Do you agree with the Preferred Vision for Warwick District to 2026?

Object

Representation ID: 34154

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Mr and Mrs David and Sandra Hay

Objects to housing proposals on Land at Lower Heathcote Farm, Land West of Europa Way, Land at Woodside Farm, and Land South of Sydenham and East of Whitnash.
Queries position that 10,800 new homes are required for the period to 2026 and feel that the numbers that these assumptions have been based on have not been validated. The predictions for growth in the Core Strategy are based on the period of additional house building between 2001 and 2006 driven by inward growth from Coventry and Birmingham and not on local need - large number of proposed houses contradicts the vision

Object

Representation ID: 34162

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Ripanjit Mann

Objects to housing proposals on Land at Lower Heathcote Farm, Land West of Europa Way, Land at Woodside Farm, and Land South of Sydenham and East of Whitnash.
Queries position that 10,800 new homes are required for the period to 2026 and feel that the numbers that these assumptions have been based on have not been validated. The predictions for growth in the Core Strategy are based on the period of additional house building between 2001 and 2006 driven by inward growth from Coventry and Birmingham and not on local need - large number of proposed houses contradicts the vision

Object

Representation ID: 34170

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Mitra Mann

Objects to housing proposals on Land at Lower Heathcote Farm, Land West of Europa Way, Land at Woodside Farm, and Land South of Sydenham and East of Whitnash.
Queries position that 10,800 new homes are required for the period to 2026 and feel that the numbers that these assumptions have been based on have not been validated. The predictions for growth in the Core Strategy are based on the period of additional house building between 2001 and 2006 driven by inward growth from Coventry and Birmingham and not on local need - large number of proposed houses contradicts the vision

Object

Representation ID: 34178

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Mrs R Bhurji

Objects to housing proposals on Land at Lower Heathcote Farm, Land West of Europa Way, Land at Woodside Farm, and Land South of Sydenham and East of Whitnash.
Queries position that 10,800 new homes are required for the period to 2026 and feel that the numbers that these assumptions have been based on have not been validated. The predictions for growth in the Core Strategy are based on the period of additional house building between 2001 and 2006 driven by inward growth from Coventry and Birmingham and not on local need - large number of proposed houses contradicts the vision

Object

Representation ID: 34186

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Mr S Bhurji

Objects to housing proposals on Land at Lower Heathcote Farm, Land West of Europa Way, Land at Woodside Farm, and Land South of Sydenham and East of Whitnash.
Queries position that 10,800 new homes are required for the period to 2026 and feel that the numbers that these assumptions have been based on have not been validated. The predictions for growth in the Core Strategy are based on the period of additional house building between 2001 and 2006 driven by inward growth from Coventry and Birmingham and not on local need - large number of proposed houses contradicts the vision

Object

Representation ID: 34194

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Andrew Illsley

Objects to housing proposals on Land at Lower Heathcote Farm, Land West of Europa Way, Land at Woodside Farm, and Land South of Sydenham and East of Whitnash.
Queries position that 10,800 new homes are required for the period to 2026 and feel that the numbers that these assumptions have been based on have not been validated. The predictions for growth in the Core Strategy are based on the period of additional house building between 2001 and 2006 driven by inward growth from Coventry and Birmingham and not on local need - large number of proposed houses contradicts the vision

Object

Representation ID: 34202

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Melissa and Tom Horrocks

Objects to housing proposals on Land at Lower Heathcote Farm, Land West of Europa Way, Land at Woodside Farm, and Land South of Sydenham and East of Whitnash.
Queries position that 10,800 new homes are required for the period to 2026 and feel that the numbers that these assumptions have been based on have not been validated. The predictions for growth in the Core Strategy are based on the period of additional house building between 2001 and 2006 driven by inward growth from Coventry and Birmingham and not on local need - large number of proposed houses contradicts the vision

Object

Representation ID: 34208

Received: 28/09/2009

Respondent: Mr & Mrs P Pounds

We wish to see the whole plan withdrawn and an alternative presented that reflects the overwhelming opinion of the Warwick population( as reflected by the public meeting on 17th August 2009), and that will preserve the character of Warwick as an historical county town.
Object that the area of restraint (1E) is one of the first to be developed and should with immediate effect be designated as the last developed site and be protected until a more viable site is found and await for potential change in government and associated policies to occur.

