(ii) Land at Station Approach, Leamington

Support

Representation ID: 3702

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Richard Brookes

Increase the density of housing - require the developer to put in more mitigating measures to develop the site fully.

Support

Representation ID: 3875

Received: 24/09/2009

Respondent: Debbie Wiggins

I like the British waterways suggestion of sustainability building and using the canal for heating. CABE has some great suggestions the council should follow. This could also become one of the new tourist attractions for Leamington!

Support

Representation ID: 3936

Received: 24/09/2009

Respondent: Andrea Telford

support

Support

Representation ID: 3952

Received: 24/09/2009

Respondent: Mr John Archer

An appriopriate site as part of a balanced provision of housing to meet identified needs

Comment

Representation ID: 4043

Received: 24/09/2009

Respondent: Ms Angela Clarke

Possibly, although noisy and not a very large area - may not be very pleasant to live there.

Support

Representation ID: 4046

Received: 24/09/2009

Respondent: Mrs Diana Sellwood

Support the use of land in this area as already in town area.

Support

Representation ID: 4178

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Onkar Mann

Brownfield Site

Object

Representation ID: 4256

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Kulwinder Fathers

Good re-use of brownfield land.

Support

Representation ID: 4533

Received: 22/09/2009

Respondent: Southern Windy Arbour Area Residents' Association

support

Support

Representation ID: 4595

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Mr S Morris

support

Support

Representation ID: 4809

Received: 18/10/2009

Respondent: Ian Frost

Support

Support

Representation ID: 4866

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Vera Leeke

Should provide more than 225 homes

Support

Representation ID: 4945

Received: 08/10/2009

Respondent: Mr Graham Harrison

Qualified YES - - It is impossible to give a reasoned response without knowing the infrastructure implications etc.

Support

Representation ID: 5046

Received: 18/09/2009

Respondent: Michael Morris

Support.

Support

Representation ID: 5129

Received: 22/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Barry Betts

Brown field / rejuvenation of existing areas.

Support

Representation ID: 5200

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Lindsay Wood

support

Support

Representation ID: 5205

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Sonia Owczarek

Support.

Comment

Representation ID: 5284

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: J. N. Price

Careful attention must be paid to the sympathetic development of this sensitive area at one of the
major visitor gateways to our area.

Support

Representation ID: 5340

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: SEAN DEELY

Housing density should be increased

Support

Representation ID: 5391

Received: 24/09/2009

Respondent: John Baxter

Support.

Support

Representation ID: 5523

Received: 22/09/2009

Respondent: Mr and Mrs G Morgan

Number of people: 2

Support.

Support

Representation ID: 5654

Received: 20/09/2009

Respondent: Jane Boynton

Support.

Support

Representation ID: 5763

Received: 24/09/2009

Respondent: Philip Wilson

Support.

Support

Representation ID: 5812

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Ms Alison Cox

Support.

Support

Representation ID: 5846

Received: 13/10/2009

Respondent: Pamela Payne

Support.

Object

Representation ID: 5891

Received: 05/10/2009

Respondent: Mr and Mrs C G Price

What is proposed for this land as not enough detail has been given.

Support

Representation ID: 5917

Received: 28/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Alan Roberts

Support.

Support

Representation ID: 5995

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Debbie Harris

Support.

Support

Representation ID: 6071

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Stephen Skidmore

Support.

Support

Representation ID: 6126

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Richard and Judy Swallow

Number of people: 2

OK