Do you support or object to the preferred option for Regeneration?

Showing comments and forms 1 to 30 of 106

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 120

Received: 06/07/2009

Respondent: R A Chapleo

Representation Summary:

Yes - but it must be implemented in a more professional and sustainable way than that which was recently employed in Old Town. See Birmingham's Urban Renewal programme.

Comment

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 167

Received: 07/07/2009

Respondent: mr John Wheatcroft

Representation Summary:

Tidy up the Packmores. It is not the most attractive place in Warwick - I think it is also called Lower Cape

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 325

Received: 21/07/2009

Respondent: Mr and Mrs D Bolam

Representation Summary:

Sensible.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 352

Received: 22/07/2009

Respondent: Peter Pounds

Representation Summary:

Object.

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 430

Received: 27/07/2009

Respondent: Peter Clarke

Representation Summary:

Support.

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 481

Received: 24/07/2009

Respondent: Georgina Wilson

Representation Summary:

In order to "lift" peole out of deprivation - the co-ordinaton of all the key agencies is imperative - and it's a very long term problem - the more hi-tech our employment opportunities become - the greater the percentage of those who are unable to access them.

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 531

Received: 02/08/2009

Respondent: Mrs J Stratton

Representation Summary:

support

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 551

Received: 27/07/2009

Respondent: Mr A M Webley

Representation Summary:

Support.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 614

Received: 23/07/2009

Respondent: Mr G.R. Summers

Representation Summary:

Object.

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 704

Received: 10/08/2009

Respondent: P.A. Yarwood

Representation Summary:

Support.

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 775

Received: 05/08/2009

Respondent: Faye Davis

Representation Summary:

Support.

Comment

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 843

Received: 18/08/2009

Respondent: Adrian Farmer

Representation Summary:

Do not really understand what is being planned

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 907

Received: 19/08/2009

Respondent: Christine Betts

Representation Summary:

Support.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 973

Received: 21/08/2009

Respondent: Kirit Marvania

Representation Summary:

Don't agree it is correct to loose the Green Belt at Kings Hill.

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 992

Received: 24/08/2009

Respondent: Cllr Tim Sawdon

Representation Summary:

Support.

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 1073

Received: 21/08/2009

Respondent: Mrs Pamela Beedham

Representation Summary:

Support.

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 1175

Received: 21/08/2009

Respondent: Barry Elliman

Representation Summary:

Support

Comment

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 1232

Received: 24/08/2009

Respondent: Andrew Horsley

Representation Summary:

Difficult to comment when there are no details.

Comment

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 1298

Received: 24/08/2009

Respondent: Sarah Jane Horsley

Representation Summary:

Not enough info

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 1300

Received: 24/08/2009

Respondent: Sarah Jane Horsley

Representation Summary:

People will travel unless all facilities are in each village.

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 1366

Received: 18/08/2009

Respondent: Guide Dogs for the Blind Association

Agent: DNS Planning and Design Consultants

Representation Summary:

Support

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 1481

Received: 27/08/2009

Respondent: Mr and Mrs Kundi

Number of people: 2

Representation Summary:

Object.

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 1560

Received: 31/08/2009

Respondent: B.L.A.S.T.

Representation Summary:

8b BLAST will be monitoring the progress of this strategy for sooner rather than later action

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 1628

Received: 01/09/2009

Respondent: William Bethell

Representation Summary:

No, No, No. Only in the event that you provide sensible means to overcome the resultant congestion, reduction in quality of life, pollution, noise,etc. This I consider an impossible task.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 1680

Received: 27/08/2009

Respondent: J.G Whetstone

Representation Summary:

Object.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 1728

Received: 01/09/2009

Respondent: Mr and Mrs D zacaroni

Representation Summary:

Object

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 1785

Received: 20/08/2009

Respondent: Max Bacon

Representation Summary:

Object.

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 1815

Received: 28/08/2009

Respondent: Val Hunnisett

Representation Summary:

Support.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 1836

Received: 31/07/2009

Respondent: Mrs Helen Cheatham

Representation Summary:

Not enough known about it. Not enough information in the public domain.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 1914

Received: 02/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Ed Rycroft

Representation Summary:

I'm all for the regeneration of deprived areas. It can turn communities around. lift people out of the poverty cycle. I cannot agree to the question asked that the council has identified all reasonable options as no options have actually been put forward apart from saying it will be on a case by case basis. That's not giving any information on which to make a judgement.