Do you agree with the Preferred Growth Strategy for Warwick District to 2026?

Object

Representation ID: 39316

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: Melissa and Tom Horrocks

Why was there no consideration of the creation of a new settlement (similar to Southam) - possibly near A46/J15 where there are direct links to road network. Why was there no consideration of the option to disperse growth across the District which was preferred by the public from the initial consulation?

Object

Representation ID: 39326

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: Mr S Payne

Why was there no consideration of the creation of a new settlement (similar to Southam) - possibly near A46/J15 where there are direct links to road network. Why was there no consideration of the option to disperse growth across the District which was preferred by the public from the initial consulation?

Object

Representation ID: 39336

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: Janet Morritt

Why was there no consideration of the creation of a new settlement (similar to Southam) - possibly near A46/J15 where there are direct links to road network. Why was there no consideration of the option to disperse growth across the District which was preferred by the public from the initial consulation?

Object

Representation ID: 39346

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: Mrs H S Johnson

Why was there no consideration of the creation of a new settlement (similar to Southam) - possibly near A46/J15 where there are direct links to road network. Why was there no consideration of the option to disperse growth across the District which was preferred by the public from the initial consulation?

Object

Representation ID: 39356

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: Dr Eirian Curzon

Why was there no consideration of the creation of a new settlement (similar to Southam) - possibly near A46/J15 where there are direct links to road network. Why was there no consideration of the option to disperse growth across the District which was preferred by the public from the initial consulation?

Object

Representation ID: 39366

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: Mr R Virdi

Why was there no consideration of the creation of a new settlement (similar to Southam) - possibly near A46/J15 where there are direct links to road network. Why was there no consideration of the option to disperse growth across the District which was preferred by the public from the initial consulation?

Object

Representation ID: 45214

Received: 25/08/2009

Respondent: Miss Madeleine Cox

Ridiculous number of properties to put in one rural area. Threatens existence of Bishop's Tachbrook, whose housing need survey showed need for 15 homes not 4200.
Congestion, pollution and speeding will only worsen.
Utilities and services already overstretched. Concern at length of time for emergency services to reach their destination.

Large estates bring own problems in terms of lack of social cohesion and anti-scoial behaviour.