Object

Representation ID: 34213

Received: 28/09/2009

Respondent: Mr & Mrs P Pounds

Objection to the lack of dispersal of planned growth - growth is focussed entirely in the area south of Leamington. This area has already been developed significantly in recent years - options would result in over development of this area

Object

Representation ID: 34216

Received: 28/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Roger White

We wish to see the whole plan withdrawn and an alternative presented that reflects the overwhelming opinion of the Warwick population( as reflected by the public meeting on 17th August 2009), and that will preserve the character of Warwick as an historical county town.
Object that the area of restraint (1E) is one of the first to be developed and should with immediate effect be designated as the last developed site and be protected until a more viable site is found and await for potential change in government and associated policies to occur.

Object

Representation ID: 34221

Received: 28/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Roger White

Objection to the lack of dispersal of planned growth - growth is focussed entirely in the area south of Leamington. This area has already been developed significantly in recent years - options would result in over development of this area

Object

Representation ID: 34224

Received: 28/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Rob Mitchell

We wish to see the whole plan withdrawn and an alternative presented that reflects the overwhelming opinion of the Warwick population( as reflected by the public meeting on 17th August 2009), and that will preserve the character of Warwick as an historical county town.
Object that the area of restraint (1E) is one of the first to be developed and should with immediate effect be designated as the last developed site and be protected until a more viable site is found and await for potential change in government and associated policies to occur.

Object

Representation ID: 34229

Received: 28/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Rob Mitchell

Objection to the lack of dispersal of planned growth - growth is focussed entirely in the area south of Leamington. This area has already been developed significantly in recent years - options would result in over development of this area

Object

Representation ID: 34232

Received: 28/09/2009

Respondent: L Clarke

We wish to see the whole plan withdrawn and an alternative presented that reflects the overwhelming opinion of the Warwick population( as reflected by the public meeting on 17th August 2009), and that will preserve the character of Warwick as an historical county town.
Object that the area of restraint (1E) is one of the first to be developed and should with immediate effect be designated as the last developed site and be protected until a more viable site is found and await for potential change in government and associated policies to occur.

Object

Representation ID: 34237

Received: 28/09/2009

Respondent: L Clarke

Objection to the lack of dispersal of planned growth - growth is focussed entirely in the area south of Leamington. This area has already been developed significantly in recent years - options would result in over development of this area

Object

Representation ID: 34240

Received: 28/09/2009

Respondent: Mr & Mrs S O'Connor

We wish to see the whole plan withdrawn and an alternative presented that reflects the overwhelming opinion of the Warwick population( as reflected by the public meeting on 17th August 2009), and that will preserve the character of Warwick as an historical county town.
Object that the area of restraint (1E) is one of the first to be developed and should with immediate effect be designated as the last developed site and be protected until a more viable site is found and await for potential change in government and associated policies to occur.

Object

Representation ID: 34245

Received: 28/09/2009

Respondent: Mr & Mrs S O'Connor

Objection to the lack of dispersal of planned growth - growth is focussed entirely in the area south of Leamington. This area has already been developed significantly in recent years - options would result in over development of this area

Object

Representation ID: 34248

Received: 28/09/2009

Respondent: Mrs Natalie Porter

We wish to see the whole plan withdrawn and an alternative presented that reflects the overwhelming opinion of the Warwick population( as reflected by the public meeting on 17th August 2009), and that will preserve the character of Warwick as an historical county town.
Object that the area of restraint (1E) is one of the first to be developed and should with immediate effect be designated as the last developed site and be protected until a more viable site is found and await for potential change in government and associated policies to occur.

