.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 242

Received: 09/07/2009

Respondent: Mr Duncan Hurwood

Representation Summary:

No. The council is putting housing above the natural environment in green-belt areas. I disagree with this approach.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 285

Received: 10/07/2009

Respondent: Patricia Robinson

Representation Summary:

Would not be looking at developing 10,000+ new houses.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 382

Received: 22/07/2009

Respondent: Peter Pounds

Representation Summary:

No.

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 458

Received: 27/07/2009

Respondent: Peter Clarke

Representation Summary:

Yes.

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 510

Received: 24/07/2009

Respondent: Georgina Wilson

Representation Summary:

Support.

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 581

Received: 27/07/2009

Respondent: Mr A M Webley

Representation Summary:

Support.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 644

Received: 23/07/2009

Respondent: Mr G.R. Summers

Representation Summary:

Object.

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 733

Received: 10/08/2009

Respondent: P.A. Yarwood

Representation Summary:

Yes.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 804

Received: 05/08/2009

Respondent: Faye Davis

Representation Summary:

I think further brownfield sites could be identified in order to protect greenbelt areas.

Comment

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 874

Received: 18/08/2009

Respondent: Adrian Farmer

Representation Summary:

If building is stopped we will all have a better environment

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 935

Received: 19/08/2009

Respondent: Christine Betts

Representation Summary:

No.

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 1017

Received: 24/08/2009

Respondent: Cllr Tim Sawdon

Representation Summary:

Support.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 1039

Received: 21/08/2009

Respondent: Kirit Marvania

Representation Summary:

Believe Kings Hill should be preserved.

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 1143

Received: 24/08/2009

Respondent: Mr and Mrs T Robinson

Representation Summary:

Support

Comment

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 1205

Received: 21/08/2009

Respondent: Barry Elliman

Representation Summary:

yes

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 1270

Received: 24/08/2009

Respondent: Andrew Horsley

Representation Summary:

See 17.11 especially and abide by it! Disagree strongly with 17.12 as it applies to Woodside Farm.

Comment

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 1329

Received: 24/08/2009

Respondent: Sarah Jane Horsley

Representation Summary:

Yes 17.11 - abide by it with regard to Whitnash.

17.12 - Disagree as it is to do with Woodside Farm.

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 1395

Received: 18/08/2009

Respondent: Guide Dogs for the Blind Association

Agent: DNS Planning and Design Consultants

Representation Summary:

Support

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 1495

Received: 27/08/2009

Respondent: Mr and Mrs Kundi

Number of people: 2

Representation Summary:

Object.

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 1580

Received: 31/08/2009

Respondent: B.L.A.S.T.

Representation Summary:

17a We find allotments across the district are home to diverse groups of flora and fauna along with providing a habitat for a great variety of birds, animals and reptiles including the protected Great Crested Newt and the national rarity Warwickshire Drooper Plum. May we once again remind WDC of the massive importance in maintaining green belt land between Leamington, Warwick and Kenilworth and we fully support the decision to remove it from the Options for Growth

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 1715

Received: 27/08/2009

Respondent: J.G Whetstone

Representation Summary:

Object.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 1752

Received: 01/09/2009

Respondent: Mr and Mrs D zacaroni

Representation Summary:

Object

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 1862

Received: 28/08/2009

Respondent: Val Hunnisett

Representation Summary:

Support.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 1898

Received: 31/07/2009

Respondent: Mrs Helen Cheatham

Representation Summary:

Not enough information.

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 1961

Received: 03/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Andrew Ferguson

Representation Summary:

support

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 1995

Received: 03/09/2009

Respondent: K A Ferguson

Representation Summary:

We see no sense in carpetting our green spaces with housing for a mobile population to travel elsewhere. Our remaining agricultural land should be preserved to feed future generations.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 2010

Received: 03/09/2009

Respondent: A. J Daubnley

Representation Summary:

We see no sense in carpetting our green spaces with housing for a mobile population to travel elsewhere. Our remaining agricultural land should be preserved to feed future generations.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 2021

Received: 03/09/2009

Respondent: The Occupier

Representation Summary:

We see no sense in carpetting our green spaces with housing for a mobile population to travel elsewhere. Our remaining agricultural land should be preserved

to feed future generations.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 2030

Received: 01/09/2009

Respondent: G Pritchard

Representation Summary:

Build on brown field sites: Coventry Airport, Peugeot and Flavel sites. Rejuvenate the bottom of town (old town), Althorpe Street, Regency Arcade etc.