Do you support or object to the preferred option for Rural Communities, particularly in respect of rural housing?

Comment

Representation ID: 4041

Received: 24/09/2009

Respondent: Mrs Diana Sellwood

There is a need to include some housing growth in the villages - of affordable housing.

Object

Representation ID: 4197

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Onkar Mann

Additional affordable housing should be considered for the rural areas

Object

Representation ID: 4249

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Kulwinder Fathers

More affordable rural housing will encourage changes in the demographics and help rural communities, schools & services to be sustained. Bishops Tachbrook, Heathcote & Whitnash have already had significant development.

Support

Representation ID: 4368

Received: 22/09/2009

Respondent: A Picken

Support

Support

Representation ID: 4529

Received: 22/09/2009

Respondent: Southern Windy Arbour Area Residents' Association

support

Support

Representation ID: 4592

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Mr S Morris

support

Support

Representation ID: 4666

Received: 23/10/2009

Respondent: V Gill Peppitt

support

Support

Representation ID: 4864

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Vera Leeke

The option should be more detailed eg. Minimum 80 new homes in each village settlement up to 2026. Small scale and in several locations. There is unused land in all villages and owners should be encouraged to offer it for development.

Support

Representation ID: 5043

Received: 18/09/2009

Respondent: Michael Morris

Support.

Object

Representation ID: 5182

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Lindsay Wood

Village ID needs to be maintained.

Object

Representation ID: 5201

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Sonia Owczarek

Object.

Object

Representation ID: 5337

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: SEAN DEELY

However the term "local needs" should be defined to mean for those already living within the parish or who have dependents living in the parish. The "local need" must also be determined by the Parish Council though a Parish Plan or Housing need survey.

Support

Representation ID: 5388

Received: 24/09/2009

Respondent: John Baxter

Support.

Object

Representation ID: 5437

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Mike Cheeseman

As stated it places all the emphasis on housing and I'm not sure this is the thing to be fixed first.

Support

Representation ID: 5520

Received: 22/09/2009

Respondent: Mr and Mrs G Morgan

Number of people: 2

Support.

Comment

Representation ID: 5576

Received: 20/09/2009

Respondent: George Martin

Provided it is zero carbon - or a low carbon neighborhood now.

Support

Representation ID: 5609

Received: 27/09/2009

Respondent: Dave Crisford

This option appears to mean that the building of market value housing within a village where this is supported by the local community will be accepted even where the village is designated Green Belt. This is an extension of the existing policy which restricts such development to Affordable Housing schemes. If this is correct, then I would be favour of this relaxation.

Support

Representation ID: 5651

Received: 20/09/2009

Respondent: Jane Boynton

Support.

Support

Representation ID: 5697

Received: 22/09/2009

Respondent: Roger Warren

Support.

Support

Representation ID: 5760

Received: 24/09/2009

Respondent: Philip Wilson

It is important to maintain existing allotment land and seek provision for future allotment land to keep it available for the community and not let it become an expensive housing estate

Support

Representation ID: 5809

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Ms Alison Cox

Support.

Support

Representation ID: 5844

Received: 13/10/2009

Respondent: Pamela Payne

We have to be careful that the smaller villages do not just disapper while the larger villages get larger and become towns and lose their identity.

Object

Representation ID: 5887

Received: 05/10/2009

Respondent: Mr and Mrs C G Price

Extra housing would lead to more traffic and more congestion.

Object

Representation ID: 5913

Received: 28/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Alan Roberts

Village should remain small, village envelopes should remain to control development. Parish Plans should be independently produced and not by small unelected groups.

Object

Representation ID: 5992

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Debbie Harris

Why not support these communities more by providing services within them and thus being able to develop more affordable housing in these areas.

Support

Representation ID: 6027

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Paul Skidmore

Support.

Object

Representation ID: 6134

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Richard and Judy Swallow

Number of people: 2

One cannot know whether the Council has identified all reasonable options or indeed whether any of those are identified are reasonable options.

Object

Representation ID: 6184

Received: 13/10/2009

Respondent: John, Elaine and Sarah Lewis

Object

Object

Representation ID: 6253

Received: 24/09/2009

Respondent: Ross Telford

Affordable housing is a priority but market prices housing is required plus bus services and post offices.

Object

Representation ID: 6336

Received: 18/09/2009

Respondent: John Jessamine

Object.