Object

Representation ID: 34253

Received: 28/09/2009

Respondent: Mrs Natalie Porter

Objection to the lack of dispersal of planned growth - growth is focussed entirely in the area south of Leamington. This area has already been developed significantly in recent years - options would result in over development of this area

Object

Representation ID: 34256

Received: 28/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Richard Hewitt

We wish to see the whole plan withdrawn and an alternative presented that reflects the overwhelming opinion of the Warwick population( as reflected by the public meeting on 17th August 2009), and that will preserve the character of Warwick as an historical county town.
Object that the area of restraint (1E) is one of the first to be developed and should with immediate effect be designated as the last developed site and be protected until a more viable site is found and await for potential change in government and associated policies to occur.

Object

Representation ID: 34261

Received: 28/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Richard Hewitt

Objection to the lack of dispersal of planned growth - growth is focussed entirely in the area south of Leamington. This area has already been developed significantly in recent years - options would result in over development of this area

Object

Representation ID: 34264

Received: 28/09/2009

Respondent: Maria Garcia

We wish to see the whole plan withdrawn and an alternative presented that reflects the overwhelming opinion of the Warwick population( as reflected by the public meeting on 17th August 2009), and that will preserve the character of Warwick as an historical county town.
Object that the area of restraint (1E) is one of the first to be developed and should with immediate effect be designated as the last developed site and be protected until a more viable site is found and await for potential change in government and associated policies to occur.

Object

Representation ID: 34269

Received: 28/09/2009

Respondent: Maria Garcia

Objection to the lack of dispersal of planned growth - growth is focussed entirely in the area south of Leamington. This area has already been developed significantly in recent years - options would result in over development of this area

Object

Representation ID: 34272

Received: 28/09/2009

Respondent: Mr P Mason

We wish to see the whole plan withdrawn and an alternative presented that reflects the overwhelming opinion of the Warwick population( as reflected by the public meeting on 17th August 2009), and that will preserve the character of Warwick as an historical county town.
Object that the area of restraint (1E) is one of the first to be developed and should with immediate effect be designated as the last developed site and be protected until a more viable site is found and await for potential change in government and associated policies to occur.

Object

Representation ID: 34277

Received: 28/09/2009

Respondent: Mr P Mason

Objection to the lack of dispersal of planned growth - growth is focussed entirely in the area south of Leamington. This area has already been developed significantly in recent years - options would result in over development of this area

Object

Representation ID: 34280

Received: 28/09/2009

Respondent: Mrs Helen Cheatham

We wish to see the whole plan withdrawn and an alternative presented that reflects the overwhelming opinion of the Warwick population( as reflected by the public meeting on 17th August 2009), and that will preserve the character of Warwick as an historical county town.
Object that the area of restraint (1E) is one of the first to be developed and should with immediate effect be designated as the last developed site and be protected until a more viable site is found and await for potential change in government and associated policies to occur.

Object

Representation ID: 34285

Received: 28/09/2009

Respondent: Mrs Helen Cheatham

Objection to the lack of dispersal of planned growth - growth is focussed entirely in the area south of Leamington. This area has already been developed significantly in recent years - options would result in over development of this area

Object

Representation ID: 34288

Received: 28/09/2009

Respondent: Mrs J Walters

We wish to see the whole plan withdrawn and an alternative presented that reflects the overwhelming opinion of the Warwick population( as reflected by the public meeting on 17th August 2009), and that will preserve the character of Warwick as an historical county town.
Object that the area of restraint (1E) is one of the first to be developed and should with immediate effect be designated as the last developed site and be protected until a more viable site is found and await for potential change in government and associated policies to occur.

Object

Representation ID: 34293

Received: 28/09/2009

Respondent: Mrs J Walters

Objection to the lack of dispersal of planned growth - growth is focussed entirely in the area south of Leamington. This area has already been developed significantly in recent years - options would result in over development of this area

Object

Representation ID: 34296

Received: 28/09/2009

Respondent: Mr G F Eve

We wish to see the whole plan withdrawn and an alternative presented that reflects the overwhelming opinion of the Warwick population( as reflected by the public meeting on 17th August 2009), and that will preserve the character of Warwick as an historical county town.
Object that the area of restraint (1E) is one of the first to be developed and should with immediate effect be designated as the last developed site and be protected until a more viable site is found and await for potential change in government and associated policies to occur.