Do you support or object to the preferred option for securing affordable homes?

Object

Representation ID: 1463

Received: 25/08/2009

Respondent: David Burdon

If the District Council wishes to increase the numbers of affordable houses within the District I would propose that further Halls of Residents are constructed at the Warwick University Campus. This would 'free up' the many houses that are occupied by students in the south of Leamington Spa. This would also provide additional low cost accommodation in an area where there is some primary school capacity i.e. Shrubland Street, Kingsway and Clapham Terrace.

Object

Representation ID: 1484

Received: 27/08/2009

Respondent: Mr and Mrs Kundi

Number of people: 2

Object.

Object

Representation ID: 1520

Received: 28/08/2009

Respondent: Mr Nigel Hamilton

Affordable housing must be built to high standards i.e. Parker Morris or there is the risk of future slums being created with little appeal to the residents.

In terms of practical affordability, better public transport links to lower cost housing areas such as Coventry and North Warwickshire, to enable commuting would be a good simple, achievable interim solution.

This would need high frequency and reliability i.e. regular train running from Stratford to Rugby at 20 minute intervals via Warwick, Leamington, Kenilworth,Coventry, Nuneaton

Object

Representation ID: 1646

Received: 01/09/2009

Respondent: William Bethell

The bulk of houses built in Whitnash form the 70's onwards has been of 'starter type' of house and is a cause of evermoving community as families expand and fails to create an established and supportivee community as was the case with the older part of Whitnash.

Object

Representation ID: 1697

Received: 27/08/2009

Respondent: J.G Whetstone

Object.

Object

Representation ID: 1742

Received: 01/09/2009

Respondent: Mr and Mrs D zacaroni

Object

Object

Representation ID: 1770

Received: 20/08/2009

Respondent: Max Bacon

Object.

Object

Representation ID: 1841

Received: 28/08/2009

Respondent: Val Hunnisett

Believe you cannot truly skew the market. Aware you do have to do this for legislative reasons.

Support

Representation ID: 1880

Received: 31/07/2009

Respondent: Mrs Helen Cheatham

Operative word - affordable

Object

Representation ID: 1947

Received: 03/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Andrew Ferguson

object

Object

Representation ID: 2055

Received: 04/09/2009

Respondent: mr john jacques

because it is based on biased unproven numbers provided by New Labour to suit own ends in getting relected, to get votes from mass of welfare dependent unemployed/unemployable hangers-on it has created in 11 years of mismanagement.

and the views of local people and organisations has not been taken account of.

Support

Representation ID: 2328

Received: 21/07/2009

Respondent: S B Hoyles

Support.

Object

Representation ID: 2405

Received: 04/09/2009

Respondent: Roy Standley

No.

Object

Representation ID: 2443

Received: 08/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Connolly

Object.

Support

Representation ID: 2560

Received: 10/09/2009

Respondent: Mr R.A and Mrs B.E Donaldson

Number of people: 2

Yes, but in appropriate locations and not mixed with more expensive properties.

Support

Representation ID: 2630

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: John Arnold

Support.

Object

Representation ID: 2689

Received: 10/09/2009

Respondent: Mrs Margaret Devitt

Reduce to 30% and review. Flexibility is essential. 50 % is too high a proportion.

Support

Representation ID: 2753

Received: 09/09/2009

Respondent: Pauline Neale

40 % of all new build homes should be affordable housing.

Comment

Representation ID: 2797

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: Mrs Sheila F. Hadfield

Only brownfield sites.

Support

Representation ID: 2841

Received: 11/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Robert Butcher

Support.

Support

Representation ID: 2880

Received: 11/09/2009

Respondent: Susan Butcher

Support.

Object

Representation ID: 2909

Received: 15/09/2009

Respondent: ALISON ELFWOOD

THEY'RE IN THE WRONG LOCATIONS. AFFORDABLE HOUSING HAS TO GO HAND IN HAND WITH FACILITIES AND JOBS

Support

Representation ID: 2940

Received: 15/09/2009

Respondent: Barford, Sherbourne and Wasperton Joint Parish Council

Given the known and accepted need for significant amounts of Affordable Housing this council accepts the proposal to require 50% of site Affordable housing provision, provided:
* the thresholds for demanding that AH provision should be the same in both rural and urban areas
* AND provided that such requirement can be shown to be meeting measured need in that particular local area

Support

Representation ID: 2960

Received: 15/09/2009

Respondent: Mrs. penny Spooner

Local children are forced to move to Coventry affordable housing is really lacking in Kenilworth

Object

Representation ID: 2991

Received: 16/09/2009

Respondent: Mrs and Mr J Parr and Cotterill

This is a loaded question

Support

Representation ID: 3095

Received: 17/09/2000

Respondent: Mr Anthony Morris

Support

Support

Representation ID: 3164

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: Mr R.C Hadfield

Only on brown field sites.

Support

Representation ID: 3173

Received: 15/09/2009

Respondent: John Murphy

Given the known and accepted need for significant amounts of Affordable Housing WDC should require 50% of site Affordable housing provision, provided:
* the thresholds for demanding that AH provision should be the same in both rural and urban areas
* AND provided that such requirement can be shown to be meeting measured need in that particular local area

Object

Representation ID: 3279

Received: 20/09/2009

Respondent: Mr David John Bowers

Warwick is a popular place to live in I agree, and for this reason I wish it to stay that way.
The proposed strategy will only turn into another Tamworth.

Support

Representation ID: 3314

Received: 17/09/2009

Respondent: Caroline Martin

Support